NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB
NVIDIA graphics card specifications and benchmark scores
Ray Tracing
Tensor CoresAt a Glance
NVIDIANVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB Specifications
RTX A2000 12 GB GPU Core
Shader units and compute resources
The NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB GPU core specifications define its raw processing power for graphics and compute workloads. Shading units (also called CUDA cores, stream processors, or execution units depending on manufacturer) handle the parallel calculations required for rendering. TMUs (Texture Mapping Units) process texture data, while ROPs (Render Output Units) handle final pixel output. Higher shader counts generally translate to better GPU benchmark performance, especially in demanding games and 3D applications.
RTX A2000 12 GB Clock Speeds
GPU and memory frequencies
Clock speeds directly impact the RTX A2000 12 GB's performance in GPU benchmarks and real-world gaming. The base clock represents the minimum guaranteed frequency, while the boost clock indicates peak performance under optimal thermal conditions. Memory clock speed affects texture loading and frame buffer operations. The RTX A2000 12 GB by NVIDIA dynamically adjusts frequencies based on workload, temperature, and power limits to maximize performance while maintaining stability.
NVIDIA's RTX A2000 12 GB Memory
VRAM capacity and bandwidth
VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory for storing textures, frame buffers, and shader data. The RTX A2000 12 GB's memory capacity determines how well it handles high-resolution textures and multiple displays. Memory bandwidth, measured in GB/s, affects how quickly data moves between the GPU and VRAM. Higher bandwidth improves performance in memory-intensive scenarios like 4K gaming. The memory bus width and type (GDDR6, GDDR6X, HBM) significantly influence overall GPU benchmark scores.
RTX A2000 12 GB by NVIDIA Cache
On-chip cache hierarchy
On-chip cache provides ultra-fast data access for the RTX A2000 12 GB, reducing the need to fetch data from slower VRAM. L1 and L2 caches store frequently accessed data close to the compute units. AMD's Infinity Cache (L3) dramatically increases effective bandwidth, improving GPU benchmark performance without requiring wider memory buses. Larger cache sizes help maintain high frame rates in memory-bound scenarios and reduce power consumption by minimizing VRAM accesses.
RTX A2000 12 GB Theoretical Performance
Compute and fill rates
Theoretical performance metrics provide a baseline for comparing the NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB against other graphics cards. FP32 (single-precision) performance, measured in TFLOPS, indicates compute capability for gaming and general GPU workloads. FP64 (double-precision) matters for scientific computing. Pixel and texture fill rates determine how quickly the GPU can render complex scenes. While real-world GPU benchmark results depend on many factors, these specifications help predict relative performance levels.
RTX A2000 12 GB Ray Tracing & AI
Hardware acceleration features
The NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB includes dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI acceleration. RT cores handle real-time ray tracing calculations for realistic lighting, reflections, and shadows in supported games. Tensor cores (NVIDIA) or XMX cores (Intel) accelerate AI workloads including DLSS, FSR, and XeSS upscaling technologies. These features enable higher visual quality without proportional performance costs, making the RTX A2000 12 GB capable of delivering both stunning graphics and smooth frame rates in modern titles.
Ampere Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB is built on NVIDIA's Ampere architecture, which defines how the GPU processes graphics and compute workloads. The manufacturing process node affects power efficiency, thermal characteristics, and maximum clock speeds. Smaller process nodes pack more transistors into the same die area, enabling higher performance per watt. Understanding the architecture helps predict how the RTX A2000 12 GB will perform in GPU benchmarks compared to previous generations.
NVIDIA's RTX A2000 12 GB Power & Thermal
TDP and power requirements
Power specifications for the NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB determine PSU requirements and thermal management needs. TDP (Thermal Design Power) indicates the heat output under typical loads, guiding cooler selection. Power connector requirements ensure adequate power delivery for stable operation during demanding GPU benchmarks. The suggested PSU wattage accounts for the entire system, not just the graphics card. Efficient power delivery enables the RTX A2000 12 GB to maintain boost clocks without throttling.
RTX A2000 12 GB by NVIDIA Physical & Connectivity
Dimensions and outputs
Physical dimensions of the NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB are critical for case compatibility. Card length, height, and slot width determine whether it fits in your chassis. The PCIe interface version affects bandwidth for communication with the CPU. Display outputs define monitor connectivity options, with modern cards supporting multiple high-resolution displays simultaneously. Verify these specifications against your case and motherboard before purchasing to ensure a proper fit.
NVIDIA API Support
Graphics and compute APIs
API support determines which games and applications can fully utilize the NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB. DirectX 12 Ultimate enables advanced features like ray tracing and variable rate shading. Vulkan provides cross-platform graphics capabilities with low-level hardware access. OpenGL remains important for professional applications and older games. CUDA (NVIDIA) and OpenCL enable GPU compute for video editing, 3D rendering, and scientific applications. Higher API versions unlock newer graphical features in GPU benchmarks and games.
RTX A2000 12 GB Product Information
Release and pricing details
The NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB is manufactured by NVIDIA as part of their graphics card lineup. Release date and launch pricing provide context for comparing GPU benchmark results with competing products from the same era. Understanding the product lifecycle helps evaluate whether the RTX A2000 12 GB by NVIDIA represents good value at current market prices. Predecessor and successor information aids in tracking generational improvements and planning future upgrades.
RTX A2000 12 GB Benchmark Scores
3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12Source
3DMark Steel Nomad is the latest GPU benchmark running at native 4K with DirectX 12. It's roughly 3x more demanding than Time Spy, testing NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB with cutting-edge rendering techniques. The benchmark uses state-of-the-art graphics technologies to stress modern hardware.
Top 5 Performers
Top 5 PerformersNearby Performers
Nearby Performersgeekbench_openclSource
Geekbench OpenCL tests GPU compute performance using the cross-platform OpenCL API. This shows how NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB handles parallel computing tasks like video encoding and scientific simulations. OpenCL is widely supported across different GPU vendors and platforms.
Top 5 Performers
Nearby Performers
About NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB
NVIDIA’s RTX A2000 12 GB is a workstation-class GPU built on the Ampere architecture with a GA106 chip, fabricated on Samsung’s 8 nm process with 12,000 million transistors on a 276 mm² die. It is an end-of-life product, released on November 22, 2021, with a launch MSRP of 449 USD, and serves as the bridge between the Quadro Turing generation and the Workstation Ada lineup. The card’s benchmark data is limited to a single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 run, scoring 1309, which places it in the 6th percentile of all GPUs — a figure that requires careful interpretation given its professional orientation and modest absolute performance.
Who Should Consider It
The RTX A2000 12 GB is not a card for high-refresh-rate gaming or for pushing 4K resolutions at maximum detail. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1309 places it in the 6th percentile of all GPUs, meaning the overwhelming majority of graphics cards—including many consumer-focused models—will outperform it in raw rasterization. Benchmark results indicate this is a low-power, compact workstation solution where the priority is driver stability and professional feature support rather than raw frame throughput. Users targeting 1080p gaming at medium to high settings for older titles may find it adequate, but the data does not support expectations for modern AAA games at high presets, even at 1080p. At 1440p, the card would likely struggle to maintain playable frame rates in demanding scenarios, and 4K gaming is effectively out of reach with this level of performance.
Instead, the intended audience is professionals who need a dual-slot, 167 mm (6.6 inches) card with four mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, which supports multi-monitor workstation setups. The 12 GB GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth provides a meaningful capacity advantage over many older workstation cards, making it suitable for GPU-accelerated compute tasks, CAD, and content creation workloads where memory capacity is more valuable than raw pixel throughput. Its 70 W TDP means it can be installed in systems with modest power delivery, and the lack of power connectors simplifies installation in small-form-factor or prebuilt systems. For users migrating from older Quadro Turing cards, the A2000 offers a modern feature set including DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 support, along with 26 ray-tracing cores and 104 tensor cores for accelerated AI inference. However, given its end-of-life status and low percentile ranking, this is a card for specific professional niches, not for general-purpose users seeking a high-performance GPU.
FAQ
Q: How does the RTX A2000 12 GB perform in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12?
A: The card scores 1309 points in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 benchmark, which places it in the 6th percentile of all GPUs, indicating entry-level performance relative to the broader graphics card market.
Q: What are the memory specifications of this card?
A: It features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with a memory clock of 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) and a total bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s.
Q: Does the RTX A2000 require external power connectors?
A: No. The card has no power connectors and relies entirely on the PCIe slot for power, with a TDP of 70 W and a suggested power supply rating of 250 W.
Q: What display outputs are available?
A: The card provides four mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, making it suitable for multi-monitor professional setups.
Q: What is the physical size of the card?
A: It measures 167 mm (6.6 inches) in length and 69 mm (2.7 inches) in height, with a dual-slot width, which is compact for a workstation GPU.
Q: What is the production status of the RTX A2000 12 GB?
A: It is marked as end-of-life, having been released on November 22, 2021, with a launch MSRP of 449 USD.
How It Compares
The nearest rival in the benchmark database is the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M, which scores 1313 on average. The RTX A2000 trails this mobile part by 0.3%, a negligible delta that effectively places them at parity in this specific test. This comparison is striking because the GT 520M is an ancient mobile GPU, underscoring how the A2000’s absolute performance is modest in modern terms, despite its workstation pedigree.
The NVIDIA GeForce 930MX scores 1302 on average, and the RTX A2000 leads it by 0.5%. Again, the difference is within noise, but the A2000 does edge out this older mobile chip. The 930MX is a low-end part from a previous generation, so this narrow win highlights that the A2000’s raw 3D performance is comparable to legacy entry-level hardware rather than contemporary desktop cards.
Against the AMD Radeon R9 380, which averages 1293, the RTX A2000 is 1.3% faster. The R9 380 was a mid-range desktop card from its era, and the A2000’s marginal victory suggests that its compute-oriented architecture does not translate into significant rasterization advantages. The small delta indicates that for gaming workloads, users would see virtually identical frame rates between these two very different products.
The closest workstation rival is the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile, which scores 1285 on average. The RTX A2000 is 1.9% ahead of this mobile workstation part. This is the most relevant comparison for professional users, as both target similar workloads, but the A2000’s lead is slim, indicating that mobile workstation GPUs of the previous generation offer comparable performance in this benchmark.
Power and Cooling
The RTX A2000 12 GB is a remarkably power-efficient card with a TDP of just 70 W. This low power draw means it requires no auxiliary power connectors, drawing all its power from the PCIe 4.0 x16 slot. The suggested power supply rating is 250 W, which is exceptionally low by modern standards and allows the card to be installed in office workstations or small-form-factor systems without PSU upgrades. The thermal solution is a dual-slot cooler, which, combined with the modest power envelope, should keep temperatures manageable under sustained load. The card’s compact dimensions—167 mm in length and 69 mm in height—further enhance its compatibility with constrained chassis. Given its end-of-life production status, users should ensure that their systems meet the PCIe 4.0 interface requirement, although the card would also operate in a PCIe 3.0 slot with reduced bandwidth. The lack of power connectors simplifies cable management, and the 250 W PSU recommendation means even older power supplies with adequate PCIe slot power can support this GPU.
Benchmark Performance
The sole benchmark score for the RTX A2000 12 GB is 1309 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, with an average benchmark score of 1309. The percentile rank of 6% against all GPUs is a stark indicator of its position in the market—this is a card that sits in the bottom tier of overall graphics performance. When compared to its nearest rivals, the deltas are all within 2%, which suggests that the A2000’s performance is tightly clustered with a set of very different GPUs, from legacy mobile chips to older desktop parts.
Specifically, the A2000 is 0.3% slower than the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M (score 1313), a result that effectively shows no meaningful difference. It is 0.5% faster than the GeForce 930MX (score 1302), again a negligible gap. Against the AMD Radeon R9 380 (score 1293), the A2000 holds a 1.3% advantage, while it is 1.9% ahead of the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile (score 1285). These deltas indicate that the A2000 does not deliver a significant performance uplift over any of these rivals in this particular benchmark; instead, it sits at the top of a narrow band spanning just 28 points between the lowest and highest scores.
The FP32 compute throughput is 7.987 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 7.987 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), which is a respectable figure for a 70 W card, but this does not translate into competitive 3DMark performance. The pixel rate is 57.60 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 124.8 GTexel/s, figures that are consistent with a card designed for professional workloads rather than gaming. The base clock is 562 MHz with a boost clock of 1200 MHz, which are low by consumer GPU standards but contribute to the power efficiency. The presence of 26 ray-tracing cores and 104 tensor cores suggests that the A2000 is optimized for ray-traced rendering and AI-accelerated tasks, where its raw 3D rasterization score may underrepresent its capabilities. However, based solely on the available benchmark data, the RTX A2000 12 GB is not a high-performance graphics card, and its value proposition lies entirely in its professional feature set, low power consumption, and compact form factor rather than in raw speed.
The AMD Equivalent of RTX A2000 12 GB
Looking for a similar graphics card from AMD? The AMD Radeon RX 6600 offers comparable performance and features in the AMD lineup.
Popular NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB Comparisons
See how the RTX A2000 12 GB stacks up against similar graphics cards from the same generation and competing brands.
Compare RTX A2000 12 GB with Other GPUs
Select another GPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse GPUs