AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no shared benchmark scores for the AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU and the NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell. The Ryzen Z2 Go GPU has no recorded benchmark entries, while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has a substantial set of measured results. This absence of overlapping test data means a direct score-for-score comparison is not possible from the recorded measurements.

The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell's recorded performance places it at the 70th percentile among all GPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 25,269. Its nearest rivals in the database include the AMD Radeon RX 6700M at an average score of 25,633 (1.4% ahead), the AMD Radeon Pro W5700 at 25,726 (1.8% ahead), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile at 25,740 (1.8% ahead), and the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile at 24,763 (2.0% behind). These deltas place the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell in a tightly clustered performance band, within roughly 2% of three comparable mobile and workstation-class parts.

The Ryzen Z2 Go GPU sits at the 50th percentile in the database, with an average benchmark score of zero and no rival entries. Its position indicates that no measured performance data exists for this part in the current database records. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell, by contrast, shows clear results across multiple tests: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 2,374.5, Geekbench OpenCL at 106,087, Geekbench Vulkan at 113,865, Passmark G3D at 20,049, and Passmark GPU Compute at 8,396. The Passmark suite also records DirectX 9 at 241, DirectX 11 at 174, DirectX 10 at 122, DirectX 12 at 80, and G2D at 1,303.

The closest recorded comparison comes from the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell's rivalry data. The NVIDIA part delivers an average score that trails the RX 6700M by 1.4%, trails the Pro W5700 by 1.8%, and trails the RTX 3080 Ti Mobile by 1.8%, while leading the RTX A5000 Mobile by 2.0%. These margins are narrow, indicating that the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell performs in a similar class to these established parts. The Ryzen Z2 Go GPU, lacking any benchmark records, cannot be positioned against these rivals with numerical precision.

The data shows a clear asymmetry: one part has extensive measured results, the other has none. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell's percentile ranking of 70 versus the Ryzen Z2 Go GPU's 50 reflects this gap, though the Ryzen's ranking is based on absence of data rather than a computed score. Any head-to-head conclusion must rely on architectural specifications rather than benchmark outcomes.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different design lineages. The AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU uses the Rembrandt+ chip built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture, fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell uses the GB206 chip on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The process node difference is one nanometer, which contributes to the NVIDIA part's higher transistor density: 121.0 million transistors per square millimeter versus 63.0 million for the AMD part.

Transistor counts differ markedly. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell packs 21,900 million transistors on a die size of 181 mm², while the Ryzen Z2 Go GPU contains 13,100 million transistors on a larger die of 208 mm². The smaller die with more transistors gives the NVIDIA part a density advantage of roughly 92%. The AMD chip's larger physical area with fewer transistors indicates a less dense design.

Compute resources show substantial divergence. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell carries 4,352 shading units, 136 texture mapping units, and 48 render output units. The Ryzen Z2 Go GPU has 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. The NVIDIA part has more than five times the shading units and nearly three times the ROPs. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell also includes 34 ray tracing cores and 136 tensor cores, while the Ryzen Z2 Go GPU lists 12 ray tracing cores and no tensor cores.

Clock speeds favor the AMD part in boost frequency. The Ryzen Z2 Go GPU boosts to 2,700 MHz with a base clock of 800 MHz, while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell boosts to 1,957 MHz with a base of 982 MHz. Despite the lower boost clock, the NVIDIA part achieves far higher throughput: 17.03 TFLOPS FP32 versus 4.147 TFLOPS for the AMD part, a 4.1x advantage. The FP16 rates also diverge: the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell delivers 17.03 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio, while the Ryzen Z2 Go GPU delivers 8.294 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio.

Memory subsystems differ in type and speed. The Ryzen Z2 Go GPU uses 16 GB of LPDDR5 on a 128-bit bus with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth and 6.4 Gbps effective memory speed. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell uses 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth and 18 Gbps effective memory speed. Both have the same capacity and bus width, but the GDDR7 memory provides 2.8x the bandwidth.

The NVIDIA part's pixel rate of 93.94 GPixel/s and texture rate of 266.2 GTexel/s exceed the AMD part's 86.40 GPixel/s and 129.6 GTexel/s. The texture rate gap is particularly large, at roughly 2.1x. Power consumption differs as well: the Ryzen Z2 Go GPU has a 28 W TDP, while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has a 70 W TDP. The NVIDIA part also specifies a 250 W suggested PSU, a PCIe 5.0 x8 interface, dual-slot dimensions of 167 mm by 69 mm by 20 mm, and four mini-DisplayPort 2.1b outputs. The AMD part lists only a single USB Type-C display output and no slot width or power connector details.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has 4,352 shading units, compared to 768 shading units on the AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU.

Q: How do their memory bandwidths compare?

A: The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell delivers 288.0 GB/s using GDDR7 memory, while the Ryzen Z2 Go GPU provides 102.4 GB/s using LPDDR5. Both use a 128-bit bus and have 16 GB capacity.

Q: What is the transistor density difference?

A: The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has 121.0 million transistors per mm² across a 181 mm² die, while the Ryzen Z2 Go GPU has 63.0 million per mm² across a 208 mm² die.

Q: Does the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell have tensor cores?

A: Yes, it includes 136 tensor cores. The Ryzen Z2 Go GPU lists no tensor cores in the database.

Q: What process nodes do they use?

A: The Ryzen Z2 Go GPU uses a 6 nm TSMC process, and the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell uses a 5 nm TSMC process.

Q: What is the FP32 performance gap?

A: The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell achieves 17.03 TFLOPS FP32, while the Ryzen Z2 Go GPU achieves 4.147 TFLOPS, a 4.1x difference.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU | NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 5 nm |

| Transistors | 13,100 million | 21,900 million |

| Die Size | 208 mm² | 181 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 63.0M / mm² | 121.0M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 800 MHz | 982 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2700 MHz | 1957 MHz |

| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | GDDR7 |

| Memory Speed | 6.4 Gbps effective | 18 Gbps effective |

| Memory Bandwidth | 102.4 GB/s | 288.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 768 | 4352 |

| TMUs | 48 | 136 |

| ROPs | 32 | 48 |

| RT Cores | 12 | 34 |

| Tensor Cores | None | 136 |

| Pixel Rate | 86.40 GPixel/s | 93.94 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 129.6 GTexel/s | 266.2 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 4.147 TFLOPS | 17.03 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 8.294 TFLOPS (2:1) | 17.03 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 28 W | 70 W |

| Slot Width | Not specified | Dual-slot |

| Suggested PSU | Not specified | 250 W |

| Bus Interface | Not specified | PCIe 5.0 x8 |

| Display Outputs | 1x USB Type-C | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1b |

| Dimensions | Not specified | 167 mm x 69 mm x 20 mm |

| Release Date | 2024-12-31 | 2025-08-10 |

| Percentile | 50 | 70 |

The Verdict

The data indicates that the NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is the stronger performer by every measurable specification. Its FP32 throughput of 17.03 TFLOPS is 4.1x that of the AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU, and its texture rate of 266.2 GTexel/s is 2.1x higher. The memory bandwidth advantage of 288.0 GB/s versus 102.4 GB/s gives it a clear edge in bandwidth-bound workloads. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell also carries 34 ray tracing cores and 136 tensor cores, features that the Ryzen Z2 Go GPU lacks entirely. Its 70th percentile ranking against all GPUs, supported by an average benchmark score of 25,269 and a performance cluster within 2% of several established rivals, confirms its position as a capable workstation part.

The AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU, by contrast, has no benchmark scores in the database and sits at the 50th percentile by default. Its 28 W TDP suggests a power-lean design, and its 2,700 MHz boost clock is higher than the NVIDIA part's 1,957 MHz. The 16 GB LPDDR5 memory provides less bandwidth but matches the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell in capacity. The AMD part's single USB Type-C display output and lack of tensor cores limit its applicability for compute-heavy or multi-display workstation setups.

Users requiring measured performance should select the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell, as its recorded results demonstrate competitive standing among nearby rivals. The Ryzen Z2 Go GPU's lack of benchmark data means its real-world performance cannot be verified from the database. The NVIDIA part's higher TDP of 70 W versus 28 W indicates a trade-off between power draw and throughput, but with no performance records for the AMD part, the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell remains the only option with substantiated capabilities. The choice is straightforward: the data supports the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell for any application where computational output matters.