GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon RX 7700

CORE STATE Navi 32
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2600 MHz
TDP 200 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025
VS
Intel
GPU

Arc A350M

CORE STATE DG2-128
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2200 MHz
TDP 25 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
2,865
N/A
geekbench_opencl
106,028
24,546
geekbench_vulkan
N/A
24,747

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 7700 vs Intel Arc A350M

Arc A350M from Intel and the RX 7700 card from AMD offer almost matching gaming performance in our head-to-head evaluation. Any benchmark differences between both GPUs typically fall below testing variance, positioning both a solid selection. This balance positions the selection interesting. Alternative variables grow particularly significant. Value frequently affects the scales.

Game performance tests additionally show similar performance between Arc A350M from Intel and the RX 7700 card from AMD. Smoothness differences often fall inside testing variance. This small variations are hardly visible during real gaming. Either cards offer fluid gaming. Gaming enthusiasts could decide comfortably between them.

When benchmark scores is so comparable, value and functionality get the main considerations. Evaluate hardware RT capability, upscaling implementation, power consumption, and platform quality when selecting between Arc A350M from Intel and the RX 7700 card from AMD. All these elements might sway the choice. Think holistically. The bigger view is important.

Finally, builders might decide based on specific requirements as opposed to benchmark frame rates exclusively. Either Arc A350M from Intel and the RX 7700 card from AMD offer capable visual performance for their intended segments. This selection depends on individual needs. Each pick is reasonable. Users couldn't go amiss with these options.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RX 7700
A350M
Core Specs
Shading Units
2,560
768 -70.0%
Shaders
2,560
768 -70.0%
TMUs
160
48 -70.0%
ROPs
96
24 -75.0%
Compute Units
40
Execution Units
96
Clocks
Base Clock
1900 MHz
1150 MHz
Boost Clock
2600 MHz
2200 MHz
Game Clock
2400 MHz
Memory Clock
2430 MHz 19.4 Gbps effective
1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
16 GB
4 GB
VRAM (MB)
16,384
4,096 -75.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
256 bit
64 bit
Bandwidth
622.1 GB/s
112.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
L2 Cache
2 MB
4 MB
L3 Cache
64 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
249.6 GPixel/s
52.80 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
416.0 GTexel/s
105.6 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
26.62 TFLOPS
3.379 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
832.0 GFLOPS (1:32)
844.8 GFLOPS (1:4)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
53.25 TFLOPS (2:1)
6.758 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
40
6 -85.0%
XMX Cores
96
Matrix Cores
80
Power
TDP
200 W
25 W
TDP (W)
200
25 -87.5%
Suggested PSU
550 W
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Xe-HPG
GPU Name
Navi 32
DG2-128
Codename
Wheat Nas
Generation
Navi III (RX 7000)
Alchemist (Arc 3 Mobile)
Process Size
5 nm
6 nm
Transistors
28,100 million
7,200 million
Die Size
346 mm²
157 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
81.2M / mm²
45.9M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.2
3.0
Shader Model
6.8
6.6
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
IGP
Length
267 mm 10.5 inches
Height
135 mm 5.3 inches
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a2x DisplayPort 2.11x USB Type-C
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 4.0 x8
Other
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
Navi II
Successor
Navi IV
View Radeon RX 7700 Details View Arc A350M Details