AMD Radeon RX 9070 vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data presents an unusual comparison. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 has a full suite of ten benchmark results, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no recorded benchmark scores at all. This means the RX 9070 wins every measurable category by default, but the LX PRO's positioning rests entirely on its specification sheet.

The RX 9070 demonstrates clear strengths in raw compute workloads. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 131,539 points indicates strong general-purpose compute performance, and its Passmark G3D score of 25,381 places it above many established graphics cards. The Vulkan score of 58,705 further confirms solid API-level performance. These results place the RX 9070 at the 69th percentile among all GPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 23,877.

The LX PRO, by contrast, has an average benchmark score of 0 and sits at the 50th percentile, entirely due to missing data. Its architecture, labeled "TrueGPU," suggests a different design philosophy, but without measurements, the database cannot confirm any performance claims. The card's 24 GB memory capacity is its primary distinguishing feature, exceeding the RX 9070's 16 GB, but memory size alone does not translate into benchmark victories.

For use-case analysis, the RX 9070 wins every scenario where benchmark data matters: DirectX 12 gaming, OpenCL compute, Vulkan workloads, and general 3D rendering. The LX PRO's theoretical advantage lies in memory-heavy tasks such as large dataset loading or high-resolution texture caching, but the database contains no evidence to validate this advantage.

Architecture Differences

The two cards diverge fundamentally in their underlying designs. The RX 9070 uses the Navi 48 chip built on RDNA 4.0 architecture, fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It integrates 53,900 million transistors across a 357 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 151.0 million per square millimeter. The LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip with "TrueGPU" architecture, built on a 6 nm process, also at TSMC. Its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown in the database.

Memory configurations differ substantially. The RX 9070 employs 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 644.6 GB/s bandwidth. The LX PRO doubles capacity to 24 GB of GDDR6 but narrows the bus to 192-bit, resulting in 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. This tradeoff means the RX 9070 moves data 49% faster per second, while the LX PRO holds more data locally.

Compute unit layouts also diverge. The RX 9070 has 3,584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, 128 raster output units, and 56 dedicated ray tracing cores. The LX PRO counters with 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, but no ray tracing cores are listed. The higher shading unit count suggests the LX PRO may excel in parallel compute, yet its pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s trails the RX 9070's 322.6 GPixel/s, and its texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s falls behind 564.5 GTexel/s.

Clock speeds favor the RX 9070. It operates at a base clock of 1330 MHz, a boost clock of 2520 MHz, and a game clock of 2070 MHz. The LX PRO lists no base, boost, or game clocks, only a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). This missing data prevents direct frequency comparisons.

Interface and connectivity also differ. The RX 9070 uses PCIe 5.0 x16 and outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1a. The LX PRO uses PCIe 4.0 x16 and provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a, with no HDMI port. Power delivery requires 2x 8-pin connectors on the RX 9070 versus a single 16-pin on the LX PRO. Both cards are dual-slot designs with a suggested 550 W power supply. The LX PRO measures 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width; the RX 9070's dimensions are not recorded.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear but lopsided verdict. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 is the only card with verified performance measurements. Its benchmark scores, including a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result of 6,290 and a Passmark G3D score of 25,381, establish a concrete performance baseline. Its nearest rivals in the database, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER (average score 24,170, 1.2% ahead), AMD Radeon RX 6800S (24,063, 0.8% ahead), and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z (23,736, 0.6% behind), all fall within a narrow band around its average score of 23,877. This indicates the RX 9070 performs at a level consistent with those established cards.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO cannot be verified. With zero benchmark scores and an average score of 0, the database has no evidence of its real-world performance. Its 24 GB memory capacity and 6,144 shading units suggest potential for specific workloads, but these specifications remain unvalidated. The 50th percentile ranking is a placeholder, not a measurement.

Users seeking a card with proven performance in DirectX 12, Vulkan, OpenCL, and general 3D workloads should select the RX 9070. Users requiring maximum memory capacity for large datasets may consider the LX PRO, but they must accept that no benchmark data supports its performance claims. The RX 9070 also offers faster memory bandwidth, higher pixel and texture rates, and greater FP32 compute at 36.13 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS. The LX PRO's FP16 throughput of 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) exceeds the RX 9070's 36.13 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), which may matter for specific half-precision workloads.

FAQ

Q: Which card has more memory?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory, while the AMD Radeon RX 9070 has 16 GB.

Q: Which card has higher memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9070 delivers 644.6 GB/s bandwidth, compared to 432.0 GB/s for the Lisuan Tech LX PRO.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each card?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9070 has an average benchmark score of 23,877. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has an average benchmark score of 0, as no benchmark results are recorded.

Q: How does the RX 9070 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RX 9070's average score is 1.2% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER, 0.8% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6800S, 0.6% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z, and 1.1% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile.

Q: Does the LX PRO support ray tracing?

A: The database lists no ray tracing cores for the Lisuan Tech LX PRO. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 has 56 dedicated ray tracing cores.

Q: What display outputs does each card provide?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9070 provides 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1a. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a and no HDMI output.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark array in the database is empty, meaning no direct comparative tests between these two cards exist. However, the RX 9070's individual benchmark scores provide a full picture, while the LX PRO has none.

In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the RX 9070 scores 6,290 points. This test measures modern DirectX 12 gaming performance, and the result indicates solid capability for current-generation titles. The LX PRO has no corresponding score.

Geekbench OpenCL shows the RX 9070 at 131,539 points, demonstrating strong compute throughput for general GPU workloads. Geekbench Vulkan records 58,705 points, showing competent Vulkan API performance. Passmark tests further detail the RX 9070's profile: DirectX 10 at 141, DirectX 11 at 281, DirectX 12 at 74, DirectX 9 at 343, G2D at 1,280, G3D at 25,381, and GPU compute at 14,737.

These numbers establish the RX 9070 as a well-rounded card across multiple API generations. The Passmark G3D score of 25,381 positions it just above the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z (23,736, 0.6% behind) and slightly below the AMD Radeon RX 6800S (24,063, 0.8% ahead) and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER (24,170, 1.2% ahead). This tight grouping confirms the RX 9070 performs within a well-known performance tier.

The LX PRO's empty benchmark list means every head-to-head comparison defaults to the RX 9070. The specification sheet shows the LX PRO with higher shading unit count (6,144 vs. 3,584) and more memory (24 GB vs. 16 GB), but these advantages remain theoretical without test results. The RX 9070's higher pixel rate (322.6 GPixel/s vs. 192.0 GPixel/s) and texture rate (564.5 GTexel/s vs. 384.0 GTexel/s) suggest it processes rasterized frames faster, even with fewer shading units.

FP32 compute favors the RX 9070 at 36.13 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS, a 47% advantage. FP16 compute reverses the comparison: the LX PRO delivers 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) versus the RX 9070's 36.13 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). Half-precision workloads, such as certain AI inference tasks, may benefit from the LX PRO's higher FP16 throughput, but no benchmarks confirm this.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every recorded specification. The RX 9070 uses a 4 nm process; the LX PRO uses 6 nm. Transistor counts are 53,900 million for the RX 9070 and unknown for the LX PRO. Die size is 357 mm² for the RX 9070 and unknown for the LX PRO. Transistor density is 151.0M per mm² for the RX 9070 and not listed for the LX PRO.

Memory: 16 GB GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus with 644.6 GB/s bandwidth for the RX 9070, versus 24 GB GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth for the LX PRO. Clock speeds: the RX 9070 has base 1330 MHz, boost 2520 MHz, game 2070 MHz, and memory 2518 MHz (20.1 Gbps effective). The LX PRO lists no base, boost, or game clocks, only memory at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Compute units: 3,584 shading units, 224 TMUs, 128 ROPs, and 56 RT cores for the RX 9070; 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, 96 ROPs, and no RT cores for the LX PRO. Pixel rates: 322.6 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s. Texture rates: 564.5 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s. FP32: 36.13 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS. FP16: 36.13 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1).

Power and physical specs: both are dual-slot with 550 W suggested PSU, but the RX 9070 uses 2x 8-pin connectors while the LX PRO uses 1x 16-pin. The RX 9070 has a 220 W TDP; the LX PRO has 225 W. Bus interface: PCIe 5.0 x16 for the RX 9070, PCIe 4.0 x16 for the LX PRO. Display outputs: 1x HDMI 2.1b plus 3x DisplayPort 2.1a for the RX 9070; 4x DisplayPort 1.4a for the LX PRO. API support: both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, but the RX 9070 supports Vulkan 1.4 while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3. Dimensions are listed only for the LX PRO: 248 mm length, 118 mm height, 48 mm width. Release dates differ: the RX 9070 launched on 2025-03-05, and the LX PRO is dated 2026-03-16. The RX 9070 has a launch MSRP of 549 USD.