Intel Arc 140T Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER Comparison

The Intel Arc 140T Mobile and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER occupy opposite ends of the graphics hardware spectrum. The Arc 140T is an integrated solution designed for thin-and-light laptops, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is a discrete, high-power desktop card. The recorded data shows a massive gap in raw compute, memory bandwidth, and physical design, making direct competition almost moot. However, a comparative analysis still clarifies what each product offers within its intended segment, based strictly on the specifications and benchmark measurements available in the database.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains only one recorded benchmark result for the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER: a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6269.5. The Intel Arc 140T Mobile has no recorded benchmark scores, so no direct head-to-head measurements exist between these two GPUs. The average benchmark score for the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is 6270, rounded from the single recorded result. This places the NVIDIA card in the 36th percentile of all GPUs in the database, which is a moderate standing, not a top-tier ranking. The nearest rival to the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, according to the data, is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, with an identical average score of 6270, showing a 0% delta. The AMD FirePro W600 scores 6223, which is 0.8% lower, while the NVIDIA Quadro K620 scores 6282, which is 0.2% higher. The AMD Radeon R7 M350 scores 6327, which is 0.9% higher. These deltas are all within one percentage point, indicating that the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER sits in a very tight cluster of comparable scores, despite the wide variety of underlying architectures.

Since the Arc 140T has no benchmark entries, its performance cannot be quantified relative to the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. The wins count in the head-to-head section is zero for both products, reflecting the absence of any direct test data. What can be stated is that the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, with a 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, would theoretically process graphics workloads at a rate far exceeding the Arc 140T’s 4.813 TFLOPS, but this is a specification comparison, not a measured benchmark. The only numeric performance evidence in the database is the Steel Nomad score for the NVIDIA card, which shows it performing almost exactly at the level of the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102. That parity suggests that, in this specific DX12 test, the newer card offers no measurable advantage over its predecessor, at least within the margin of the recorded data. The Arc 140T cannot be placed on this scale due to missing measurements.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide between these two GPUs is substantial. The Intel Arc 140T Mobile uses the Arrow Lake-H chip, built on the Xe-LPG+ architecture, part of the Arc Graphics-M generation for mobile devices. It is fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2350 MHz. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses the GB203 chip, based on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, also on a 5 nm TSMC process, but with far higher clocks: a base of 2295 MHz and a boost of 2452 MHz. The transistor count for the Intel chip is listed as unknown, while the NVIDIA chip contains 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 120.6 million per square millimeter. The Intel die size is also unknown, so no comparison of physical size is possible from the data.

Memory architecture is a major differentiator. The Intel Arc 140T uses system-shared memory, with a system-dependent bandwidth and no dedicated VRAM. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Memory speed for the NVIDIA card is listed at 1750 MHz, with 28 Gbps effective. This gives the discrete card a dedicated, high-speed memory pool that the integrated Intel solution cannot match, since it borrows from system RAM. The Intel card’s memory clock is also listed as system shared, meaning it has no independent memory clock.

The compute resources differ by an order of magnitude. The Arc 140T has 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units (TMUs), 32 render output units (ROPs), and 8 ray tracing cores. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 8960 shading units, 280 TMUs, 96 ROPs, 70 ray tracing cores, and 280 tensor cores. The Intel card has no listed tensor cores, while the NVIDIA card includes them for AI workloads. Pixel rate for the Arc 140T is 75.20 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 150.4 GTexel/s. For the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, pixel rate is 235.4 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 686.6 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 4.813 TFLOPS for Intel and 43.94 TFLOPS for NVIDIA. FP16 performance is 9.626 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio for Intel, while NVIDIA achieves 43.94 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, meaning the NVIDIA card does not halve its throughput for FP16.

Power and physical design show the intended use cases. The Intel Arc 140T has a TDP of 35 W and is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with no slot width, no power connectors, and a portable-device-dependent display output. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a 350 W TDP, is dual-slot, requires a single 16-pin power connector, and uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface. Its display outputs are 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. The Intel card’s bus interface is also IGP, meaning it is not a removable component. The NVIDIA card measures 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 48 mm in width, while the Intel card has no listed dimensions. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API compatibility is identical.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher FP32 compute throughput?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers 43.94 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the Intel Arc 140T Mobile provides 4.813 TFLOPS. This is a 9.1x difference in favor of NVIDIA, based on the recorded specifications.

Q: Does the Intel Arc 140T Mobile have dedicated video memory?

A: No. The Intel Arc 140T Mobile uses system shared memory for both size and type, with bandwidth listed as system dependent. In contrast, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the power consumption of each GPU?

A: The Intel Arc 140T Mobile has a TDP of 35 W, suitable for integrated use. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a TDP of 350 W, requiring a discrete power connector and a dual-slot cooler.

Q: Are there any benchmark scores for the Intel Arc 140T Mobile in the database?

A: No. The database lists zero benchmark results for the Intel Arc 140T Mobile. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has one recorded score of 6269.5 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12.

Q: How does the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER compare to its nearest rival in measured performance?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER scores 6269.5, which is nearly identical to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102’s average score of 6270, a 0% delta. The AMD FirePro W600 is 0.8% lower, and the NVIDIA Quadro K620 is 0.2% higher.

Q: Which GPU has more ray tracing cores?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 70 ray tracing cores, while the Intel Arc 140T Mobile has 8. The NVIDIA card also includes 280 tensor cores, which the Intel card does not list.

The Verdict

The data indicates that these two products belong to entirely different market tiers. The Intel Arc 140T Mobile is an integrated solution with a 35 W TDP, shared system memory, and modest compute resources: 1024 shading units, 4.813 TFLOPS FP32, and 8 ray tracing cores. It is designed for mobile devices where power efficiency and compactness are priorities, as evidenced by its IGP slot width and portable-device-dependent outputs. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, with a 350 W TDP, 16 GB GDDR7, 8960 shading units, 70 ray tracing cores, and 43.94 TFLOPS FP32, is a high-end discrete card for desktop systems. Its physical dimensions, dual-slot design, and PCIe 5.0 x16 interface confirm this positioning.

For a user requiring maximum graphics throughput, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is the only choice based on the recorded numbers. Its FP32 rate is over nine times higher, its pixel rate is 235.4 GPixel/s versus 75.20 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 686.6 GTexel/s versus 150.4 GTexel/s. The memory bandwidth advantage is even starker: 896.0 GB/s dedicated versus system dependent. However, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER’s benchmark percentile is only 36, and its Steel Nomad score matches the older RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 exactly, so it does not represent a generational leap in this specific test. The Intel Arc 140T Mobile cannot be evaluated in the same way due to missing benchmark data, but its specifications clearly show a product aimed at basic graphics acceleration, not high-end gaming or compute workloads.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER also holds a 70-ray-tracing-core advantage and includes tensor cores, which the Intel card lacks entirely. This makes the NVIDIA card suitable for AI-accelerated tasks, while the Intel card offers no such capability in the database. The launch MSRP for the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is 749 USD, which is the only pricing information available; the Intel card has no listed launch MSRP. For any workload requiring dedicated GDDR7 memory, high shader counts, or substantial power delivery, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is the clear pick. For an ultra-portable device where the GPU must share system memory and stay within a 35 W envelope, the Intel Arc 140T Mobile is the only viable option in this comparison.

Specification Differences

The following table lists only the fields where the two GPUs differ, based on the recorded data.

| Specification | Intel Arc 140T Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER |

|----------------|----------------------|----------------------------------|

| Series | null | GeForce 50-series |

| Manufacturer | Intel | NVIDIA |

| Chip | Arrow Lake-H | GB203 |

| Architecture | Xe-LPG+ | Blackwell 2.0 |

| Generation | Arc Graphics-M (Arrow Lake) | GeForce 50 |

| Transistors | unknown | 45,600 million |

| Die Size | unknown | 378 mm² |

| Transistor Density | null | 120.6M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 300 MHz | 2295 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2350 MHz | 2452 MHz |

| Memory Clock | System Shared | 1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective |

| Memory Size | System Shared | 16 GB |

| Memory Type | System Shared | GDDR7 |

| Memory Bus Width | System Shared | 256 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 896.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 1024 | 8960 |

| TMUs | 64 | 280 |

| ROPs | 32 | 96 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 8 | 70 |

| Tensor Cores | null | 280 |

| Pixel Rate | 75.20 GPixel/s | 235.4 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 150.4 GTexel/s | 686.6 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 4.813 TFLOPS | 43.94 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 9.626 TFLOPS (2:1) | 43.94 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 35 W | 350 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | null | 1x 16-pin |

| Bus Interface | IGP | PCIe 5.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.1b 3x DisplayPort 2.1b |

| Length | null | 304 mm 12 inches |

| Height | null | 137 mm 5.4 inches |

| Width | null | 48 mm 1.9 inches |

| Release Date | 2025-01-12 | 2025-12-31 |

| Predecessor | HD Graphics-M | null |

| Launch MSRP | null | 749 USD |

| Benchmark Scores | none | 6269.5 (Steel Nomad DX12) |

| Percentile | 50 | 36 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 0 | 6270 |

The two GPUs share identical API support: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Both use a 5 nm TSMC process and are listed as Active in production status. All other fields are either identical or null in both entries.