AMD Radeon RX 7800M vs Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual Comparison

# AMD Radeon RX 7800M vs Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual

The AMD Radeon RX 7800M and Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual occupy entirely different positions in the GPU market, despite sharing the same 5 nm TSMC process node and GDDR6 memory type. The RX 7800M is a mobile-focused part with a 73rd percentile ranking among all GPUs, while the Arc Pro B60 Dual sits at the 50th percentile with no recorded benchmark scores in the database. The RX 7800M delivers substantially higher raw compute throughput, but the Arc Pro B60 Dual counters with double the memory capacity, a newer PCIe interface, and professional display outputs. The choice between them depends on whether the workload prioritizes raw shader performance or memory capacity and workstation connectivity.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 7800M wins every category where benchmark data exists. Its average benchmark score of 27,883 places it in the 73rd percentile of all GPUs, while the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has no recorded benchmarks and sits at the 50th percentile by default. The RX 7800M delivers 35.87 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, nearly three times the Arc Pro B60 Dual's 12.29 TFLOPS. In FP16 workloads, the RX 7800M maintains the same 35.87 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, whereas the Arc Pro B60 Dual reaches 24.58 TFLOPS through a 2:1 ratio, meaning the AMD part still leads by roughly 46% even in the Intel card's preferred precision format.

The RX 7800M also leads in pixel throughput at 224.2 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s, and in texture throughput at 560.4 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s. The AMD card packs 3,840 shading units, 240 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, compared to the Intel card's 2,560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 80 ROPs. The RX 7800M further dominates in ray tracing hardware with 60 RT cores versus 20 on the Arc Pro B60 Dual.

The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual wins in areas outside raw compute. It offers 24 GB of GDDR6 memory, exactly double the RX 7800M's 12 GB. Memory bandwidth favors Intel slightly at 456.0 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s, achieved through a higher effective memory clock of 19 Gbps versus 18 Gbps, both on a 192-bit bus. The Arc Pro B60 Dual also uses a PCIe 5.0 x8 interface, while the RX 7800M uses PCIe 4.0 x16, giving Intel twice the per-lane bandwidth of the previous generation. For display connectivity, the Intel card provides four mini-DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, whereas the AMD card's outputs are described as portable device dependent, meaning they vary by laptop implementation.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural generations and design philosophies. AMD uses the Navi 32 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Wheat Nas, belonging to the Navi Mobile (RX 7000M) generation. Intel counters with the BMG-G21 chip based on Xe2-HPG architecture, part of the Battlemage (Pro Series) generation. Both are fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process, but the chip designs diverge significantly in scale.

The Navi 32 die measures 346 mm² and contains 28,100 million transistors, yielding a transistor density of 81.2 million per mm². The BMG-G21 die is smaller at 272 mm² with 19,600 million transistors, resulting in a lower density of 72.1 million per mm². This means AMD packs roughly 43% more transistors into a 27% larger die, reflecting the RX 7800M's emphasis on compute throughput. The Intel chip's smaller transistor count aligns with its lower shading unit count and reduced FP32 output.

Clock behavior also differs. The RX 7800M has a base clock of 1295 MHz and a boost clock of 2335 MHz, with a game clock of 2145 MHz. The Arc Pro B60 Dual runs higher base and boost clocks at 2000 MHz and 2400 MHz respectively, but it lacks a defined game clock. Despite the Intel card's higher clocks, the RX 7800M's massive shading unit advantage overwhelms the frequency difference in compute-bound tasks.

Power delivery and physical design reflect their different target markets. The RX 7800M carries a 180 W TDP with no power connectors, classified as an IGP (integrated graphics processor) for mobile use. The Arc Pro B60 Dual demands 400 W, uses a single 16-pin connector, requires an 800 W suggested PSU, and occupies a dual-slot form factor measuring 300 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. This makes the Intel card a desktop workstation component, while the AMD card is designed for laptop integration.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons are unavailable in the database, as the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has no recorded benchmark scores. However, the RX 7800M's individual benchmark results provide a clear picture of its capabilities. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the RX 7800M scores 2,994. Geekbench results show 120,778 in OpenCL and 126,668 in Vulkan. Passmark tests reveal 17,613 in G3D, 9,342 in GPU compute, 892 in G2D, and lower scores in legacy DirectX tests: 99 in DirectX 10, 176 in DirectX 11, 89 in DirectX 12, and 174 in DirectX 9.

The nearest rivals to the RX 7800M, based on average benchmark score, provide context for its positioning. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 scores 27,839, a 0.2% difference from the RX 7800M's 27,883. The AMD Radeon Pro W5500X scores 27,973, putting the RX 7800M 0.3% behind. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti scores 28,020, making the RX 7800M 0.5% slower. The AMD FirePro S7150 scores 28,117, leaving the RX 7800M 0.8% behind. These near-identical scores place the RX 7800M in a tight performance cluster where small percentage differences separate the cards.

The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual's lack of benchmark data means no such comparisons can be drawn. Its 50th percentile ranking is not derived from measured performance but reflects the absence of recorded results. The database shows zero wins for either card in head-to-head testing, and the wins counters for both are zero.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher raw compute performance?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7800M delivers 35.87 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, compared to the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual's 12.29 TFLOPS. In FP16, the RX 7800M maintains 35.87 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, while the Arc Pro B60 Dual reaches 24.58 TFLOPS via a 2:1 ratio.

Q: Which GPU has more memory?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory, exactly double the AMD Radeon RX 7800M's 12 GB. Both use a 192-bit memory bus, but Intel's higher 19 Gbps effective memory clock gives it 456.0 GB/s bandwidth versus 432.0 GB/s for AMD.

Q: What are the physical differences between the two cards?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7800M is an IGP with a 180 W TDP and no power connectors, designed for mobile integration. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual is a dual-slot desktop card with a 400 W TDP, a single 16-pin power connector, an 800 W suggested PSU, and dimensions of 300 mm by 110 mm by 40 mm.

Q: How do their ray tracing capabilities compare?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7800M has 60 ray tracing cores, three times the 20 RT cores found on the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual.

Q: What display outputs does each card offer?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual provides four mini-DisplayPort 2.1 outputs. The AMD Radeon RX 7800M's display outputs are portable device dependent, meaning they vary based on the laptop design.

Q: What are the release dates for these GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7800M was released on September 10, 2024. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual was released on September 4, 2025, nearly a year later.

The Verdict

The data indicates a clear performance hierarchy favoring the AMD Radeon RX 7800M for compute-intensive workloads. The RX 7800M's 35.87 TFLOPS FP32 output, 3,840 shading units, 60 RT cores, and 73rd percentile ranking place it well ahead of the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual in raw rendering power. The Intel card's 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 and 20 RT cores cannot compete in this domain, and its 50th percentile ranking with zero recorded benchmarks reinforces its unproven performance status.

However, the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual serves a different purpose. Its 24 GB memory capacity, 456.0 GB/s bandwidth, PCIe 5.0 x8 interface, and four mini-DisplayPort 2.1 outputs make it suitable for workstation scenarios requiring large datasets and professional display configurations. The card's 400 W TDP and dual-slot design indicate a desktop workstation role, while the RX 7800M's 180 W TDP and IGP classification target high-end gaming laptops.

The RX 7800M's nearest rivals, all within 0.8% of its average score, show it competes at the level of previous-generation workstation and enthusiast cards like the Radeon Pro Vega 20, Radeon Pro W5500X, GeForce GTX 980 Ti, and FirePro S7150. This places the AMD card in a proven performance bracket, whereas the Intel card's lack of benchmark data leaves its actual capability unverified.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 7800M | Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual |

|----------------|---------------------|------------------------|

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Xe2-HPG |

| Chip | Navi 32 | BMG-G21 |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |

| Transistors | 28,100 million | 19,600 million |

| Die Size | 346 mm² | 272 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 81.2M / mm² | 72.1M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 1295 MHz | 2000 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2335 MHz | 2400 MHz |

| Game Clock | 2145 MHz | None |

| Memory Clock | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 2375 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |

| Memory Size | 12 GB | 24 GB |

| Memory Bus Width | 192 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 432.0 GB/s | 456.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 3840 | 2560 |

| TMUs | 240 | 160 |

| ROPs | 96 | 80 |

| RT Cores | 60 | 20 |

| Pixel Rate | 224.2 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 560.4 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 35.87 TFLOPS | 12.29 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 35.87 TFLOPS (1:1) | 24.58 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 180 W | 400 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | None | 800 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x8 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1 |

| Release Date | 2024-09-10 | 2025-09-04 |

| Launch MSRP | None | 1,199 USD |

| Percentile | 73 | 50 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 27,883 | 0 |