Intel Arc 140T Mobile vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no measured benchmark scores for either the Intel Arc 140T Mobile or the Lisuan Tech LX PRO. Both entries show an average benchmark score of 0, and the head-to-head benchmark list is empty. The percentile ranking for each GPU against all recorded GPUs is identical at 50, placing both in the middle of the distribution based on the current dataset.

Without recorded frame rates or synthetic scores, the comparison must rely on the architectural and specification data provided in the database. The raw compute figures reveal a significant gap in raw throughput. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the Intel Arc 140T Mobile provides 4.813 TFLOPS. That places the LX PRO roughly 5.1 times ahead in single-precision floating-point work, a direct consequence of its 6144 shading units versus the Arc 140T's 1024.

Texture and pixel throughput follow the same pattern. The LX PRO reaches 384.0 GTexel/s and 192.0 GPixel/s, compared to 150.4 GTexel/s and 75.20 GPixel/s for the Arc 140T. The LX PRO is approximately 2.6 times faster in texture fill and 2.6 times faster in pixel fill. These figures indicate that for any workload dominated by rasterization or pixel shading, the LX PRO holds a commanding lead.

Memory bandwidth favors the discrete card overwhelmingly. The LX PRO uses 24 GB of GDDR6 memory across a 192-bit bus, yielding 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Arc 140T uses system shared memory with bandwidth described as system dependent, meaning its effective throughput varies with the host platform's memory configuration. In a desktop with dual-channel DDR5, the shared memory bandwidth typically falls well short of 432.0 GB/s, though the database does not specify a number for the integrated GPU's memory performance.

The FP16 figures mirror the FP32 ratio. The LX PRO achieves 49.15 TFLOPS in FP16, while the Arc 140T reaches 9.626 TFLOPS. Both use a 2:1 ratio relative to their FP32 rates, indicating no specialized tensor core acceleration in either product. For AI inference or machine learning workloads relying on FP16, the LX PRO provides roughly 5.1 times the throughput.

The Intel part does hold one architectural advantage: it includes 8 dedicated ray tracing cores. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO lists no ray tracing cores, meaning its ray tracing capability, if any, is not recorded in the database. The Arc 140T also supports Vulkan 1.4, whereas the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6.

The power envelope differs drastically, but the database does not provide efficiency metrics, so any power-to-performance analysis must be qualitative. The Arc 140T is rated at 35 W TDP and is an integrated graphics processor, while the LX PRO is a dual-slot discrete card at 225 W TDP with a 1x 16-pin power connector and a 550 W suggested PSU.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 6144 shading units. The Intel Arc 140T Mobile has 1024 shading units.

Q: What is the memory configuration of each GPU?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth and memory clocked at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The Intel Arc 140T Mobile uses system shared memory with a system dependent bandwidth and no dedicated memory clock.

Q: Does either GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: The Intel Arc 140T Mobile includes 8 ray tracing cores. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO lists no ray tracing cores in the database.

Q: What are the API support levels for each GPU?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Intel Arc 140T Mobile supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3.

Q: What is the physical form factor of each GPU?

A: The Intel Arc 140T Mobile is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with no slot width, fitting directly into the host device. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO is a dual-slot discrete card measuring 248 mm by 118 mm by 48 mm, using a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

Q: Which GPU has a higher pixel fill rate?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has a pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s, compared to 75.20 GPixel/s for the Intel Arc 140T Mobile.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc 140T Mobile uses the Xe-LPG+ architecture built on a 5 nm TSMC process. It belongs to the Arc Graphics-M (Arrow Lake) generation and is part of the Arrow Lake-H chip. The architecture includes 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, 32 ROPs, and 8 ray tracing cores. The Xe-LPG+ design is Intel's integrated graphics solution, relying entirely on system memory for frame buffer storage. Its base clock is 300 MHz with a boost clock of 2350 MHz. The production status is active, and it was released on January 12, 2025, succeeding the HD Graphics-M.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses the TrueGPU architecture built on a 6 nm TSMC process, belonging to the 7G100 generation with the 7G105 chip. This architecture is markedly different: it has 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 ROPs, but no ray tracing cores are listed. The LX PRO is a discrete card with dedicated GDDR6 memory, a 192-bit memory bus, and a 2250 MHz memory clock (18 Gbps effective). It was released on March 16, 2026, and is also listed as active in production.

The node difference is small: 5 nm for Intel versus 6 nm for Lisuan Tech. Both use TSMC as the foundry. Transistor counts and die sizes are listed as unknown for both, so no density comparison is possible from the data. The Intel part integrates into a mobile platform, while the LX PRO is an add-in board for desktop systems. This fundamental design split drives all other differences: one is constrained by power and thermal limits of a laptop chassis, the other is built for a desktop with a dedicated power supply.

The Intel architecture includes ray tracing hardware, which the Lisuan architecture does not record. The Vulkan version also differs: Intel supports 1.4, Lisuan supports 1.3. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate and OpenGL 4.6, so feature parity exists at the highest DirectX level. The Lisuan card has no listed predecessor, while the Intel part succeeds the HD Graphics-M.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Arc 140T Mobile | Lisuan Tech LX PRO |

|----------------|----------------------|--------------------|

| Architecture | Xe-LPG+ | TrueGPU |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |

| Shading Units | 1024 | 6144 |

| Texture Mapping Units | 64 | 192 |

| Raster Operation Units | 32 | 96 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 8 | None listed |

| Base Clock | 300 MHz | Not listed |

| Boost Clock | 2350 MHz | Not listed |

| Memory Size | System Shared | 24 GB GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | System Shared | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 432.0 GB/s |

| Memory Clock | System Shared | 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) |

| FP32 Performance | 4.813 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 Performance | 9.626 TFLOPS (2:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| Pixel Rate | 75.20 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 150.4 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| TDP | 35 W | 225 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None listed | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | None listed | 550 W |

| Bus Interface | IGP | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan Version | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Dimensions | Not listed | 248 mm x 118 mm x 48 mm |

| Release Date | January 12, 2025 | March 16, 2026 |

The table shows the LX PRO leads in every compute and memory specification, while the Arc 140T leads in having ray tracing cores and a newer Vulkan version. The Intel part has no listed power connectors, no dimensions, and no suggested PSU because it is an integrated processor. The Lisuan card requires a 550 W PSU and a 16-pin power connector, typical for a 225 W discrete GPU.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear split between two very different product categories. The Intel Arc 140T Mobile is an integrated GPU for laptops, designed for power efficiency and portability at 35 W TDP. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO is a high-end desktop discrete card at 225 W TDP, built for maximum throughput with 24 GB of GDDR6 memory and 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 compute.

For raw performance, the LX PRO wins decisively across every measurable compute metric. It offers 5.1 times the FP32 throughput, 5.1 times the FP16 throughput, 2.6 times the texture fill rate, and 2.6 times the pixel fill rate compared to the Arc 140T. Its 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth dwarfs the system-dependent shared memory of the Intel part. Anyone needing sustained rendering, simulation, or AI inference workloads should choose the LX PRO.

The Arc 140T wins on features that matter in integrated contexts. It has ray tracing cores, which the LX PRO lacks entirely. It supports Vulkan 1.4, a newer version than the LX PRO's 1.3. Its 35 W power draw means it can run in thin-and-light laptops without external power connectors, which the 225 W dual-slot LX PRO cannot match. The Arc 140T also launches earlier in the database record, from January 2025 versus March 2026.

Neither product has recorded benchmark scores, so real-world performance differences cannot be quantified beyond the specification-derived rates. The percentile rankings are identical at 50, and the average benchmark scores are both zero. A builder choosing between these two is really choosing between a mobile integrated solution and a desktop discrete solution, not between two comparable products.

Where Each One Wins

Intel Arc 140T Mobile wins on integration and portability. Its IGP form factor means no slot width, no power connectors, and no PSU requirements. It fits into any device with an Arrow Lake-H processor. The 35 W TDP allows deployment in battery-powered systems. Its 8 ray tracing cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing that the LX PRO cannot offer. Vulkan 1.4 support is a forward-looking feature for Linux gaming and compute. The 300 MHz base clock and 2350 MHz boost clock are recorded, though the LX PRO has no clock figures in the database.

Lisuan Tech LX PRO wins on raw compute and memory. Its 6144 shading units, 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 place it in a performance class far above the Arc 140T. The 24 GB GDDR6 frame buffer with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth supports large textures, high-resolution rendering, and data-heavy compute workloads. The 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate and 384.0 GTexel/s texture rate handle high-resolution gaming and professional 3D rendering. The dual-slot cooler and 248 mm length indicate a card designed for sustained desktop operation. Its 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor setups, while the Arc 140T's outputs are dependent on the portable device.

Use-case split: For a laptop user needing integrated graphics with ray tracing support and low power draw, the Arc 140T is the only choice. For a desktop builder assembling a high-performance workstation or gaming rig with a 550 W PSU and space for a dual-slot card, the LX PRO provides over five times the compute throughput and dedicated memory. The absence of ray tracing cores in the LX PRO means games or applications relying on DXR or Vulkan ray tracing will not benefit from hardware acceleration, while the Arc 140T supports that feature despite its lower overall performance.