Intel Arc A310E vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB Comparison

Intel Arc A310E and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB occupy opposite ends of the desktop GPU spectrum. The Arc A310E is a low-profile, low-power entry card aimed at basic rendering and multi-display setups, while the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is a mainstream performer with double the memory of its 8 GB sibling and a much larger compute footprint. Benchmark data confirms this split, but the differences extend far beyond raw scores.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc A310E wins in scenarios where physical size, power draw, and display connectivity take priority over compute throughput. Its single-slot design, 75 W TDP, and lack of any power connectors make it suitable for compact systems or office workstations. The 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs provide four independent display connections, which is useful for digital signage or multi-monitor productivity setups. Its 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs means it sits exactly in the middle of the database, a reasonable position for a low-end card handling 2D workloads or light video playback.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB wins in every compute-heavy category. Its 18th percentile ranking places it in the top fifth of all recorded GPUs, and its single recorded benchmark score of 2907 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 reflects a substantial performance buffer over the Arc. The 16 GB memory capacity and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth allow it to handle large textures, ray-traced scenes, and higher resolutions where the 4 GB Arc would run out of memory. The 4060 Ti also delivers 22.06 TFLOPS FP32 compute, a figure roughly seven times higher than the Arc's 3.072 TFLOPS.

Architecture Differences

The two cards use fundamentally different GPU architectures. Intel's Arc A310E is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-128 chip, fabricated on a 6 nm TSMC process. The die measures 157 mm² and contains 7,200 million transistors, yielding a density of 45.9 million transistors per square millimeter. This is a first-generation Alchemist product, part of the Arc 3 family, released on March 31, 2024, with an end-of-life status.

NVIDIA's RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB uses the Ada Lovelace architecture with the AD106 chip, built on a 5 nm TSMC process. The die is slightly larger at 188 mm² but packs 22,900 million transistors, resulting in a much higher density of 121.8 million transistors per square millimeter. This indicates a significantly more complex design with more functional units per area. The 4060 Ti launched earlier on May 17, 2023, and is also marked end-of-life, with the GeForce 50 series listed as its successor.

Core counts differ dramatically. The Arc A310E has 768 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, 16 raster operation units, and 6 ray tracing cores. The RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB has 4352 shading units, 136 TMUs, 48 ROPs, 34 RT cores, and 136 tensor cores. The tensor cores are absent from the Arc entirely, meaning the NVIDIA card supports hardware-accelerated AI workloads and DLSS-style features that the Arc cannot match.

Memory subsystems are also distinct. The Arc uses 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus with 124.0 GB/s bandwidth. The 4060 Ti uses 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. Both use PCIe 4.0 x8 interfaces, so the connection to the host system is identical in width.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database includes no direct head-to-head benchmark results between these two cards, and the Arc A310E has no recorded benchmark scores at all. The only measurable comparison comes from the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB's single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2907. This score places it within 0.1% of the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF (2910), 0.2% behind the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB (2913), 0.5% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 (2893), and 0.5% behind the NVIDIA Quadro P600 (2923). These deltas are all within noise margins, indicating the 4060 Ti 16 GB performs essentially identically to its nearest rivals in this specific test.

The Arc A310E's lack of benchmark data means its performance must be inferred from its specifications. Its FP32 throughput of 3.072 TFLOPS is roughly 14% of the 4060 Ti's 22.06 TFLOPS. Its texture rate of 64.00 GTexel/s is about 18.6% of the 4060 Ti's 344.8 GTexel/s. Its pixel rate of 32.00 GPixel/s is about 26.3% of the 4060 Ti's 121.7 GPixel/s. These ratios suggest the Arc would deliver roughly one-fourth to one-fifth the frame rate in GPU-bound workloads, though memory capacity limits would further constrain it in modern games.

Clock speeds also favor the NVIDIA card. The Arc runs at a fixed 2000 MHz for both base and boost. The 4060 Ti has a 2310 MHz base clock and a 2535 MHz boost clock. Memory clocks differ as well: 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective) for the Arc versus 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) for the NVIDIA card.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB than the Arc A310E in compute?

A: The 4060 Ti delivers 22.06 TFLOPS FP32 versus 3.072 TFLOPS for the Arc, a 7.2x advantage. Its texture rate is 344.8 GTexel/s versus 64.00 GTexel/s, a 5.4x difference. Pixel rate is 121.7 GPixel/s versus 32.00 GPixel/s, a 3.8x gap.

Q: What memory capacity does each card have?

A: The Arc A310E has 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus with 124.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB has 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Do both cards support the same graphics APIs?

A: Yes. Both list DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 in the database. Feature-level parity exists at the API level despite the large performance gap.

Q: Which card requires a power connector?

A: The Arc A310E has no power connectors and a 75 W TDP with a suggested 250 W PSU. The RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB requires a single 16-pin connector, has a 165 W TDP, and suggests a 450 W PSU.

Q: What display outputs does each card provide?

A: The Arc A310E provides 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0. The RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB provides 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Q: What is the physical size difference?

A: The Arc measures 168 mm in length, 69 mm in height, and 20 mm in width, and is single-slot. The 4060 Ti measures 240 mm in length, 111 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, and is dual-slot.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear separation of use cases. The Intel Arc A310E is for systems where power draw and physical footprint matter more than frame rates. Its 75 W TDP, single-slot profile, and no external power requirement make it a drop-in card for pre-built office machines or small-form-factor cases. Its four mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs provide multi-display capability without the need for adapters or splitters. The 50th percentile ranking indicates it is not a performance outlier in either direction, just a mid-pack basic GPU.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is for users who need actual graphics performance. Its 18th percentile ranking places it in the top 18% of all GPUs in the database, and its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2907 confirms it can handle modern rendering workloads. The 16 GB memory capacity is the standout feature, allowing large datasets, high-resolution textures, and ray-traced scenes that would exceed the Arc's 4 GB allocation. The 136 tensor cores enable AI acceleration and DLSS features that the Arc lacks entirely.

The choice between them is not about which is better, but which fits the intended workload. For digital signage, multi-monitor office setups, or low-power embedded use, the Arc A310E is the appropriate pick. For gaming, 3D rendering, or any compute-heavy task, the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is the only viable option of the two. The 4060 Ti's launch MSRP is 499 USD, though its end-of-life status means current pricing is not recorded in the database.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Arc A310E | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Xe-HPG | Ada Lovelace |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 5 nm |

| Transistors | 7,200 million | 22,900 million |

| Die Size | 157 mm² | 188 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 45.9M / mm² | 121.8M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 2000 MHz | 2310 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2000 MHz | 2535 MHz |

| Memory Clock | 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps) | 2250 MHz (18 Gbps) |

| Memory Size | 4 GB | 16 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | 64 bit | 128 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 124.0 GB/s | 288.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 768 | 4352 |

| TMUs | 32 | 136 |

| ROPs | 16 | 48 |

| RT Cores | 6 | 34 |

| Tensor Cores | None | 136 |

| Pixel Rate | 32.00 GPixel/s | 121.7 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 64.00 GTexel/s | 344.8 GTexel/s |

| FP32 Performance | 3.072 TFLOPS | 22.06 TFLOPS |

| FP16 Performance | 6.144 TFLOPS (2:1) | 22.06 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 75 W | 165 W |

| Slot Width | Single-slot | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 250 W | 450 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |

| Display Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |

| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |

| Length | 168 mm (6.6 inches) | 240 mm (9.4 inches) |

| Height | 69 mm (2.7 inches) | 111 mm (4.4 inches) |

| Width | 20 mm (0.8 inches) | 40 mm (1.6 inches) |

| Release Date | 2024-03-31 | 2023-05-17 |

| Production Status | End-of-life | End-of-life |

| Predecessor | Xe Graphics | GeForce 30 |

| Successor | Battlemage | GeForce 50 |