AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 Comparison

AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows that the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP has two benchmark scores available, while the Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 has no recorded benchmark results in the database. This absence of data for Intel’s part makes direct numerical comparison impossible. However, the AMD card’s performance can be placed in context through its aggregate score and percentile ranking.

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP delivers an average benchmark score of 63830, which places it in the 89th percentile among all GPUs tracked in the database. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 88183, and its Geekbench Vulkan score is 39476. These two results show a large gap between OpenCL and Vulkan workloads, with the OpenCL score being more than double the Vulkan score. That pattern indicates strong general compute performance but comparatively weaker graphics API performance in the Vulkan path, at least in the measured tests.

Looking at nearest rivals in the database, the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP sits very close to several other GPUs. The NVIDIA CMP 30HX has an average score of 63842, which is essentially identical to the AMD card’s 63830, with a delta of 0 percent. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M scores 63775, a delta of 0.1 percent ahead of the RX 9060 XT LP, meaning the RX 9060 XT LP trails that mobile part by a negligible margin. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 scores 63693, which is 0.2 percent behind the RX 9060 XT LP, so the RX 9060 XT LP holds a slight edge there. The AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 scores 64212, which puts it 0.6 percent ahead of the RX 9060 XT LP. These deltas are all within a fraction of a percent, indicating that the RX 9060 XT LP occupies a tightly packed performance tier where small variations in workload can flip the ordering.

The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 has an average benchmark score of 0 and a percentile ranking of 50, with no nearest rivals listed and no individual test scores. The database shows no benchmark runs for this part, so no wins can be attributed to either side in a head-to-head sense. The AMD card has at least two recorded data points; the Intel card has none.

Architecture Differences

The architectural split between these two GPUs is stark, reflecting different design goals and manufacturing approaches. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP uses the Navi 44 chip based on the RDNA 4.0 architecture, belonging to the Navi IV generation within the Radeon RX 9000 series. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with 29,700 million transistors packed into a die size of 199 mm². That yields a transistor density of 149.2 million transistors per square millimeter.

The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 uses the Ponte Vecchio chip based on Generation 12.5 architecture, from the Data Center GPU (Ponte Vecchio) generation. It is fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel, with 100,000 million transistors spread across a die size of 1280 mm². That gives a transistor density of 78.1 million transistors per square millimeter. The Intel chip has more than three times the total transistor count, but its much larger die and older process node result in roughly half the transistor density of the AMD part.

Clock behavior also diverges sharply. The AMD card has a base clock of 1380 MHz, a boost clock of 3050 MHz, and a game clock of 2450 MHz. The Intel card has a base clock of 1000 MHz and a boost clock of 1550 MHz, with no game clock listed. The AMD part runs at significantly higher frequencies, which helps offset its lower raw shader count.

Memory architecture is another major differentiator. The AMD card uses 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 322.3 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel card uses 48 GB of HBM2e memory on an enormous 8192-bit bus, delivering 1.23 TB/s of bandwidth. The Intel part offers three times the capacity and nearly four times the bandwidth, but the AMD card’s GDDR6 implementation is far simpler and more conventional for a consumer-oriented product.

The compute units also differ. The AMD card has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units, plus 32 ray tracing cores. The Intel card has 7168 shading units, 448 texture mapping units, 56 ray tracing cores, and 0 raster operation units. The Intel part has far more shading units and texture units, but no ROPS at all, which explains its pixel rate of 0 MPixel/s. The AMD card’s pixel rate is 195.2 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 390.4 GTexel/s, while the Intel card’s texture rate is 694.4 GTexel/s.

FP32 throughput is close between the two. The AMD card delivers 24.99 TFLOPS, while the Intel card delivers 22.22 TFLOPS, both with FP16 at a 1:1 ratio. Despite having more than three times the shading units, the Intel card’s lower clocks bring its FP32 output below the AMD part.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP wins in any scenario where recorded benchmark data matters, simply because it has measured scores and the Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 does not. The AMD card’s 89th percentile ranking places it among the faster GPUs in the database, and its average score of 63830 is competitive with the nearest rivals listed. For workloads that resemble Geekbench OpenCL, the RX 9060 XT LP’s 88183 score shows strong compute ability. For Vulkan-based tasks, its 39476 score is lower, but still a functional data point.

The Intel card wins in memory capacity and bandwidth. With 48 GB of HBM2e memory and 1.23 TB/s of bandwidth, it offers far more headroom for large datasets that exceed the AMD card’s 16 GB capacity. The Intel part also has more shading units and texture units, which could benefit compute-heavy tasks that scale with raw unit count rather than clock speed. Its 56 ray tracing cores exceed the AMD card’s 32, though without benchmark data the practical impact is unverified.

In terms of power and physical design, the AMD card has a lower TDP at 140 W compared to the Intel card’s 300 W. The AMD card uses a single 8-pin power connector and suggests a 300 W power supply, while the Intel card uses a single 12-pin connector and suggests a 700 W power supply. The Intel card is also longer at 267 mm (10.5 inches), while the AMD card’s length is not listed. Both are dual-slot designs.

The AMD card provides display outputs, including 1x HDMI 2.1b and 2x DisplayPort 2.1a, while the Intel card has no display outputs. That makes the AMD part suitable for direct display connection, while the Intel part is clearly designed for headless compute or server deployments.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every specification field. The AMD card uses a 4 nm process at TSMC, the Intel card uses a 10 nm process at Intel. Transistor counts are 29,700 million versus 100,000 million. Die size is 199 mm² versus 1280 mm². Transistor density is 149.2M per mm² versus 78.1M per mm².

Base clocks are 1380 MHz versus 1000 MHz. Boost clocks are 3050 MHz versus 1550 MHz. The AMD card has a game clock of 2450 MHz, the Intel card has none. Memory clocks are 2518 MHz (20.1 Gbps effective) for the AMD card versus 600 MHz (1200 Mbps effective) for the Intel card.

Memory size is 16 GB versus 48 GB. Memory type is GDDR6 versus HBM2e. Bus width is 128 bit versus 8192 bit. Bandwidth is 322.3 GB/s versus 1.23 TB/s.

Shading units are 2048 versus 7168. TMUs are 128 versus 448. ROPs are 64 versus 0. Ray tracing cores are 32 versus 56. Pixel rate is 195.2 GPixel/s versus 0 MPixel/s. Texture rate is 390.4 GTexel/s versus 694.4 GTexel/s. FP32 is 24.99 TFLOPS versus 22.22 TFLOPS. FP16 matches FP32 on both.

TDP is 140 W versus 300 W. Power connectors are 1x 8-pin versus 1x 12-pin. Suggested PSU is 300 W versus 700 W. Both use PCIe 5.0 x16. Display outputs: the AMD card has 1x HDMI 2.1b and 2x DisplayPort 2.1a, the Intel card has none.

API support differs as well. The AMD card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Intel card supports DirectX 12 (12_1) and OpenGL 4.6, with no Vulkan listing. The Intel card’s length is 267 mm (10.5 inches), while the AMD card’s dimensions are not listed. Release dates also differ: the AMD card was released on 2025-12-16, the Intel card on 2023-01-09.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP has an average benchmark score of 63830. The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 has an average benchmark score of 0, meaning no recorded benchmark data exists for it.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The database lists four nearest rivals. The NVIDIA CMP 30HX has an average score of 63842, a delta of 0 percent. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M scores 63775, a delta of 0.1 percent ahead. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 scores 63693, a delta of 0.2 percent behind. The AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 scores 64212, a delta of 0.6 percent ahead.

Q: What is the memory capacity difference?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus. The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 has 48 GB of HBM2e memory on an 8192-bit bus.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 has 7168 shading units, while the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP has 2048 shading units.

Q: Does the Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 support display outputs?

A: No. The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 has no display outputs. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP has 1x HDMI 2.1b and 2x DisplayPort 2.1a.

Q: What is the FP32 performance difference?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP delivers 24.99 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 delivers 22.22 TFLOPS. Both have FP16 at a 1:1 ratio with FP32.