AMD Xbox Series X 6nm GPU vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Xbox Series X 6nm GPU and the Lisuan Tech LX PRO. Both cards sit at the 50th percentile among all GPUs tracked, with an average benchmark score of zero in the current dataset. This means the comparison must be drawn from the architectural and specification records rather than from measured performance deltas.

The raw compute figures show a clear separation. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 performance, while the AMD Xbox Series X 6nm GPU produces 12.15 TFLOPS. That puts the LX PRO at roughly double the FP32 throughput of the console-derived GPU. In FP16, the LX PRO reaches 49.15 TFLOPS versus 24.29 TFLOPS for the AMD part, again nearly a 2:1 ratio. The LX PRO also doubles the pixel throughput, rated at 192.0 GPixel/s versus 116.8 GPixel/s, and slightly edges the AMD chip in texture rate, 384.0 GTexel/s versus 379.6 GTexel/s.

Memory capacity strongly favors the LX PRO. The Lisuan card carries 24 GB of GDDR6 across a 192-bit bus, while the AMD Xbox part has 10 GB of GDDR6 on a 320-bit interface. Despite the narrower bus, the AMD GPU records higher memory bandwidth at 560.0 GB/s, versus 432.0 GB/s for the LX PRO. The clock speeds explain this: the AMD memory runs at 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective transfer, while the LX PRO memory runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective transfer. The wider 320-bit bus on the AMD chip compensates for the lower per-pin rate.

Shader resources split differently. The LX PRO has 6144 shading units and 96 ROPs, while the AMD GPU has 3328 shading units and 64 ROPs. Texture mapping units are closer: 208 for AMD versus 192 for the LX PRO. The LX PRO thus carries nearly double the shader count and 50% more ROPs, which aligns with its higher pixel rate and FP32 output.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Xbox Series X 6nm GPU wins in memory bandwidth. Its 560.0 GB/s figure exceeds the LX PRO's 432.0 GB/s by a substantial margin, a direct result of the 320-bit memory bus. For workloads that are bandwidth-bound, such as high-resolution texture streaming or certain compute kernels that repeatedly access large datasets, the AMD part holds an advantage despite its lower raw compute.

The AMD GPU also wins on physical footprint considerations. It measures 301 mm in length, 151 mm in height, and 151 mm in width, whereas the LX PRO is more compact at 248 mm length, 118 mm height, and 48 mm width. The LX PRO is a dual-slot card, while the AMD console GPU has no recorded slot width. The LX PRO uses a single 16-pin power connector with a 550 W suggested PSU, while the AMD part has no recorded power connector or PSU recommendation.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO wins in compute throughput across every FP32 and FP16 metric. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 figures are roughly double the AMD part's 12.15 TFLOPS and 24.29 TFLOPS. The LX PRO also wins on pixel fill rate, 192.0 GPixel/s versus 116.8 GPixel/s, and on memory capacity, 24 GB versus 10 GB. The LX PRO's texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s narrowly beats the AMD GPU's 379.6 GTexel/s, a difference of about 1%.

The LX PRO offers more display outputs, with 4x DisplayPort 1.4a, while the AMD console GPU has a single HDMI 2.1 output. The LX PRO also supports Vulkan 1.3, whereas the AMD part is limited to Vulkan 1.2. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6.

Power consumption favors the AMD part. The Xbox Series X 6nm GPU is rated at 200 W TDP, while the LX PRO draws 225 W. The difference is modest, 25 W, but the AMD GPU delivers its bandwidth advantage at lower power.

The Verdict

The recorded data indicates two GPUs built for different purposes. The AMD Xbox Series X 6nm GPU, released on 2024-10-14, is a console-derived part with a 200 W TDP, 10 GB memory, and a 560.0 GB/s bandwidth figure. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO, released on 2026-03-16, is a discrete expansion card with 225 W TDP, 24 GB memory, and a 432.0 GB/s bandwidth figure. The LX PRO's launch MSRP is not recorded in the database.

For workloads that depend on raw shader throughput, FP32 compute, or pixel fill rate, the LX PRO is the stronger choice. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate are roughly double the AMD part's figures. The 24 GB memory capacity also provides far more headroom for large datasets or high-resolution asset loads.

For workloads that depend on memory bandwidth, the AMD Xbox Series X 6nm GPU holds the edge. Its 560.0 GB/s bandwidth is 30% higher than the LX PRO's 432.0 GB/s, which can matter in bandwidth-sensitive scenarios. The AMD part also consumes 25 W less power.

The production status for both is Active. The AMD part has a 6 nm process node from TSMC with 15,300 million transistors on the Scarlett 6nm chip, while the LX PRO also uses a 6 nm process from TSMC but its transistor count is unrecorded. The LX PRO's chip is designated 7G105 under the TrueGPU architecture in the 7G100 generation.

The database shows both cards at the 50th percentile with no average benchmark scores, so any direct performance ranking cannot be derived from measured results. The specification comparison suggests the LX PRO targets compute-heavy workloads, while the AMD console GPU targets bandwidth-sensitive scenarios within its power envelope.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO records 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, while the AMD Xbox Series X 6nm GPU records 12.15 TFLOPS. The LX PRO is roughly double the AMD part.

Q: How do the memory bandwidth figures compare?

A: The AMD Xbox Series X 6nm GPU has 560.0 GB/s bandwidth from a 320-bit bus with 1750 MHz memory (14 Gbps effective). The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 432.0 GB/s from a 192-bit bus with 2250 MHz memory (18 Gbps effective). The AMD part is higher despite its narrower bus.

Q: What is the memory capacity difference?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory. The AMD Xbox Series X 6nm GPU has 10 GB of GDDR6 memory. The LX PRO offers 14 GB more capacity.

Q: Which GPU has a higher pixel fill rate?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO records 192.0 GPixel/s with 96 ROPs. The AMD Xbox Series X 6nm GPU records 116.8 GPixel/s with 64 ROPs. The LX PRO is ahead by roughly 64%.

Q: What are the power consumption figures?

A: The AMD Xbox Series X 6nm GPU is rated at 200 W TDP. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO is rated at 225 W TDP. The AMD part draws 25 W less.

Q: Which GPU supports newer API versions?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3, while the AMD Xbox Series X 6nm GPU supports Vulkan 1.2.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Xbox Series X 6nm GPU uses the Scarlett 6nm chip built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture, produced by TSMC on a 6 nm process. The chip integrates 15,300 million transistors, and the card is classified under the Console GPU (Microsoft) generation. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip built on the TrueGPU architecture, also produced by TSMC on a 6 nm process, under the 7G100 generation. The LX PRO's transistor count is not recorded.

Shading unit counts differ significantly. The LX PRO has 6144 shading units, while the AMD part has 3328. Texture mapping units are close, 192 on the LX PRO versus 208 on the AMD GPU, but ROP counts favor the LX PRO at 96 versus 64. Neither GPU records RT cores or tensor cores.

Memory subsystems diverge in configuration. The AMD Xbox Series X 6nm GPU uses a 320-bit bus with 10 GB GDDR6 at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective), yielding 560.0 GB/s. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses a 192-bit bus with 24 GB GDDR6 at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective), yielding 432.0 GB/s. The wider bus on the AMD part compensates for its lower memory clock.

Physical specifications differ. The AMD card measures 301 mm length, 151 mm height, and 151 mm width, with a single HDMI 2.1 output and no recorded slot width, power connector, or bus interface. The LX PRO measures 248 mm length, 118 mm height, and 48 mm width, is dual-slot, uses a 1x 16-pin power connector with a 550 W suggested PSU, and connects via PCIe 4.0 x16. The LX PRO has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

API support is identical for DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The LX PRO adds Vulkan 1.3 support, while the AMD part is limited to Vulkan 1.2. Both GPUs are listed as Active in production status.

The release dates are separated by roughly 17 months, with the AMD part appearing on 2024-10-14 and the LX PRO on 2026-03-16. The AMD GPU has a recorded launch MSRP of 599 USD, while the LX PRO has no recorded launch MSRP. The power envelope is close, 200 W for the AMD part and 225 W for the LX PRO, but the compute and memory capacity differences are substantial.