AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU vs Intel Arc Pro A60 Comparison

AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU and Intel Arc Pro A60 occupy different positions in the database, with the Arc Pro A60 holding a much higher percentile rank. The Ryzen Z2 A GPU sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, while the Arc Pro A60 reaches the 88th percentile. The Arc Pro A60 also has recorded benchmark scores, whereas the Ryzen Z2 A GPU has none listed. This difference in data availability shapes the comparison, but the specification sheets provide enough detail for a methodical analysis.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU and the Intel Arc Pro A60. For the Intel Arc Pro A60, two recorded scores exist: a Geekbench OpenCL score of 63485 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 57166. These produce an average benchmark score of 60326. The Ryzen Z2 A GPU has no benchmark entries, so no comparable scores can be cited.

The Arc Pro A60’s average score places it near several rivals. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 scores 60347, which is a 0% delta from the Arc Pro A60. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 scores 60140, also a 0.3% delta. The AMD Radeon Pro W6600M scores 61896, which is 2.5% higher than the Arc Pro A60. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 58657, which is 2.8% lower. These deltas show that the Arc Pro A60 sits in a tight cluster of professional GPUs, within roughly 3% of each neighbor.

Because the Ryzen Z2 A GPU lacks benchmark scores, the head-to-head comparison relies on theoretical throughput figures derived from clock rates and core counts. The Arc Pro A60’s FP32 compute of 8.397 TFLOPS is roughly five times the Ryzen Z2 A GPU’s 1.638 TFLOPS. Texture rate tells a similar story: the Arc Pro A60 outputs 262.4 GTexel/s versus 51.20 GTexel/s for the Ryzen Z2 A GPU. Pixel rate also favors Intel, with 131.2 GPixel/s compared to 25.60 GPixel/s. These figures indicate a substantial performance gap in raw shader work, though the Ryzen Z2 A GPU operates at a far lower power envelope.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc Pro A60 wins in every measured or computed performance metric available in the database. Its FP32 throughput, texture fill rate, and pixel fill rate are all higher, and its memory bandwidth of 384.0 GB/s dwarfs the Ryzen Z2 A GPU’s 102.4 GB/s. The Arc Pro A60 also has more shading units (2048 versus 512), more texture mapping units (128 versus 32), more raster output units (64 versus 16), and twice the ray tracing cores (16 versus 8). For workloads that scale with raw shader count, memory bandwidth, or ray tracing, the Arc Pro A60 is the clear choice.

The Ryzen Z2 A GPU wins in power efficiency and portability. Its TDP is 15 W, while the Arc Pro A60 draws 130 W. That difference means the Ryzen Z2 A GPU can operate in systems with minimal cooling and no auxiliary power connectors, whereas the Arc Pro A60 requires a 300 W suggested PSU. The Ryzen Z2 A GPU also uses a single USB Type-C display output, which suits compact or embedded designs. The Arc Pro A60 offers four DisplayPort 2.0 outputs, which supports multi-monitor professional setups. For a low-power, integrated-style GPU, the Ryzen Z2 A GPU has a niche; for sustained compute or graphics workloads, the Arc Pro A60 dominates.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs use different architectures from different vendors. The AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU is built on RDNA 2.0, while the Intel Arc Pro A60 uses Xe-HPG. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API feature levels match. However, the underlying designs diverge significantly.

The Ryzen Z2 A GPU uses a chip named Van Gogh, produced on a 7 nm process at TSMC. The die size is 163 mm² with 2,400 million transistors, giving a transistor density of 14.7 million per square millimeter. The Intel Arc Pro A60 uses a DG2-256 chip on a 6 nm process, also from TSMC. That die is larger at 269 mm² and packs 11,500 million transistors, for a density of 42.8 million per square millimeter. The Arc Pro A60’s higher density and larger die explain its much higher core counts.

Memory architecture also differs. The Ryzen Z2 A GPU uses 16 GB of LPDDR5 on a 128-bit bus, with memory clocks at 800 MHz and 6.4 Gbps effective. The Arc Pro A60 uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, with memory clocks at 2000 MHz and 16 Gbps effective. The Arc Pro A60’s wider bus and faster memory yield 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth, nearly four times the Ryzen Z2 A GPU’s 102.4 GB/s. The Ryzen Z2 A GPU has more memory capacity, but that capacity comes with a severe bandwidth penalty.

Ray tracing hardware exists on both, but the Arc Pro A60 has 16 ray tracing cores versus 8 on the Ryzen Z2 A GPU. Neither GPU lists tensor cores, so AI acceleration is not a differentiator in this comparison. The Arc Pro A60 also uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface, while the Ryzen Z2 A GPU has no listed bus interface, suggesting a more integrated or proprietary connection.

Specification Differences

Several specification fields differ between the two GPUs. The process node is 7 nm for AMD and 6 nm for Intel. Transistor count is 2,400 million versus 11,500 million. Die size is 163 mm² versus 269 mm². Transistor density is 14.7 million per square millimeter versus 42.8 million. Base clock is 1000 MHz for the Ryzen Z2 A GPU and 900 MHz for the Arc Pro A60, but boost clock is 1600 MHz versus 2050 MHz. Memory type is LPDDR5 versus GDDR6. Memory size is 16 GB versus 12 GB. Bus width is 128 bit versus 192 bit. Memory bandwidth is 102.4 GB/s versus 384.0 GB/s.

Shading units: 512 versus 2048. TMUs: 32 versus 128. ROPs: 16 versus 64. RT cores: 8 versus 16. Pixel rate: 25.60 GPixel/s versus 131.2 GPixel/s. Texture rate: 51.20 GTexel/s versus 262.4 GTexel/s. FP32: 1.638 TFLOPS versus 8.397 TFLOPS. FP16: 3.277 TFLOPS versus 16.79 TFLOPS, both with a 2:1 ratio. TDP: 15 W versus 130 W. Slot width: not listed for AMD, single-slot for Intel. Suggested PSU: not listed for AMD, 300 W for Intel. Bus interface: not listed for AMD, PCIe 4.0 x16 for Intel. Display outputs: 1x USB Type-C for AMD, 4x DisplayPort 2.0 for Intel.

The release dates also differ. The Ryzen Z2 A GPU has a release date of December 31, 2024, while the Arc Pro A60 launched on June 5, 2023. Both are marked as Active in production status. Neither has a listed launch MSRP.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The Intel Arc Pro A60 delivers 8.397 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU delivers 1.638 TFLOPS. The Arc Pro A60 is roughly five times faster in this metric.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does each GPU provide?

A: The AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU provides 102.4 GB/s from 16 GB of LPDDR5 on a 128-bit bus. The Intel Arc Pro A60 provides 384.0 GB/s from 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus.

Q: Which GPU supports ray tracing, and how many cores does each have?

A: Both GPUs support ray tracing. The AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU has 8 ray tracing cores, while the Intel Arc Pro A60 has 16 ray tracing cores.

Q: What are the TDP requirements for each GPU?

A: The AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU has a TDP of 15 W. The Intel Arc Pro A60 has a TDP of 130 W and requires a suggested PSU of 300 W.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same graphics APIs?

A: Yes. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: Which GPU has a higher percentile ranking in the database?

A: The Intel Arc Pro A60 ranks at the 88th percentile among all GPUs. The AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU ranks at the 50th percentile.

The Verdict

The database shows a clear performance hierarchy. The Intel Arc Pro A60 outperforms the AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU in every compute and memory bandwidth metric. Its FP32 throughput of 8.397 TFLOPS exceeds the Ryzen Z2 A GPU’s 1.638 TFLOPS by a wide margin. Texture rate, pixel rate, and memory bandwidth all favor Intel. The Arc Pro A60 also has more shading units, TMUs, ROPs, and ray tracing cores. Its 88th percentile rank versus the Ryzen Z2 A GPU’s 50th percentile reinforces that position, and its recorded average benchmark score of 60326 places it within 3% of several professional GPUs.

The AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU is not without merit. Its 15 W TDP makes it suitable for low-power environments, and its 16 GB memory capacity exceeds the Arc Pro A60’s 12 GB. The single USB Type-C output suggests a compact or embedded target, not a workstation. For workloads that prioritize power draw or memory capacity over bandwidth, the Ryzen Z2 A GPU has a place. For any task that benefits from raw shader performance, ray tracing, or high memory bandwidth, the Arc Pro A60 is the only choice between the two.

The data does not provide benchmark scores for the Ryzen Z2 A GPU, so the comparison rests on theoretical specifications. Those specifications show a GPU designed for minimal power consumption against a GPU designed for professional rendering and compute. Buyers selecting for performance should choose the Arc Pro A60. Buyers constrained by power or physical footprint should consider the Ryzen Z2 A GPU. The verdict is straightforward: the Intel Arc Pro A60 dominates in performance, while the AMD Ryzen Z2 A GPU wins on efficiency.