AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU

CORE STATE Van Gogh
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1600 MHz
TDP 15 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 2.0
nm
PROCESS 7 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER

CORE STATE GB203
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2452 MHz
TDP 350 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
N/A
6,269.5

Analysis: AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and neither item has wins recorded in the comparison field. This absence of direct measurement data means the two products cannot be ranked against each other through matched workload testing in the database.

However, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER does have a single recorded benchmark result. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, it scores 6269.5 points. Its average benchmark score across all recorded tests is 6270 points. This places it at the 36th percentile among all GPUs in the database.

The nearest rival data for the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER provides useful context. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 matches it exactly with an average score of 6270 and a 0 percent delta. The AMD FirePro W600 scores 6223, which is 0.8 percent lower. The NVIDIA Quadro K620 scores 6282, which is 0.2 percent higher than the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. The AMD Radeon R7 M350 scores 6327, which is 0.9 percent higher.

These small percentage differences indicate that the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER sits in a tightly packed performance cluster. The 0.2 percent gap between the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER and the Quadro K620 is within measurement noise for most workloads. The 0.9 percent gap to the Radeon R7 M350 is similarly narrow. Benchmark results indicate that the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers near-identical performance to its closest recorded competitors.

The AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU has no benchmark scores in the database. Its percentile ranking against all GPUs is 50, but this ranking exists without any supporting benchmark data. The average benchmark score is recorded as 0, and the nearest rivals array is empty. This means the database has no measured performance evidence for the Ryzen Z2 A GPU.

Given the massive architectural differences between the two products, the lack of direct comparison data leaves the performance relationship undefined. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a confirmed 6269.5 score in one test, while the Ryzen Z2 A GPU has no recorded scores. Any claims about which product wins in specific workloads would require fabricated data, which the database does not contain.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different manufacturers and use entirely different architectures. The AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU uses the Van Gogh chip with RDNA 2.0 architecture. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses the GB203 chip with Blackwell 2.0 architecture. These represent two distinct design philosophies from different generations of GPU technology.

The manufacturing process differs significantly. The AMD chip is built on a 7 nm process at TSMC, while the NVIDIA chip uses a 5 nm process, also at TSMC. The transistor counts reflect this process gap. The AMD Van Gogh chip contains 2,400 million transistors on a 163 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 14.7 million transistors per square millimeter. The NVIDIA GB203 chip contains 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 120.6 million per square millimeter.

The compute resources are dramatically different. The AMD GPU has 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, 16 raster output units, and 8 ray tracing cores. The NVIDIA GPU has 8,960 shading units, 280 texture mapping units, 96 raster output units, and 70 ray tracing cores. NVIDIA also includes 280 tensor cores, while the AMD product has no tensor core count recorded.

Clock speeds also diverge. The AMD GPU has a base clock of 1000 MHz and a boost clock of 1600 MHz. The NVIDIA GPU has a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2452 MHz. The NVIDIA boost clock is roughly 53 percent higher than the AMD boost clock.

Memory architecture differs in type and configuration. The AMD GPU uses 16 GB of LPDDR5 memory on a 128-bit bus with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The NVIDIA GPU also has 16 GB of memory, but uses GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 896.0 GB/s bandwidth. The NVIDIA memory bandwidth is approximately 8.75 times higher than the AMD memory bandwidth.

The API support is identical on paper. Both products support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The underlying hardware implementations differ, but the exposed API surface matches.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has measurable performance data, so its strengths can be described from the recorded numbers. The AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU has no benchmark data, so its strengths cannot be quantified from the database.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers 43.94 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 43.94 TFLOPS of FP16 compute with a 1:1 ratio. The pixel rate is 235.4 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 686.6 GTexel/s. These figures describe a high-throughput GPU capable of sustained heavy workloads. The 896 GB/s memory bandwidth supports large data transfers, which benefits high-resolution rendering and compute tasks that move substantial data.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER includes 280 tensor cores and 70 ray tracing cores. These hardware units accelerate AI workloads and ray-traced rendering. The 16-pin power connector and 350 W TDP indicate the power delivery requirements for such performance.

The AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU has a 15 W TDP, which is substantially lower than the NVIDIA product's 350 W TDP. The AMD GPU uses a USB Type-C display output, while the NVIDIA GPU uses a HDMI 2.1b port and three DisplayPort 2.1b outputs. The AMD GPU has a boost clock of 1600 MHz and delivers 1.638 TFLOPS of FP32 compute.

The AMD product is production status Active and was released on 2024-12-31, while the NVIDIA product is also Active and released on 2025-12-31. The database records a launch MSRP of 749 USD for the NVIDIA product. No launch MSRP is recorded for the AMD product.

Specification Differences

The two products differ across nearly every recorded specification field. The manufacturing process differs: 7 nm for AMD versus 5 nm for NVIDIA. The transistor count differs by a factor of 19: 2,400 million versus 45,600 million. Die size differs from 163 mm² to 378 mm². Transistor density rises from 14.7 million per mm² to 120.6 million per mm².

Clock speeds differ in both base and boost. AMD runs at 1000 MHz base and 1600 MHz boost. NVIDIA runs at 2295 MHz base and 2452 MHz boost. Memory clocks differ as well: AMD memory runs at 800 MHz with 6.4 Gbps effective, while NVIDIA memory runs at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective.

Memory type differs between LPDDR5 and GDDR7. The bus width doubles from 128 bit to 256 bit. Memory bandwidth jumps from 102.4 GB/s to 896.0 GB/s. Both products have 16 GB of memory, which is the one matching field in this category.

Compute unit counts differ substantially. Shading units go from 512 to 8,960. TMUs go from 32 to 280. ROPs go from 16 to 96. RT cores go from 8 to 70. Tensor cores exist only on the NVIDIA side with 280 units. Pixel rate rises from 25.60 GPixel/s to 235.4 GPixel/s. Texture rate rises from 51.20 GTexel/s to 686.6 GTexel/s. FP32 compute rises from 1.638 TFLOPS to 43.94 TFLOPS. FP16 compute rises from 3.277 TFLOPS (2:1) to 43.94 TFLOPS (1:1).

Power consumption differs by more than an order of magnitude. The AMD TDP is 15 W, while the NVIDIA TDP is 350 W. The slot width is null for AMD but Dual-slot for NVIDIA. The power connector is null for AMD but 1x 16-pin for NVIDIA. The bus interface is null for AMD but PCIe 5.0 x16 for NVIDIA. Physical dimensions are null for AMD but 304 mm by 137 mm by 48 mm for NVIDIA.

Display outputs differ: the AMD GPU has 1x USB Type-C, while the NVIDIA GPU has 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. The API support matches for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan. Both products are Active in production status.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER?

A: The database records an average benchmark score of 6270 for the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, based on its single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result of 6269.5 points.

Q: Does the database contain any benchmark scores for the AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU?

A: No. The Ryzen Z2 A GPU has an empty benchmarks array and an average benchmark score recorded as 0. The nearest rivals array is also empty.

Q: How does the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER compare to its nearest recorded rivals?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER matches the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 exactly at 6270 points. It trails the NVIDIA Quadro K620 by 0.2 percent and the AMD Radeon R7 M350 by 0.9 percent, while leading the AMD FirePro W600 by 0.8 percent.

Q: What is the transistor density difference between the two products?

A: The AMD Van Gogh chip has 14.7 million transistors per square millimeter, while the NVIDIA GB203 chip has 120.6 million transistors per square millimeter. The NVIDIA chip is roughly 8.2 times denser.

Q: What memory bandwidth does each product provide?

A: The AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU provides 102.4 GB/s from LPDDR5 memory on a 128-bit bus. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER provides 896.0 GB/s from GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus.

Q: What is the recorded launch MSRP for the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER?

A: The database lists a launch MSRP of 749 USD for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. No MSRP is recorded for the AMD product.

The Verdict

The recorded data supports only one clear conclusion: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has verified performance metrics, while the AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU has none. Users seeking a GPU with confirmed benchmark results should look at the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, which has a measured 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6269.5 and an average score of 6270.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER also carries architectural advantages that the data confirms. Its 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, 896.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, 70 ray tracing cores, and 280 tensor cores place it in a different performance class than the Ryzen Z2 A GPU. The 5 nm process, 45,600 million transistors, and PCIe 5.0 x16 interface reinforce this position.

The AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU presents a contrasting profile. Its 15 W TDP, 1.638 TFLOPS FP32 compute, and 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth describe a low-power part. The 7 nm process and 2,400 million transistors indicate a much smaller design. Without benchmark scores, the database cannot confirm how this product performs in any workload.

Users who need high throughput, ray tracing, AI acceleration, and multiple display outputs would find support in the NVIDIA product's recorded specifications. Users who need minimal power consumption and a single USB Type-C output would find the AMD product's specifications aligned with those needs, but with no performance evidence to validate expectations.

The percentile data reinforces this split. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER sits at the 36th percentile among all GPUs. The Ryzen Z2 A GPU sits at the 50th percentile, but this figure exists without supporting benchmark data, making it unverifiable.

The verdict from the database is straightforward: the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is the only product with measurable performance, and it delivers results consistent with its high-end specifications. The Ryzen Z2 A GPU remains an unmeasured product whose actual performance cannot be determined from available data.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
Z2 A GPU
RTX 5070 Ti SUPER
Core Specs
Shading Units
512
8,960 +1650.0%
Shaders
512
8,960 +1650.0%
TMUs
32
280 +775.0%
ROPs
16
96 +500.0%
Compute Units
8
—
Clocks
Base Clock
1000 MHz
2295 MHz
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
2452 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz 6.4 Gbps effective
1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
16 GB
16 GB
VRAM (MB)
16,384
16,384 0.0%
Memory Type
LPDDR5
GDDR7
Memory Bus
128 bit
256 bit
Bandwidth
102.4 GB/s
896.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
1024 KB
48 MB
L3 Cache
8 MB
—
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
—
Performance
Pixel Rate
25.60 GPixel/s
235.4 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
51.20 GTexel/s
686.6 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
1.638 TFLOPS
43.94 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
102.4 GFLOPS (1:16)
686.6 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
3.277 TFLOPS (2:1)
43.94 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
8
70 +775.0%
Tensor Cores
—
280
Power
TDP
15 W
350 W
TDP (W)
15
350 +2233.3%
Power Connectors
—
1x 16-pin
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
Blackwell 2.0
GPU Name
Van Gogh
GB203
Generation
Console GPU (AMD)
GeForce 50
Process Size
7 nm
5 nm
Transistors
2,400 million
45,600 million
Die Size
163 mm²
378 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
14.7M / mm²
120.6M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.0
3.0
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
—
Dual-slot
Length
—
304 mm 12 inches
Height
—
137 mm 5.4 inches
Outputs
1x USB Type-C
1x HDMI 2.1b 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
Bus Interface
—
PCIe 5.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
—
749 USD
Production
Active
Active
View Ryzen Z2 A GPU Details View GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER Details