AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB vs Intel Arc A310E Comparison

The Verdict

The database comparison between the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB and the Intel Arc A310E reveals two products with fundamentally different positioning. The AMD part is a full-sized, dual-slot discrete graphics card built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture, while the Intel Arc A310E is a compact, single-slot, low-profile solution from the Xe-HPG architecture family. Benchmark data shows the AMD card delivers a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1995, placing it in the 13th percentile of all GPUs. The Intel card has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, with an average score of zero, making direct performance comparisons impossible. The AMD card is the clear choice for any user needing verified 3D rendering performance, while the Intel card is positioned for specialized embedded or space-constrained deployments where its 4 GB memory and 75 W power envelope are the primary considerations.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs share the same underlying foundry, TSMC, but use different process nodes. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB is built on a 7 nm process, while the Intel Arc A310E uses a more advanced 6 nm node. The AMD chip, codenamed Navi 22, packs 17,200 million transistors onto a 335 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 51.3 million transistors per square millimeter. The Intel DG2-128 chip contains 7,200 million transistors on a smaller 157 mm² die, with a density of 45.9 million transistors per square millimeter. The AMD design offers higher transistor density despite using an older process node.

Core configuration differs substantially. The AMD GPU features 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output pipelines. It also includes 36 ray tracing cores. The Intel Arc A310E is significantly smaller, with 768 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, plus 6 ray tracing cores. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API feature coverage is identical on paper.

Memory subsystems diverge sharply. The AMD card carries 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, delivering 320.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel card has 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, providing 124.0 GB/s. The memory clock differs as well: AMD runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed, while Intel runs at 1937 MHz with 15.5 Gbps effective. The AMD memory configuration offers roughly 2.6 times the bandwidth of the Intel part.

Physical dimensions and power requirements reflect their different use cases. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE is 267 mm long, 110 mm tall, and 40 mm wide, occupying a dual-slot form factor. It requires a single 8-pin power connector and carries a 170 W TDP with a suggested 450 W power supply. The Intel Arc A310E measures just 168 mm by 69 mm by 20 mm, fits in a single slot, draws no external power connectors, and has a 75 W TDP with a suggested 250 W PSU. The bus interface also differs: AMD uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while Intel uses PCIe 4.0 x8.

Display outputs show a generation gap. The AMD card provides one HDMI 2.1 port and three DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The Intel Arc A310E offers four mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs, supporting newer display connectivity standards. Production status also differs: the AMD card is listed as Active, while the Intel part is marked End-of-life. The AMD card was released on 2023-10-16, and the Intel card on 2024-03-31.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries between these two cards. The wins counters show zero for both products. The only recorded benchmark for either card is the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1995. The Intel Arc A310E has an empty benchmark array and an average benchmark score of zero, meaning the database has no performance data for it.

The AMD card's nearest rivals in the database provide useful performance context. The NVIDIA GRID K1 scores 1976, which is 1 percent below the AMD card. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 scores 1973, also 1.1 percent lower. On the other side, the Intel UHD Graphics 770 scores 2027, which is 1.6 percent higher than the AMD card. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M scores 2029, 1.7 percent higher. These are very tight margins, with the AMD card sitting within roughly 2 percent of its closest competitors in either direction.

The AMD card's 13th percentile ranking across all GPUs indicates that the majority of graphics cards in the database outperform it. However, the lack of any benchmark data for the Intel Arc A310E means no comparative performance statement can be made between the two cards in this review. The Intel card's 50th percentile ranking is based on its average score of zero, which does not reflect actual measured performance in the database.

FAQ

Q: Which card has more graphics memory?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB has 10 GB of GDDR6 memory, compared to the Intel Arc A310E's 4 GB of GDDR6. The AMD card also uses a much wider 160-bit bus versus the Intel card's 64-bit bus.

Q: Does the Intel Arc A310E require external power connectors?

A: No. The Intel card has no power connectors and a 75 W TDP with a suggested 250 W power supply. The AMD card requires a single 8-pin connector and has a 170 W TDP with a suggested 450 W PSU.

Q: Which card is smaller in physical size?

A: The Intel Arc A310E is considerably more compact, measuring 168 mm in length, 69 mm in height, and 20 mm in width, and it fits in a single slot. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE measures 267 mm by 110 mm by 40 mm and occupies a dual-slot design.

Q: What is the AMD card's performance percentile?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB ranks in the 13th percentile of all GPUs in the database, based on its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1995.

Q: Are both cards still in production?

A: No. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB is listed as Active, while the Intel Arc A310E is marked End-of-life.

Q: What display outputs does each card offer?

A: The AMD card provides one HDMI 2.1 port and three DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The Intel Arc A310E provides four mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB wins in every measurable performance category in the database. It has a recorded benchmark score of 1995, versus no score for the Intel card. Its raw compute capabilities are substantially higher: 11.29 TFLOPS FP32 versus 3.072 TFLOPS for the Intel part. Texture rate is 352.8 GTexel/s versus 64.00 GTexel/s. Pixel rate is 156.8 GPixel/s versus 32.00 GPixel/s. The AMD card also has significantly more memory bandwidth at 320.0 GB/s compared to 124.0 GB/s.

The Intel Arc A310E wins on physical efficiency and integration. Its 75 W TDP is less than half of the AMD card's 170 W. It requires no external power connectors, fits in a single slot, and measures just 168 mm long. Its suggested power supply of 250 W is far lower than the AMD card's 450 W recommendation. The Intel card also supports newer display technology with four mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs, compared to the AMD card's DisplayPort 1.4a and HDMI 2.1 combination. The Intel part is built on a smaller 6 nm process node versus AMD's 7 nm.

The AMD card wins on architecture scale. It uses the larger Navi 22 chip with 17,200 million transistors on a 335 mm² die. The Intel DG2-128 chip uses 7,200 million transistors on 157 mm². AMD has 2304 shading units, 144 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 36 ray tracing cores. Intel has 768 shading units, 32 TMUs, 16 ROPs, and 6 ray tracing cores. The AMD card also has a wider PCIe interface at x16 versus x8 for Intel.

The AMD card's production status as Active means it remains available, while the Intel Arc A310E is End-of-life. The AMD card also has a documented launch MSRP of 309 USD. The Intel card has no recorded launch MSRP in the database. The AMD card falls in the Radeon RX 6000 series, while the Intel card belongs to the Alchemist (Arc 3) generation. The AMD card's predecessor is Navi and its successor is Navi III. The Intel card's predecessor is Xe Graphics and its successor is Battlemage.

For users that need verified 3D performance, the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB is the only option with measured data. For deployments that prioritize small size, low power draw, and modern DisplayPort 2.0 outputs, the Intel Arc A310E offers distinct advantages despite lacking benchmark scores. The two cards serve entirely different segments, and the database provides no evidence that they compete directly in the same use cases.