AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no direct benchmark scores for either the AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU or the Lisuan Tech LX PRO. Both entries show an average benchmark score of zero, and the head-to-head benchmark table is empty. Consequently, there are no measured wins for either part in this comparison. The absence of data reflects that neither product has been exercised through the standard benchmark suite at the time of this record.

Both GPUs sit at the 50th percentile against all GPUs in the database, meaning the recorded data places them at the median of the tracked population. That percentile value is identical for both, so the database does not currently differentiate them by rank. Without benchmark scores, any numerical comparison of performance must rely on the specification sheets rather than measured outcomes.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO posts a substantially higher FP32 figure of 24.58 TFLOPS against the AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU's 1.638 TFLOPS. That is a 15.0 times advantage in raw single-precision compute. In FP16, the Lisuan part reaches 49.15 TFLOPS versus 3.277 TFLOPS for the AMD part, again a 15.0 times difference. Pixel throughput favors the Lisuan part at 192.0 GPixel/s versus 25.60 GPixel/s, a 7.5 times gap. Texture rate stands at 384.0 GTexel/s for the Lisuan part versus 51.20 GTexel/s for the AMD part, a 7.5 times difference.

Memory bandwidth delivers a similarly lopsided comparison. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth, while the AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU manages 102.4 GB/s. That gives the Lisuan part a 4.2 times bandwidth advantage. The Lisuan card also carries 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192 bit bus, whereas the AMD part uses 16 GB of LPDDR5 on a 128 bit bus.

The AMD part does hold advantages in power efficiency and physical footprint. Its 15 W TDP stands against the Lisuan card's 225 W TDP, a 15.0 times difference in favor of the AMD GPU. The AMD part is a 7 nm TSMC chip with 2,400 million transistors on a 163 mm² die, while the Lisuan part uses a 6 nm TSMC process with unknown transistor count and die size. The Ryzen Z2 A GPU requires no external power connector and no suggested PSU, whereas the Lisuan card specifies a 1x 16-pin power connector and a 550 W suggested PSU.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher raw FP32 compute?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS, which is 15.0 times the 1.638 TFLOPS of the AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU.

Q: What memory configurations do the two GPUs use?

A: The AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU uses 16 GB of LPDDR5 on a 128 bit bus with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192 bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: How do the power requirements differ?

A: The AMD part has a 15 W TDP. The Lisuan part has a 225 W TDP, requires a 1x 16-pin power connector, and lists a 550 W suggested PSU.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same DirectX version?

A: Yes. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The AMD part supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan part supports Vulkan 1.3.

Q: What are the physical dimensions of the Lisuan Tech LX PRO?

A: The Lisuan card measures 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. It is a dual-slot card. No dimensions are recorded for the AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 6,144 shading units, compared to 512 for the AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU. The Lisuan part also has 192 texture mapping units and 96 render output units, versus 32 TMUs and 16 ROPs for the AMD part.

Where Each One Wins

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO wins decisively in every compute and memory metric recorded in the database. Its FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS places it far ahead of the AMD part's 1.638 TFLOPS, which suits workloads dominated by raw shader math, large matrix operations, or high-resolution rendering. The 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, combined with 24 GB of GDDR6, gives it a substantial buffer for texture-heavy scenes, large datasets, and multi-monitor output. Its 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate and 384.0 GTexel/s texture rate indicate strong fill-rate capabilities for high-resolution rasterization.

The Lisuan card also provides four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, enabling multi-display configurations directly from the GPU. Its PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface matches modern motherboard connectivity. The dual-slot cooler and 225 W TDP suggest a desktop-oriented card designed for sustained load in a full-size chassis, with the 550 W suggested PSU indicating a system-level power envelope appropriate for a dedicated graphics card.

The AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU wins in power efficiency and compact integration. Its 15 W TDP is 15.0 times lower than the Lisuan card, making it suitable for low-power systems where cooling and power delivery are constrained. The single USB Type-C display output points to a minimal connectivity footprint. The 7 nm process node with 2,400 million transistors on a 163 mm² die gives a transistor density of 14.7M per mm², which the database records. The AMD part's 8 ray tracing cores provide hardware RT support despite the lower overall compute, though no benchmark data confirms RT performance.

For use cases defined by the recorded specifications, the Lisuan Tech LX PRO is the choice for high-throughput graphics tasks, while the AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU fits scenarios where power draw and physical simplicity are the primary constraints.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU | Lisuan Tech LX PRO |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | TrueGPU |

| Generation | Console GPU (AMD) | 7G100 |

| Process node | 7 nm | 6 nm |

| Transistors | 2,400 million | unknown |

| Die size | 163 mm² | unknown |

| Transistor density | 14.7M / mm² | null |

| Base clock | 1000 MHz | null |

| Boost clock | 1600 MHz | null |

| Memory clock | 800 MHz 6.4 Gbps effective | 2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective |

| Memory size | 16 GB | 24 GB |

| Memory type | LPDDR5 | GDDR6 |

| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory bandwidth | 102.4 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading units | 512 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 32 | 192 |

| ROPs | 16 | 96 |

| RT cores | 8 | null |

| Pixel rate | 25.60 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 51.20 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 1.638 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 3.277 TFLOPS (2:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 15 W | 225 W |

| Slot width | null | Dual-slot |

| Power connectors | null | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | null | 550 W |

| Bus interface | null | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display outputs | 1x USB Type-C | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Length | null | 248 mm 9.8 inches |

| Height | null | 118 mm 4.6 inches |

| Width | null | 48 mm 1.9 inches |

| Release date | 2024-12-31 | 2026-03-16 |

The two cards share DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6 support. Both are manufactured by TSMC, though on different nodes. Both show Active production status. Neither entry lists a launch MSRP.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU uses the Van Gogh chip with RDNA 2.0 architecture, belonging to the Console GPU (AMD) generation. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip with TrueGPU architecture, belonging to the 7G100 generation. These are fundamentally different design families with no shared architectural lineage in the database.

The process technology differs by one node step: the AMD part is built on TSMC 7 nm, while the Lisuan part uses TSMC 6 nm. The AMD die measures 163 mm² and contains 2,400 million transistors, yielding a density of 14.7M transistors per mm². The Lisuan die size and transistor count are not recorded in the database.

Compute resource distribution differs sharply. The Lisuan part packs 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The AMD part has 512 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs. The AMD part includes 8 ray tracing cores, while the Lisuan entry lists no RT core count. Neither part lists tensor cores.

The memory architecture reflects their different positioning. The AMD part uses 16 GB of LPDDR5 on a 128 bit bus, with memory clocked at 800 MHz and 6.4 Gbps effective. The Lisuan part uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192 bit bus, with memory clocked at 2250 MHz and 18 Gbps effective. The resulting bandwidth gap is 432.0 GB/s versus 102.4 GB/s.

Clock behavior also diverges. The AMD part has a recorded base clock of 1000 MHz and a boost clock of 1600 MHz. The Lisuan part has no base or boost clock values in the database. The AMD part's FP16 rate of 3.277 TFLOPS is listed as a 2:1 ratio relative to its FP32 rate, and the Lisuan part's FP16 rate of 49.15 TFLOPS is likewise listed at a 2:1 ratio.

API support differs only in Vulkan version: the AMD part supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan part supports Vulkan 1.3. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Lisuan card exposes four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, while the AMD part exposes a single USB Type-C output. The Lisuan card is dual-slot with a 1x 16-pin power connector and a 550 W suggested PSU, while the AMD part has no recorded slot width, power connector, or suggested PSU. The Lisuan physical dimensions are 248 mm by 118 mm by 48 mm. Release dates differ by over a year: the AMD part shipped on 2024-12-31, and the Lisuan part on 2026-03-16.