GPU Comparison

Intel

GPU

Intel Arc 140T Mobile

CORE STATE Arrow Lake-H

VRAM System Shared

CLOCK SPEED 2350 MHz

TDP 35 W

BUS WIDTH System Shared

ARCHITECTURE Xe-LPG+

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2025

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 5090

CORE STATE GB202

VRAM 32 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2407 MHz

TDP 575 W

BUS WIDTH 512 bit

ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12

N/A

18,355

geekbench_opencl

N/A

334,370

geekbench_vulkan

N/A

376,728

passmark_directx_10

N/A

226

passmark_directx_11

N/A

341

passmark_directx_12

N/A

185

passmark_directx_9

N/A

395

passmark_g2d

N/A

1,413

passmark_g3d

N/A

39,650

passmark_gpu_compute

N/A

26,756

Analysis: Intel Arc 140T Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

When gaming capability is extremely evenly balanced, this analysis between NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 and Radeon Intel Arc 140T Mobile grows particularly nuanced. Each cards exchange leads throughout diverse benchmarks. This aggregate picture is one of remarkable equivalence. Not one comes out as a clear winner. The determination depends on particular priorities.

Playing games benchmarks also indicate similar scores between NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 and Radeon Intel Arc 140T Mobile. Smoothness deltas often remain inside single digits. The marginal deltas are hardly perceptible during practical gameplay. Both cards achieve fluid gaming. Those who game can decide comfortably between them.

At the end of the day, consumers should choose based on availability rather than absolute FPS only. Either NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 and Radeon Intel Arc 140T Mobile provide solid graphics results for their target tiers. The choice hinges on personal priorities. Either selection is solid. Users can't go astray with either.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

140T Mobile

RTX 5090

Core Specs

Shading Units

1,024

21,760 +2025.0%

Shaders

1,024

21,760 +2025.0%

TMUs

680 +962.5%

ROPs

176 +450.0%

SM Count

—

170

Execution Units

128

—

Clocks

Base Clock

300 MHz

2017 MHz

Boost Clock

2350 MHz

2407 MHz

Memory Clock

System Shared

1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

System Shared

32 GB

VRAM (MB)

—

32,768

Memory Type

System Shared

GDDR7

Memory Bus

System Shared

512 bit

Bandwidth

System Dependent

1.79 TB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

—

128 KB (per SM)

L2 Cache

4 MB

96 MB

Performance

Pixel Rate

75.20 GPixel/s

423.6 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

150.4 GTexel/s

1,636.8 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

4.813 TFLOPS

104.8 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

1,203.2 GFLOPS (1:4)

1.637 TFLOPS (1:64)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

9.626 TFLOPS (2:1)

104.8 TFLOPS (1:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

170 +2025.0%

Tensor Cores

—

680

XMX Cores

128

—

Power

TDP

35 W

575 W

TDP (W)

575 +1542.9%

Suggested PSU

—

950 W

Power Connectors

—

1x 16-pin

Architecture

Xe-LPG+

Blackwell 2.0

GPU Name

Arrow Lake-H

GB202

Generation

Arc Graphics-M (Arrow Lake)

GeForce 50

Process Size

5 nm

Transistors

unknown

92,200 million

Die Size

unknown

750 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Density

—

122.9M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

3.0

CUDA

—

12.0

Shader Model

6.8

6.9

Physical

Slot Width

IGP

Dual-slot

Length

—

304 mm 12 inches

Height

—

137 mm 5.4 inches

Outputs

Portable Device Dependent

1x HDMI 2.1b3x DisplayPort 2.1b

Bus Interface

IGP

PCIe 5.0 x16

Other

Launch Price

—

1,999 USD

Production

Active

Predecessor

HD Graphics-M

GeForce 40

Successor

—

GeForce 60

View Arc 140T Mobile Details View GeForce RTX 5090 Details

GPU Comparison

Intel Arc 140T Mobile

GeForce RTX 5090

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

Analysis: Intel Arc 140T Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

Related Graphics Cards

Related Comparisons