AMD Radeon Vega 10 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER Comparison

# AMD Radeon Vega 10 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER

These two GPUs represent opposite ends of the hardware spectrum: a 10-watt integrated graphics solution from 2019 versus a 350-watt discrete flagship-class card from the GeForce 50-series. The benchmark data tells a stark story, but the numbers also reveal how different test methodologies and workloads can produce surprisingly close percentile rankings despite vast architectural gaps.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The FACT PACK contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between these two cards, so the comparison must be drawn from their respective individual benchmark scores. The AMD Radeon Vega 10 Mobile posts a Geekbench OpenCL score of 6,476, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER achieves a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6,269.5. These are entirely different tests measuring different workloads—OpenCL compute versus DX12 gaming—so direct numerical comparison is not meaningful.

What is meaningful is how each card sits relative to its nearest rivals. The Vega 10 Mobile's score places it within 0.1% of the NVIDIA Quadro M5000M (6,481) and 0.3% behind the GeForce GT 555M (6,493). It also edges out the RTX PRO 5000 72 GB Blackwell by 1.1% (6,407). This suggests that in compute-oriented OpenCL tasks, the Vega 10 Mobile performs at a level comparable to older mid-range discrete GPUs, despite being an integrated part with shared system memory.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's Steel Nomad score of 6,269.5 is exactly tied with the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 (6,270, deltaPct 0). It sits 0.2% ahead of the Quadro K620 (6,282) and 0.8% ahead of the AMD FirePro W600 (6,223), while trailing the Radeon R7 M350 by 0.9% (6,327). This clustering suggests the benchmark result is highly test-specific, not necessarily reflecting the massive architectural superiority the RTX card should theoretically possess.

Where Each One Wins

The Vega 10 Mobile wins in scenarios where power efficiency and system integration matter most. With a 10 W TDP and no power connectors required, it can operate in thin-and-light laptops where a discrete GPU would be impossible. Its system-shared memory architecture eliminates the need for dedicated VRAM, and its 640 shading units with 40 TMUs and 8 ROPs deliver 1.665 TFLOPS FP32 performance. The data shows a 37th percentile ranking among all GPUs, which is remarkable for an integrated part.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER wins decisively in raw performance and feature support. Its 8,960 shading units, 280 TMUs, and 96 ROPs produce 43.94 TFLOPS FP32—26.4 times the Vega's compute throughput. The 896.0 GB/s memory bandwidth on a 256-bit GDDR7 interface dwarfs the Vega's system-dependent bandwidth. The RTX card also brings 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI workloads that the Vega cannot handle at all. Its 235.4 GPixel/s pixel rate and 686.6 GTexel/s texture rate are orders of magnitude beyond the Vega's 10.41 GPixel/s and 52.04 GTexel/s.

Architecture Differences

The Vega 10 Mobile uses the Raven-M chip built on GCN 5.0 architecture, fabricated by GlobalFoundries on a 14 nm process. It packs 4,940 million transistors into a 210 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 23.5 million per mm². The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses the GB203 chip with Blackwell 2.0 architecture, manufactured by TSMC on a 5 nm process. Its 45,600 million transistors occupy a 378 mm² die, achieving 120.6M transistors per mm²—more than five times the density of the Vega.

The Vega's 640 shading units operate at a base clock of 300 MHz with a boost of 1301 MHz, while the RTX card's 8,960 shading units run at 2295 MHz base and 2452 MHz boost. Memory configurations could not be more different: the Vega uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth, while the RTX card features 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus delivering 896.0 GB/s. The Vega supports FP16 at a 2:1 ratio (3.331 TFLOPS), whereas the RTX card achieves 43.94 TFLOPS FP16 at a 1:1 ratio, indicating different compute pipeline designs.

API support also diverges. The Vega supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The RTX card's PCIe 5.0 x16 interface versus the Vega's integrated bus connection further underscores the architectural gap. The Vega measures no physical dimensions because it is an IGP soldered to the motherboard, while the RTX card is a 304 mm dual-slot card with a 1x 16-pin power connector.

FAQ

Q: How does the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's performance compare to its closest rival?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER scores 6,269.5 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which is exactly equal to the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102's average score of 6,270. The deltaPct of 0 indicates they perform identically in this test.

Q: Is the AMD Radeon Vega 10 Mobile competitive with any discrete GPUs?

A: Yes, in Geekbench OpenCL the Vega 10 Mobile's 6,476 score is within 0.1% of the NVIDIA Quadro M5000M (6,481) and 0.3% of the GeForce GT 555M (6,493). It even outperforms the NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 72 GB Blackwell by 1.1%.

Q: What is the transistor density difference between these two GPUs?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER achieves 120.6M transistors per mm² on TSMC's 5 nm process, while the Vega 10 Mobile manages only 23.5M per mm² on GlobalFoundries' 14 nm process—a density advantage of roughly 5.1x for the newer NVIDIA chip.

Q: Which GPU supports more advanced DirectX features?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes features like hardware ray tracing via its 70 RT cores. The Vega 10 Mobile supports DirectX 12 (12_1) without dedicated RT hardware.

Q: How do the memory bandwidth numbers compare?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER provides 896.0 GB/s bandwidth via 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus. The Vega 10 Mobile relies on system-shared memory with bandwidth described as "system dependent," meaning it varies based on the host system's RAM configuration.

Q: What are the physical size differences?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER measures 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 48 mm in width, occupying a dual-slot form factor. The Vega 10 Mobile has no listed dimensions because it is an integrated graphics processor with no physical card.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon Vega 10 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |

| Process Node | 14 nm | 5 nm |

| Foundry | GlobalFoundries | TSMC |

| Transistors | 4,940 million | 45,600 million |

| Die Size | 210 mm² | 378 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 23.5M / mm² | 120.6M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 300 MHz | 2295 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1301 MHz | 2452 MHz |

| Memory Size | System Shared | 16 GB |

| Memory Type | System Shared | GDDR7 |

| Memory Bus | System Shared | 256 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 896.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 640 | 8,960 |

| TMUs | 40 | 280 |

| ROPs | 8 | 96 |

| RT Cores | None | 70 |

| Tensor Cores | None | 280 |

| Pixel Rate | 10.41 GPixel/s | 235.4 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 52.04 GTexel/s | 686.6 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 1.665 TFLOPS | 43.94 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 3.331 TFLOPS (2:1) | 43.94 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 10 W | 350 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Bus Interface | IGP | PCIe 5.0 x16 |

| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |

| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b |

| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |

| Release Date | 2019-01-07 | 2025-12-31 |

| Launch MSRP | None | 749 USD |

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split based on use case. The AMD Radeon Vega 10 Mobile is for systems where power draw and physical space are the primary constraints. Its 10 W TDP, lack of power connectors, and integrated form factor make it suitable for portable devices that need basic GPU acceleration. Its 37th percentile ranking against all GPUs, despite being an IGP from 2019, indicates it punches above its weight in compute tasks relative to its power envelope.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is for anyone needing maximum rendering performance, ray tracing, or AI acceleration. Its 43.94 TFLOPS FP32, 70 RT cores, and 280 tensor cores provide capabilities entirely absent from the Vega. The 896.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 16 GB GDDR7 capacity make it suited for high-resolution gaming and professional workloads. Its 36th percentile ranking in Steel Nomad is test-specific and does not reflect its overall capability advantage.

The decision comes down to environment: the Vega belongs in ultraportable laptops where battery life and thermals are critical, while the RTX card belongs in desktop systems with adequate cooling and power delivery. The 5 nm process and 120.6M transistors per mm² density of the RTX card represent a generational leap in manufacturing that the 14 nm Vega cannot match. No user would reasonably choose between these two for the same task—they serve entirely different segments of the hardware landscape.