GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon RX 9060

CORE STATE Navi 44
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2990 MHz
TDP 132 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 4.0
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025
VS
Intel
GPU

Arc A370M

CORE STATE DG2-128
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2050 MHz
TDP 35 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
3,322
N/A
geekbench_opencl
88,725
29,676
geekbench_vulkan
39,586
28,673

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 9060 vs Intel Arc A370M

If gaming capability is extremely similarly comparable, the evaluation between Intel's Arc A370M graphics and AMD's RX 9060 gets increasingly nuanced. Each GPUs alternate blows in various titles. This total assessment is one of impressive equality. No stands as a clear champion. The choice hinges on particular needs.

In-game benchmarks similarly reveal close results between Intel's Arc A370M graphics and AMD's RX 9060. Performance differences generally remain below single digits. This slight deltas are rarely detectable during real gameplay. Either cards provide responsive performance. Gaming enthusiasts can select comfortably between them.

If performance is this similar, MSRP and capabilities grow the key variables. Examine RT performance capability, AI upscaling technology, TDP, and driver maturity when deciding between Intel's Arc A370M graphics and AMD's RX 9060. These elements can tip the balance. Weigh broadly. This broader context counts.

When those undecided between Intel's Arc A370M graphics and AMD's RX 9060, rest comfortable that both choice achieves matching rendering results. The performance numbers validates nil clear leader. Form your choice on additional elements and enjoy excellent graphics capability either way. Either are excellent in their given sense. Go with confidently.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RX 9060
A370M
Core Specs
Shading Units
1,792
1,024 -42.9%
Shaders
1,792
1,024 -42.9%
TMUs
112
64 -42.9%
ROPs
64
32 -50.0%
Compute Units
28
Execution Units
128
Clocks
Base Clock
1700 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
2990 MHz
2050 MHz
Game Clock
2400 MHz
Memory Clock
2518 MHz 20.1 Gbps effective
1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
8 GB
4 GB
VRAM (MB)
8,192
4,096 -50.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
128 bit
64 bit
Bandwidth
322.3 GB/s
112.0 GB/s
Cache
L2 Cache
4 MB
4 MB
L3 Cache
32 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
191.4 GPixel/s
65.60 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
334.9 GTexel/s
131.2 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
21.43 TFLOPS
4.198 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
669.8 GFLOPS (1:32)
1,049.6 GFLOPS (1:4)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
42.86 TFLOPS (2:1)
8.397 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
28
8 -71.4%
XMX Cores
128
Matrix Cores
56
Power
TDP
132 W
35 W
TDP (W)
132
35 -73.5%
Suggested PSU
300 W
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 4.0
Xe-HPG
GPU Name
Navi 44
DG2-128
Codename
Strix Point
Generation
Navi IV (RX 9000)
Alchemist (Arc 3 Mobile)
Process Size
4 nm
6 nm
Transistors
29,700 million
7,200 million
Die Size
199 mm²
157 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
149.2M / mm²
45.9M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.2
3.0
Shader Model
6.8
6.6
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
IGP
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1b2x DisplayPort 2.1a
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
PCIe 4.0 x8
Other
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
Navi III
View Radeon RX 9060 Details View Arc A370M Details