AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU vs NVIDIA Jetson T5000 Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU

CORE STATE Rembrandt+
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2700 MHz
TDP 28 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 2.0
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

Jetson T5000

CORE STATE GB10B
VRAM 128 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1575 MHz
TDP 120 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

Analysis: AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU vs NVIDIA Jetson T5000

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for both GPUs shows a complete absence of benchmark scores, win counts, and performance deltas. Neither the AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU nor the NVIDIA Jetson T5000 has any entries in the benchmark database, and the head-to-head comparison table is empty. Both parts sit at the 50th percentile among all GPUs tracked by the database, with an average benchmark score of zero for each.

This means no direct performance comparison can be drawn from measured workloads. The absence of data is itself a finding: the AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU, released in late 2024, and the NVIDIA Jetson T5000, released in mid-2025, have not been subjected to the database's standardized test suite. Without recorded scores, any claim about relative speed, efficiency, or capability would be unsupported speculation.

What the data does show is a stark contrast in theoretical compute ceilings. The Jetson T5000 delivers 8.064 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, while the Ryzen Z2 Go GPU delivers 4.147 TFLOPS. That is a 1.94x advantage for the NVIDIA part. In FP16, the gap narrows slightly: the Jetson T5000 maintains a flat 8.064 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), while the AMD part reaches 8.294 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). The AMD GPU actually edges ahead by 2.9% in peak FP16, though this figure relies on a packed math path that may not reflect real-world FP16 workloads.

Pixel fill rates favor the AMD part. The Ryzen Z2 Go GPU achieves 86.40 GPixel/s versus 50.40 GPixel/s on the Jetson T5000, a 71.4% advantage. Texture fill rates are nearly identical: 129.6 GTexel/s for AMD and 126.0 GTexel/s for NVIDIA, a 2.9% difference in favor of the Ryzen chip. These ratios suggest the AMD GPU leans toward rasterization-heavy tasks, while the NVIDIA part allocates more of its silicon to compute and AI acceleration.

Memory bandwidth shows a substantial NVIDIA lead. The Jetson T5000 offers 273.2 GB/s across a 256-bit LPDDR5X interface, versus 102.4 GB/s on a 128-bit LPDDR5 bus for the AMD part. That is a 2.67x bandwidth advantage for NVIDIA. The Jetson T5000 also carries 128 GB of memory versus 16 GB on the Ryzen Z2 Go GPU, an 8x capacity difference. These memory figures will dominate any workload that is bandwidth-bound or requires large model residency.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural lineages. The AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU uses the Rembrandt+ chip, built on RDNA 2.0, and belongs to the Console GPU generation. It is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with 13,100 million transistors on a 208 mm² die. The transistor density works out to 63.0 million transistors per square millimeter.

The NVIDIA Jetson T5000 uses the GB10B chip, built on Blackwell, and belongs to the Server Blackwell (Bxx) generation. It is fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 391 mm². The transistor count is listed as unknown, and no density figure is recorded. The process node advantage goes to NVIDIA: 5 nm versus 6 nm, though both parts come from TSMC.

Core configurations differ dramatically. The Jetson T5000 packs 2,560 shading units, 80 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output units. It also includes 20 ray tracing cores and 96 tensor cores. The Ryzen Z2 Go GPU has 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, with 12 ray tracing cores and no tensor cores listed. The NVIDIA part has 3.3x more shading units, 1.67x more TMUs, and 1.67x more ray tracing cores, while matching the AMD part at 32 ROPs.

Clock behavior separates the two as well. The AMD GPU runs at a base of 800 MHz and boosts to 2700 MHz, a 3.38x clock range. The Jetson T5000 runs at a base of 1386 MHz and boosts to 1575 MHz, a modest 1.14x range. Despite the higher boost clock on the AMD part, the NVIDIA part's much larger core count drives its higher peak FP32 throughput.

Memory technology differs by generation. The Ryzen Z2 Go GPU uses LPDDR5 at an effective 6.4 Gbps, while the Jetson T5000 uses LPDDR5X at an effective 8.5 Gbps. The NVIDIA part's bus width is double that of the AMD part: 256 bit versus 128 bit. The Jetson T5000 also has a higher memory clock, listed at 1067 MHz versus 800 MHz.

API support splits the two into different deployment categories. The AMD part supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The NVIDIA part lists N/A for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan, indicating it is not designed for conventional graphics APIs. The Jetson T5000 also has no display outputs, while the AMD part offers a single USB Type-C output.

Power envelopes reflect their different roles. The AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU has a TDP of 28 W and requires no power connectors. The NVIDIA Jetson T5000 has a TDP of 120 W, also with no power connectors, but lists a suggested PSU of 300 W. The Jetson T5000 is an integrated graphics package (IGP) with dimensions of 87 mm by 100 mm by 15 mm, and it connects via PCIe 5.0 x8. The AMD part has no recorded slot width, bus interface, or dimensions.

The Verdict

The data points to two different deployment targets. The AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU, with its 28 W TDP, RDNA 2.0 graphics stack, DirectX 12 Ultimate support, and single USB Type-C output, is positioned for low-power client devices that need conventional display and graphics API compatibility. The NVIDIA Jetson T5000, with its 120 W TDP, Blackwell architecture, 96 tensor cores, 128 GB of memory, and no display outputs, is positioned for server-side compute and AI workloads where graphics output is irrelevant.

For raw FP32 compute, the Jetson T5000 leads by 1.94x. For FP16 peak throughput, the AMD part leads by 2.9%, but only through a packed 2:1 path. For pixel fill rate, the AMD part leads by 71.4%. For texture fill rate, the parts are nearly tied, with AMD ahead by 2.9%. For memory bandwidth and capacity, the NVIDIA part leads by 2.67x and 8x, respectively.

The absence of actual benchmark scores means no real-world workload comparison can be made. The recorded data shows theoretical specifications only. A buyer selecting between these two would be choosing between a graphics-oriented, low-power chip and a compute-oriented, high-memory server part. The AMD part supports the graphics APIs that the NVIDIA part explicitly does not support, while the NVIDIA part carries tensor cores, a PCIe 5.0 interface, and 128 GB of unified memory that the AMD part lacks.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU | NVIDIA Jetson T5000 |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Blackwell |

| Process node | 6 nm | 5 nm |

| Die size | 208 mm² | 391 mm² |

| Transistors | 13,100 million | unknown |

| Transistor density | 63.0M / mm² | null |

| Base clock | 800 MHz | 1386 MHz |

| Boost clock | 2700 MHz | 1575 MHz |

| Memory clock | 800 MHz 6.4 Gbps effective | 1067 MHz 8.5 Gbps effective |

| Memory size | 16 GB | 128 GB |

| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |

| Bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |

| Bandwidth | 102.4 GB/s | 273.2 GB/s |

| Shading units | 768 | 2560 |

| TMUs | 48 | 80 |

| ROPs | 32 | 32 |

| RT cores | 12 | 20 |

| Tensor cores | null | 96 |

| Pixel rate | 86.40 GPixel/s | 50.40 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 129.6 GTexel/s | 126.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 4.147 TFLOPS | 8.064 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 8.294 TFLOPS (2:1) | 8.064 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 28 W | 120 W |

| Slot width | null | IGP |

| Suggested PSU | null | 300 W |

| Bus interface | null | PCIe 5.0 x8 |

| Display outputs | 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |

| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | N/A |

| OpenGL | 4.6 | N/A |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | N/A |

| Dimensions | null | 87 mm x 100 mm x 15 mm |

| Release date | 2024-12-31 | 2025-08-26 |

| Predecessor | null | Server Hopper |

| Successor | null | Server Rubin |

| Launch MSRP | null | 2,999 USD |

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The NVIDIA Jetson T5000 has 2,560 shading units, while the AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU has 768.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference between the two?

A: The Jetson T5000 delivers 273.2 GB/s over a 256-bit LPDDR5X bus, while the Ryzen Z2 Go GPU delivers 102.4 GB/s over a 128-bit LPDDR5 bus.

Q: Does the AMD GPU support DirectX?

A: Yes, the Ryzen Z2 Go GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), along with OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4. The Jetson T5000 lists N/A for all three APIs.

Q: What is the TDP of each GPU?

A: The AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU has a TDP of 28 W. The NVIDIA Jetson T5000 has a TDP of 120 W and a suggested PSU of 300 W.

Q: Does the Jetson T5000 have tensor cores?

A: Yes, the Jetson T5000 has 96 tensor cores. The Ryzen Z2 Go GPU has no tensor cores listed.

Q: What memory capacity does each GPU offer?

A: The Ryzen Z2 Go GPU has 16 GB of LPDDR5. The Jetson T5000 has 128 GB of LPDDR5X, an 8x difference.

Q: Which GPU has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU boosts to 2700 MHz, while the NVIDIA Jetson T5000 boosts to 1575 MHz.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
Z2 Go GPU
Jetson T5000
Core Specs
Shading Units
768
2,560 +233.3%
Shaders
768
2,560 +233.3%
TMUs
48
80 +66.7%
ROPs
32
32 0.0%
Compute Units
12
SM Count
20
Clocks
Base Clock
800 MHz
1386 MHz
Boost Clock
2700 MHz
1575 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz 6.4 Gbps effective
1067 MHz 8.5 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
16 GB
128 GB
VRAM (MB)
16,384
131,072 +700.0%
Memory Type
LPDDR5
LPDDR5X
Memory Bus
128 bit
256 bit
Bandwidth
102.4 GB/s
273.2 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
8 MB
32 MB
L3 Cache
16 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
50.40 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
129.6 GTexel/s
126.0 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
4.147 TFLOPS
8.064 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
259.2 GFLOPS (1:16)
4.032 TFLOPS (1:2)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
8.294 TFLOPS (2:1)
8.064 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
12
20 +66.7%
Tensor Cores
96
Power
TDP
28 W
120 W
TDP (W)
28
120 +328.6%
Suggested PSU
300 W
Power Connectors
None
None
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
Blackwell
GPU Name
Rembrandt+
GB10B
Generation
Console GPU (AMD)
Server Blackwell (Bxx)
Process Size
6 nm
5 nm
Transistors
13,100 million
unknown
Die Size
208 mm²
391 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
63.0M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
OpenCL
2.0
3.0
CUDA
11.0
Shader Model
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Length
87 mm 3.4 inches
Height
100 mm 3.9 inches
Outputs
1x USB Type-C
No outputs
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x8
Other
Launch Price
2,999 USD
Production
Active
Active
Predecessor
Server Hopper
Successor
Server Rubin
View Ryzen Z2 Go GPU Details View Jetson T5000 Details