GPU Comparison

Intel

GPU

Intel Arc A310

CORE STATE DG2-128

VRAM 4 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1750 MHz

TDP 30 W

BUS WIDTH 64 bit

ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG

PROCESS 6 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2022

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

RTX A2000 12 GB

CORE STATE GA106

VRAM 12 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1200 MHz

TDP 70 W

BUS WIDTH 192 bit

ARCHITECTURE Ampere

PROCESS 8 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl

30,607

66,876

geekbench_vulkan

28,964

N/A

passmark_directx_10

N/A

passmark_directx_11

N/A

passmark_directx_12

N/A

passmark_directx_9

N/A

passmark_g2d

625

N/A

passmark_g3d

5,433

N/A

passmark_gpu_compute

2,157

N/A

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12

N/A

1,309

Analysis: Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB

Graphics performance evaluations between Arc A310 and the NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB demonstrate a obvious leader. Arc A310 delivers considerably stronger performance over contemporary games. This video memory edge and design enhancements convert into visibly better visual experiences. Test data validates this observation. Users demanding high-end graphics might factor this in.

the NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB cannot be dismissed altogether, however the benchmark gap against Arc A310 is challenging to dismiss. For value-focused users, the NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB may nonetheless represent an option if its smaller cost makes up for the lower frame rates. However, for raw rendering power, Arc A310 stands as the undisputed victor. This verdict is obvious. Power hunters would gravitate toward Arc A310.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

A310

RTX A2000 12 GB

Core Specs

Shading Units

768

3,328 +333.3%

Shaders

768

3,328 +333.3%

TMUs

104 +225.0%

ROPs

48 +200.0%

SM Count

—

Execution Units

—

Clocks

Base Clock

1750 MHz

562 MHz

Boost Clock

1750 MHz

1200 MHz

Memory Clock

1937 MHz 15.5 Gbps effective

1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

4 GB

12 GB

VRAM (MB)

4,096

12,288 +200.0%

Memory Type

GDDR6

Memory Bus

64 bit

192 bit

Bandwidth

124.0 GB/s

288.0 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

—

128 KB (per SM)

L2 Cache

4 MB

3 MB

Performance

Pixel Rate

28.00 GPixel/s

57.60 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

56.00 GTexel/s

124.8 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

2.688 TFLOPS

7.987 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

672.0 GFLOPS (1:4)

124.8 GFLOPS (1:64)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

5.376 TFLOPS (2:1)

7.987 TFLOPS (1:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

26 +333.3%

Tensor Cores

—

104

XMX Cores

—

Power

TDP

30 W

70 W

TDP (W)

70 +133.3%

Suggested PSU

200 W

250 W

Power Connectors

None

Architecture

Xe-HPG

Ampere

GPU Name

DG2-128

GA106

Generation

Alchemist (Arc 3)

Workstation Ampere (Ax000)

Process Size

6 nm

8 nm

Transistors

7,200 million

12,000 million

Die Size

157 mm²

276 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Samsung

Density

45.9M / mm²

43.5M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

3.0

CUDA

—

8.6

Shader Model

6.6

6.8

Physical

Slot Width

Single-slot

Dual-slot

Length

—

167 mm 6.6 inches

Height

—

69 mm 2.7 inches

Outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x8

PCIe 4.0 x16

Other

Launch Price

—

449 USD

Production

End-of-life

Predecessor

Xe Graphics

Quadro Turing

Successor

Battlemage

Workstation Ada

View Arc A310 Details View RTX A2000 12 GB Details

GPU Comparison

Intel Arc A310

RTX A2000 12 GB

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

Analysis: Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

Related Graphics Cards

Related Comparisons