AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 SE Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU

CORE STATE Van Gogh
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1600 MHz
TDP 15 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 2.0
nm
PROCESS 7 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 5090 SE

CORE STATE GB202
VRAM 24 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2377 MHz
TDP 500 W
BUS WIDTH 384 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026

Analysis: AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 SE

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no direct benchmark scores for either the AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU or the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 SE, and no head-to-head benchmark results are available. Both parts have an identical percentile rank of 50 against all GPUs in the database, meaning neither unit has a measured performance advantage over the other in the current dataset. The average benchmark score for both is zero, so no direct numerical comparison of gaming or compute performance can be drawn from the recorded measurements. What can be compared are the architectural specifications, raw throughput figures, and feature sets, which show a massive gap in theoretical capability between the two designs.

On raw compute throughput, the NVIDIA part lists 66.94 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the AMD part lists 1.638 TFLOPS. That places the RTX 5090 SE at roughly 40.9 times the FP32 figure of the Ryzen Z2 A GPU. In FP16, the NVIDIA card also lists 66.94 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, while the AMD chip lists 3.277 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. Pixel throughput shows a similar gulf: the RTX 5090 SE delivers 380.3 GPixel/s versus 25.60 GPixel/s for the AMD part, a factor of about 14.9. Texture rate compares at 1,045.9 GTexel/s versus 51.20 GTexel/s, roughly 20.4 times higher on the NVIDIA side.

Memory bandwidth is another decisive split. The RTX 5090 SE has 1.34 TB/s of bandwidth, while the Ryzen Z2 A GPU has 102.4 GB/s. That is a difference of roughly 13.1 times in favor of the NVIDIA card. The memory capacity difference is smaller but still notable: 24 GB on the NVIDIA card versus 16 GB on the AMD part. Clock speeds also favor the NVIDIA card. The RTX 5090 SE has a base clock of 1740 MHz and a boost clock of 2377 MHz, while the AMD chip has a base of 1000 MHz and a boost of 1600 MHz. Memory clocks differ as well, with the NVIDIA card running at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) and the AMD part at 800 MHz (6.4 Gbps effective).

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from entirely different architectural lineages. The AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU uses the Van Gogh chip built on RDNA 2.0, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 SE uses the GB202 chip built on Blackwell 2.0. The process nodes differ: the AMD part is fabricated on a 7 nm process at TSMC, and the NVIDIA part is fabricated on a 5 nm process, also at TSMC. The transistor counts are dramatically different. The AMD chip contains 2,400 million transistors on a 163 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 14.7 million transistors per square millimeter. The NVIDIA chip contains 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die, giving a density of 122.9 million per square millimeter. That is a density difference of roughly 8.4 times, and a total transistor count difference of about 38.4 times.

The core configurations reflect their different purposes. The AMD chip has 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, 16 render output units, and 8 ray tracing cores. The NVIDIA chip has 14,080 shading units, 440 TMUs, 160 ROPs, 110 ray tracing cores, and 440 tensor cores. The AMD part has no tensor cores listed, while the NVIDIA part includes them. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The memory types differ fundamentally: the AMD chip uses LPDDR5 on a 128-bit bus, while the NVIDIA card uses GDDR7 on a 384-bit bus.

Power and physical specifications diverge sharply. The AMD chip has a TDP of 15 W, while the NVIDIA card has a TDP of 500 W. The NVIDIA card is dual-slot, uses a single 16-pin power connector, and recommends a 900 W power supply. The AMD chip lists no slot width, no power connectors, and no suggested PSU. The NVIDIA card uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface, while the AMD chip lists no bus interface. Display outputs differ as well: the AMD chip has a single USB Type-C output, while the NVIDIA card has 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b outputs. The NVIDIA card has physical dimensions of 267 mm in length, 111 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. The AMD chip lists no physical dimensions.

Where Each One Wins

The data shows that the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 SE wins decisively in every measured specification category. It delivers higher FP32 and FP16 throughput, higher pixel fill rate, higher texture fill rate, more memory capacity, faster memory type, wider memory bus, higher bandwidth, more shading units, more TMUs, more ROPs, more ray tracing cores, and the only tensor cores between the two. It also has higher base and boost clocks, higher memory clocks, and a newer architecture on a smaller process node.

The AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU wins in power efficiency on paper. Its 15 W TDP is dramatically lower than the 500 W TDP of the NVIDIA card, representing a 33.3 times smaller power envelope. The AMD chip also has a smaller die size at 163 mm² versus 750 mm², which is about 4.6 times smaller. For systems where power draw and physical footprint are the primary constraints, the AMD part presents a far lighter thermal and electrical load. The AMD chip also uses a single USB Type-C display output, which may simplify cabling in compact designs.

The NVIDIA card wins in every performance-oriented category without exception. Its FP32 throughput is roughly 40.9 times higher, its texture rate is about 20.4 times higher, its pixel rate is about 14.9 times higher, and its memory bandwidth is about 13.1 times higher. The RTX 5090 SE also has 14,080 shading units versus 512, 440 TMUs versus 32, 160 ROPs versus 16, and 110 ray tracing cores versus 8. The tensor core count of 440 on the NVIDIA side has no counterpart on the AMD side. The NVIDIA card also has a larger memory pool of 24 GB versus 16 GB, and a wider 384-bit bus versus 128-bit.

Specification Differences

The two parts differ on nearly every specification field in the database.

  • Chip: Van Gogh (AMD) versus GB202 (NVIDIA)
  • Architecture: RDNA 2.0 versus Blackwell 2.0
  • Generation: Console GPU (AMD) versus GeForce 50
  • Process node: 7 nm versus 5 nm
  • Transistors: 2,400 million versus 92,200 million
  • Die size: 163 mm² versus 750 mm²
  • Transistor density: 14.7M / mm² versus 122.9M / mm²
  • Base clock: 1000 MHz versus 1740 MHz
  • Boost clock: 1600 MHz versus 2377 MHz
  • Memory clock: 800 MHz 6.4 Gbps effective versus 1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective
  • Memory size: 16 GB versus 24 GB
  • Memory type: LPDDR5 versus GDDR7
  • Memory bus width: 128 bit versus 384 bit
  • Memory bandwidth: 102.4 GB/s versus 1.34 TB/s
  • Shading units: 512 versus 14,080
  • TMUs: 32 versus 440
  • ROPs: 16 versus 160
  • Ray tracing cores: 8 versus 110
  • Tensor cores: not listed versus 440
  • Pixel rate: 25.60 GPixel/s versus 380.3 GPixel/s
  • Texture rate: 51.20 GTexel/s versus 1,045.9 GTexel/s
  • FP32: 1.638 TFLOPS versus 66.94 TFLOPS
  • FP16: 3.277 TFLOPS (2:1) versus 66.94 TFLOPS (1:1)
  • TDP: 15 W versus 500 W
  • Slot width: not listed versus dual-slot
  • Power connectors: not listed versus 1x 16-pin
  • Suggested PSU: not listed versus 900 W
  • Bus interface: not listed versus PCIe 5.0 x16
  • Display outputs: 1x USB Type-C versus 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
  • Dimensions: not listed versus 267 mm length, 111 mm height, 40 mm width
  • Release date: 2024-12-31 versus 2025-12-31
  • Predecessor: not listed versus GeForce 40
  • Successor: not listed versus GeForce 60
  • Launch MSRP: not listed versus 1,499 USD

The two parts share identical API support for DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Both are produced by TSMC and both are listed as Active in production status. The NVIDIA card has a predecessor and successor listed, while the AMD part has neither. The NVIDIA part carries a launch MSRP of 1,499 USD; no launch MSRP is recorded for the AMD part.

FAQ

Q: How does the FP32 compute performance compare between the two GPUs?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 SE lists 66.94 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU lists 1.638 TFLOPS. The NVIDIA card's FP32 figure is approximately 40.9 times higher.

Q: What are the memory capacity and bandwidth differences?

A: The NVIDIA card has 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 384-bit bus with 1.34 TB/s bandwidth. The AMD chip has 16 GB of LPDDR5 memory on a 128-bit bus with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth. The NVIDIA card has roughly 13.1 times the bandwidth and 1.5 times the capacity.

Q: Which GPU has more ray tracing cores?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 SE has 110 ray tracing cores. The AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU has 8 ray tracing cores.

Q: What is the TDP of each GPU?

A: The AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU has a TDP of 15 W. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 SE has a TDP of 500 W.

Q: Does the AMD part have tensor cores?

A: No tensor cores are listed for the AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 SE lists 440 tensor cores.

Q: What process nodes are used for each chip?

A: The AMD chip is fabricated on a 7 nm process at TSMC. The NVIDIA chip is fabricated on a 5 nm process, also at TSMC.

Q: What display outputs does each GPU provide?

A: The AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU provides 1x USB Type-C. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 SE provides 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
Z2 A GPU
RTX 5090 SE
Core Specs
Shading Units
512
14,080 +2650.0%
Shaders
512
14,080 +2650.0%
TMUs
32
440 +1275.0%
ROPs
16
160 +900.0%
Compute Units
8
SM Count
110
Clocks
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1740 MHz
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
2377 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz 6.4 Gbps effective
1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
16 GB
24 GB
VRAM (MB)
16,384
24,576 +50.0%
Memory Type
LPDDR5
GDDR7
Memory Bus
128 bit
384 bit
Bandwidth
102.4 GB/s
1.34 TB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
1024 KB
96 MB
L3 Cache
8 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
25.60 GPixel/s
380.3 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
51.20 GTexel/s
1,045.9 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
1.638 TFLOPS
66.94 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
102.4 GFLOPS (1:16)
1,045.9 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
3.277 TFLOPS (2:1)
66.94 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
8
110 +1275.0%
Tensor Cores
440
Power
TDP
15 W
500 W
TDP (W)
15
500 +3233.3%
Suggested PSU
900 W
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
Blackwell 2.0
GPU Name
Van Gogh
GB202
Generation
Console GPU (AMD)
GeForce 50
Process Size
7 nm
5 nm
Transistors
2,400 million
92,200 million
Die Size
163 mm²
750 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
14.7M / mm²
122.9M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.0
3.0
CUDA
12.0
Shader Model
6.8
6.9
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Length
267 mm 10.5 inches
Height
111 mm 4.4 inches
Outputs
1x USB Type-C
1x HDMI 2.1b3x DisplayPort 2.1b
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
1,499 USD
Production
Active
Active
Predecessor
GeForce 40
Successor
GeForce 60
View Ryzen Z2 A GPU Details View GeForce RTX 5090 SE Details