GPU Comparison

Intel
GPU

Intel Arc A350M

CORE STATE DG2-128
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2200 MHz
TDP 25 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

A10G

CORE STATE GA102
VRAM 24 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1710 MHz
TDP 150 W
BUS WIDTH 384 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
24,546
158,063
geekbench_vulkan
24,747
145,863

Analysis: Intel Arc A350M vs NVIDIA A10G

Rendering performance evaluations between GeForce NVIDIA A10G and Radeon Arc A350M indicate a obvious victor. GeForce NVIDIA A10G provides considerably better benchmark scores throughout modern games. The graphics memory superiority and engineering advances result into visibly smoother gaming experiences. Test data demonstrates this assessment. Players seeking premium graphics would consider this.

Game performance results in multiple games consistently benefit GeForce NVIDIA A10G. From fast-paced games to demanding titles, GeForce NVIDIA A10G holds its lead. The performance reliability throughout various scenarios demonstrates underlying design superiority. Players will anticipate solid frame rates no matter of genre. This versatility is outstanding.

Game performance results across various games steadily advantage GeForce NVIDIA A10G. From esports titles to AAA titles, GeForce NVIDIA A10G maintains its lead. The frame rate reliability in different titles demonstrates core design benefits. Players can expect excellent results independent of scenario. The flexibility is outstanding.

When all is said and done: GeForce NVIDIA A10G secures this battle obviously. Those valuing rendering throughput would strongly select GeForce NVIDIA A10G over Radeon Arc A350M. This benchmark numbers demonstrates this verdict. The titles should execute considerably more fluidly. It's a obvious winner in this segment.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
A350M
A10G
Core Specs
Shading Units
768
9,216 +1100.0%
Shaders
768
9,216 +1100.0%
TMUs
48
288 +500.0%
ROPs
24
96 +300.0%
SM Count
72
Execution Units
96
Clocks
Base Clock
1150 MHz
1320 MHz
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
1710 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective
1563 MHz 12.5 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
4 GB
24 GB
VRAM (MB)
4,096
24,576 +500.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
64 bit
384 bit
Bandwidth
112.0 GB/s
600.2 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
4 MB
6 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
164.2 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
105.6 GTexel/s
492.5 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
3.379 TFLOPS
31.52 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
844.8 GFLOPS (1:4)
985.0 GFLOPS (1:32)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
6.758 TFLOPS (2:1)
31.52 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
6
72 +1100.0%
Tensor Cores
288
XMX Cores
96
Power
TDP
25 W
150 W
TDP (W)
25
150 +500.0%
Suggested PSU
450 W
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Architecture
Architecture
Xe-HPG
Ampere
GPU Name
DG2-128
GA102
Generation
Alchemist (Arc 3 Mobile)
Server Ampere (Axx)
Process Size
6 nm
8 nm
Transistors
7,200 million
28,300 million
Die Size
157 mm²
628 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Samsung
Density
45.9M / mm²
45.1M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.6
Shader Model
6.6
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Single-slot
Length
267 mm 10.5 inches
Height
112 mm 4.4 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
No outputs
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
Predecessor
Tesla Turing
Successor
Server Ada
View Arc A350M Details View A10G Details