GPU Comparison

Intel
GPU

Intel Arc A370M

CORE STATE DG2-128
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2050 MHz
TDP 35 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile

CORE STATE GA106
VRAM 6 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1425 MHz
TDP 80 W
BUS WIDTH 192 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
29,676
79,483
geekbench_vulkan
28,673
80,344
3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
N/A
1,821
passmark_directx_10
N/A
90
passmark_directx_11
N/A
110
passmark_directx_12
N/A
58
passmark_directx_9
N/A
146
passmark_g2d
N/A
588
passmark_g3d
N/A
13,230
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
5,718

Analysis: Intel Arc A370M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile

Reviewing the test numbers for RTX 3060 (NVIDIA) and Intel's Arc A370M, a distinct pattern appears. RTX 3060 (NVIDIA) consistently provides superior performance in every analysis. This rendering edge extends from significant to impressive relative to the given scenario. This dependability attests to underlying architectural superiority. Users wanting graphics throughput should take note.

This graphics memory benefit of RTX 3060 (NVIDIA) turns increasingly critical at demanding quality levels. Ultra HD scenarios needs considerable video memory, and RTX 3060 (NVIDIA) has greater buffer. The results into smoother frame rates in demanding workloads. Future titles should only need more graphics memory. This superiority expands over releases.

For ray tracing, RTX 3060 (NVIDIA) jumps further beyond of Intel's Arc A370M. The RT accelerators process demanding reflection computations considerably more efficiently. Players seeking cutting-edge fidelity should definitely consider RTX 3060 (NVIDIA). The ray tracing performance is considerable. Modern titles continually take advantage of real-time ray tracing effects.

In conclusion, RTX 3060 (NVIDIA) offers the more capable option in this analysis. The performance leads justify consideration for users constructing a powerful rendering system. Even though Intel's Arc A370M features its positives, the performance figures definitely benefits RTX 3060 (NVIDIA). Form your choice considering this. This performance gap is considerable sufficiently to influence.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
A370M
RTX 3060 Mobile
Core Specs
Shading Units
1,024
3,840 +275.0%
Shaders
1,024
3,840 +275.0%
TMUs
64
120 +87.5%
ROPs
32
48 +50.0%
SM Count
30
Execution Units
128
Clocks
Base Clock
1550 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
1425 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective
1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
4 GB
6 GB
VRAM (MB)
4,096
6,144 +50.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
64 bit
192 bit
Bandwidth
112.0 GB/s
336.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
4 MB
3 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
65.60 GPixel/s
68.40 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
131.2 GTexel/s
171.0 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
4.198 TFLOPS
10.94 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
1,049.6 GFLOPS (1:4)
171.0 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
8.397 TFLOPS (2:1)
10.94 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
8
30 +275.0%
Tensor Cores
120
XMX Cores
128
Power
TDP
35 W
80 W
TDP (W)
35
80 +128.6%
Power Connectors
None
Architecture
Architecture
Xe-HPG
Ampere
GPU Name
DG2-128
GA106
Generation
Alchemist (Arc 3 Mobile)
GeForce 30 Mobile
Process Size
6 nm
8 nm
Transistors
7,200 million
12,000 million
Die Size
157 mm²
276 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Samsung
Density
45.9M / mm²
43.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.6
Shader Model
6.6
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
Predecessor
GeForce 20 Mobile
View Arc A370M Details View GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile Details