AMD Radeon RX 7700S vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile Comparison

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Radeon RX 7700S compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile in overall average benchmark score?

A: The RX 7700S has an average benchmark score of 33,849, while the RTX 5070 Mobile scores 29,928. The AMD part sits 13.1% higher in this aggregate metric, placing it in the 78th percentile of all GPUs, versus the 75th percentile for the NVIDIA part.

Q: Which GPU wins in the Geekbench OpenCL test, and by how much?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile wins decisively. It scores 122,238 compared to the RX 7700S’s 62,983. This represents a 48.5% advantage for the NVIDIA part in this compute workload.

Q: What about the Geekbench Vulkan test?

A: The RTX 5070 Mobile also wins here, scoring 116,960 versus 36,380 for the RX 7700S. The delta is even larger, with the NVIDIA GPU leading by 68.9%.

Q: Are there any benchmark tests where the RX 7700S beats the RTX 5070 Mobile?

A: In the recorded head-to-head data, there are no wins for the RX 7700S. Across the two tests listed (Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan), the RTX 5070 Mobile wins both. The database shows 0 wins for the AMD part and 2 wins for the NVIDIA part.

Q: How do their nearest rivals compare in the database?

A: The RX 7700S is closely matched with older cards like the AMD Radeon HD 7950 (0.3% lower average score), AMD Radeon RX 480 (0.4% lower), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB (0.5% higher), and NVIDIA RTX A5000 (0.7% higher). The RTX 5070 Mobile sits near the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti (0.1% lower), RTX 2080 Ti (0.5% higher), AMD Radeon RX 6800 (0.6% lower), and RX 6700 (1.7% lower).

Q: What are the memory specifications for each GPU?

A: Both have 8 GB of memory on a 128-bit bus. The RX 7700S uses GDDR6 with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the RTX 5070 Mobile uses GDDR7 with 384.0 GB/s bandwidth. The NVIDIA part has 33.3% more memory bandwidth.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon RX 7700S and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile represent fundamentally different design philosophies. The RX 7700S is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 33 chip, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish. It is manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC, packing 13,300 million transistors into a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter. The RTX 5070 Mobile, in contrast, uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with the GB206 chip, produced on a 5 nm process also at TSMC. It contains 21,900 million transistors on a smaller 181 mm² die, achieving a much higher density of 121.0 million per square millimeter.

One of the most striking differences is in the core configuration. The RX 7700S has 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation pipelines. The RTX 5070 Mobile has more than double the shading units at 4,608, along with 144 TMUs and 48 ROPs. For ray tracing, the AMD card has 32 RT cores, while the NVIDIA card has 36 RT cores. The NVIDIA GPU also includes 144 tensor cores, which the AMD part lacks entirely, reflecting the different approaches to AI acceleration.

Clock speeds and power targets tell a compelling story. The RX 7700S runs at a base clock of 1500 MHz and boosts to 2500 MHz, with a game clock of 2200 MHz. The RTX 5070 Mobile has a much lower base clock of 907 MHz and a boost of 1425 MHz. Despite this, the NVIDIA card is rated for just 50 W TDP, half of the RX 7700S’s 100 W rating. The AMD card compensates with higher clocks and a larger power envelope, while the NVIDIA card relies on architectural efficiency and more cores.

The memory subsystems differ not only in bandwidth but also in technology. The RX 7700S uses GDDR6 at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective), while the RTX 5070 Mobile uses newer GDDR7 at 1500 MHz (24 Gbps effective). The NVIDIA part’s 384.0 GB/s bandwidth is a clear advantage over the AMD part’s 288.0 GB/s. The RX 7700S supports PCIe 4.0 x16, while the RTX 5070 Mobile uses PCIe 5.0 x16, doubling the available interconnect bandwidth for external communication.

Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so feature-level API support is identical. Both are classified as IGP (integrated graphics processor) in slot width, with no power connectors and portable-device-dependent display outputs. The release dates are far apart, with the RX 7700S launching on January 3, 2023, and the RTX 5070 Mobile on April 14, 2025.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear split between compute-heavy workloads and traditional rasterization performance. If the priority is raw compute throughput in OpenCL or Vulkan APIs, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile is the unambiguous choice. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 122,238 is nearly double the RX 7700S’s 62,983, and its Vulkan score of 116,960 more than triples the AMD card’s 36,380. These are massive margins that point to a fundamental advantage in parallel compute execution, likely stemming from the larger shading unit count and the presence of tensor cores.

However, the aggregate benchmark picture favors the RX 7700S. Its average benchmark score of 33,849 exceeds the RTX 5070 Mobile’s 29,928 by 13.1%. The RX 7700S also ranks in the 78th percentile of all GPUs, three points higher than the NVIDIA card’s 75th percentile. This suggests that in a broader mix of tests, including DirectX and older workloads, the AMD part holds its own or outperforms. The RX 7700S also has a higher pixel rate (160.0 GPixel/s versus 68.40 GPixel/s) and texture rate (320.0 GTexel/s versus 205.2 GTexel/s), indicating stronger fill-rate capabilities for traditional rendering.

For a user focused on modern AI-assisted features, ray tracing, and compute-heavy applications, the RTX 5070 Mobile is the better pick. For a user prioritizing conventional gaming frame rates at lower power draw per performance in certain legacy workloads, the RX 7700S has merit. The RTX 5070 Mobile’s 50 W TDP is also notably lower, which could matter in thin-and-light laptops where thermal headroom is scarce. The RX 7700S, at 100 W, demands more cooling and battery capacity.

The choice ultimately depends on the workload mix. The database shows the RTX 5070 Mobile dominating in two specific compute benchmarks, while the RX 7700S leads in the overall average. There is no universal winner; the correct pick aligns with the intended use case.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 7700S | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 5 nm |

| Transistors | 13,300 million | 21,900 million |

| Die Size | 204 mm² | 181 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 65.2M / mm² | 121.0M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 1500 MHz | 907 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2500 MHz | 1425 MHz |

| Game Clock | 2200 MHz | Not specified |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |

| Memory Clock | 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) | 1500 MHz (24 Gbps effective) |

| Memory Bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 384.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 2048 | 4608 |

| TMUs | 128 | 144 |

| ROPs | 64 | 48 |

| RT Cores | 32 | 36 |

| Tensor Cores | None | 144 |

| Pixel Rate | 160.0 GPixel/s | 68.40 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 320.0 GTexel/s | 205.2 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 20.48 TFLOPS | 13.13 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 40.96 TFLOPS (2:1) | 13.13 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 100 W | 50 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |

| Release Date | 2023-01-03 | 2025-04-14 |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head results are lopsided in favor of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile, but the magnitude of the wins varies significantly by workload. In the Geekbench OpenCL test, the RTX 5070 Mobile scores 122,238 against the RX 7700S’s 62,983. That is a 48.5% gap, meaning the NVIDIA GPU delivers nearly double the performance in OpenCL compute. This test typically exercises general-purpose GPU compute, including memory bandwidth and parallel arithmetic. The RTX 5070 Mobile’s higher memory bandwidth (384.0 GB/s versus 288.0 GB/s) and much larger shader count (4,608 versus 2,048) are likely contributors.

The Geekbench Vulkan test shows an even wider divergence. The RTX 5070 Mobile posts 116,960, while the RX 7700S manages only 36,380. The delta here is 68.9%, meaning the NVIDIA card is over three times faster in this API. Vulkan is a low-level graphics API that scales well with raw core count and efficient scheduling. The RTX 5070 Mobile’s 144 tensor cores may also play a role in accelerating certain Vulkan compute paths, though the database does not specify this directly.

The RX 7700S has no wins in the recorded head-to-head tests. However, its average benchmark score of 33,849 is higher than the RTX 5070 Mobile’s 29,928, which implies that in other tests not listed in the head-to-head section, the AMD card performs better. The RX 7700S’s FP32 throughput of 20.48 TFLOPS is 56% higher than the RTX 5070 Mobile’s 13.13 TFLOPS, which could translate to advantages in certain floating-point-heavy scenarios. Its pixel rate is also more than double (160.0 GPixel/s versus 68.40 GPixel/s), which helps in fill-rate-limited rasterization.

The nearest rival data adds context. The RX 7700S’s average score sits within 0.7% of the NVIDIA RTX A5000 and within 0.5% of the GTX 1060 5 GB, indicating it is a well-rounded performer in its percentile band. The RTX 5070 Mobile, despite scoring lower on average, is within 0.6% of the AMD Radeon RX 6800 and 0.5% of the RTX 2080 Ti. These comparisons show that both GPUs punch at a similar weight class in aggregate, even though their compute benchmark results diverge sharply.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile wins decisively in compute-bound scenarios. Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan results show advantages of 48.5% and 68.9%, respectively. This makes it the stronger choice for applications that rely on GPGPU compute, such as rendering, scientific simulations, or any workload that can leverage Vulkan’s low-level access or OpenCL’s broad compatibility. The presence of 144 tensor cores also positions it for AI inference and machine learning tasks, which are increasingly common in creative and productivity software. Its 384.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and PCIe 5.0 interface further support data-intensive workflows.

The RX 7700S, while losing the compute benchmarks, has strengths in traditional graphics throughput. Its FP32 rating of 20.48 TFLOPS is substantially higher than the RTX 5070 Mobile’s 13.13 TFLOPS, and its pixel rate of 160.0 GPixel/s is more than double. This suggests it excels in scenarios that are fill-rate limited, such as high-resolution texture rendering or certain anti-aliasing techniques. The higher texture rate of 320.0 GTexel/s also aids in scenes with heavy texture sampling. The AMD card’s higher average benchmark score and higher percentile ranking indicate that in a broader mix of tests, it holds up well.

Power efficiency is another differentiator. The RTX 5070 Mobile consumes 50 W, half of the RX 7700S’s 100 W. For laptops where battery life and thermal management are critical, the NVIDIA part offers more performance per watt in compute tasks. However, the RX 7700S’s higher clocks and fill rates may deliver better raw frame rates in less compute-heavy games, assuming the system can handle the thermal load.

In summary, the RTX 5070 Mobile is the pick for compute-heavy, AI-accelerated, or bandwidth-sensitive workloads. The RX 7700S is the pick for traditional rasterization, fill-rate-heavy rendering, and users who want a higher aggregate benchmark standing. The choice hinges on whether the workload leans compute or graphics.