GPU Comparison

Intel
GPU

Intel Arc A350M

CORE STATE DG2-128
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2200 MHz
TDP 25 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 4090 D

CORE STATE AD102
VRAM 24 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2520 MHz
TDP 425 W
BUS WIDTH 384 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
24,546
278,621
geekbench_vulkan
24,747
246,941
3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
N/A
8,587

Analysis: Intel Arc A350M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D

For this graphics card showdown, RTX 4090 by NVIDIA shows its leadership convincingly. If you're rendering at 1080p, RTX 4090 by NVIDIA dependably surpasses the Arc A350M card from Intel by significant percentages. This benchmark gap expands even wider at higher detail settings. This GPU handles resource-hungry scenarios with capability. Its engineering superiority are apparent.

When it comes to hardware ray tracing, RTX 4090 by NVIDIA moves further beyond of the Arc A350M card from Intel. Its dedicated hardware manage heavy reflection computations considerably more efficiently. Enthusiasts seeking premium graphics might certainly favor RTX 4090 by NVIDIA. The ray tracing superiority is substantial. Current titles more and more leverage ray tracing technology.

In-game tests throughout diverse resolutions consistently favor RTX 4090 by NVIDIA. Whether it's competitive scenarios to heavy productions, RTX 4090 by NVIDIA keeps its lead. The gaming dependability throughout diverse titles demonstrates fundamental engineering improvements. Enthusiasts should expect excellent performance no matter of title. The adaptability is outstanding.

When people considering a purchase choice, RTX 4090 by NVIDIA stands as the preferred selection. The reliable performance advantage over the Arc A350M card from Intel makes it the wiser investment for performance-oriented users. Evaluate your specific needs, though this benchmarks guides toward RTX 4090 by NVIDIA. Make an educated choice. This frame rate gap is real and substantial.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
A350M
RTX 4090 D
Core Specs
Shading Units
768
14,592 +1800.0%
Shaders
768
14,592 +1800.0%
TMUs
48
456 +850.0%
ROPs
24
176 +633.3%
SM Count
114
Execution Units
96
Clocks
Base Clock
1150 MHz
2280 MHz
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
2520 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective
1313 MHz 21 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
4 GB
24 GB
VRAM (MB)
4,096
24,576 +500.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6X
Memory Bus
64 bit
384 bit
Bandwidth
112.0 GB/s
1.01 TB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
4 MB
72 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
443.5 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
105.6 GTexel/s
1,149.1 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
3.379 TFLOPS
73.54 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
844.8 GFLOPS (1:4)
1,149.1 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
6.758 TFLOPS (2:1)
73.54 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
6
114 +1800.0%
Tensor Cores
456
XMX Cores
96
Power
TDP
25 W
425 W
TDP (W)
25
425 +1600.0%
Suggested PSU
800 W
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Architecture
Architecture
Xe-HPG
Ada Lovelace
GPU Name
DG2-128
AD102
Generation
Alchemist (Arc 3 Mobile)
GeForce 40
Process Size
6 nm
5 nm
Transistors
7,200 million
76,300 million
Die Size
157 mm²
609 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
45.9M / mm²
125.3M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.9
Shader Model
6.6
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Triple-slot
Length
304 mm 12 inches
Height
137 mm 5.4 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
1,599 USD
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
Predecessor
GeForce 30
Successor
GeForce 50
View Arc A350M Details View GeForce RTX 4090 D Details