AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE shows two benchmark results, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. This makes a direct head-to-head comparison impossible based on the same test suite. However, the database does provide aggregate scores and percentile placements for both parts.

The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE achieves an average benchmark score of 42,723. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, scores 43,223, which places the AMD part 1.2% behind that GPU. The AMD card sits 1.2% behind the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB (43,262) and 1.3% behind both the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile (43,268) and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 (43,301). These delta values are small, indicating the RX 7650 GRE clusters tightly with those four competitors in overall average performance.

The RX 7650 GRE also has an 83rd percentile ranking among all GPUs in the database. That percentile places it well above the midpoint of the field. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO, by contrast, holds a 50th percentile ranking with an average benchmark score of zero, since no benchmark entries exist for it. The LX PRO's percentile reflects its position at the median of the database distribution, but the zero average score means the database has no measured performance data for it.

The RX 7650 GRE's individual benchmark results include a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,336 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 83,109. The LX PRO has no comparable entries. The absence of any head-to-head benchmark entries in the database for these two cards means the only quantitative comparison available comes from the aggregate fields: the RX 7650 GRE's 42,723 average versus the LX PRO's 0 average, and the 83rd versus 50th percentile placements.

The data indicates the RX 7650 GRE has a measured performance profile, while the LX PRO does not. The LX PRO's 50th percentile with a zero average score is unusual; it suggests the percentile may be derived from specifications or an incomplete data entry rather than from actual benchmark runs. The RX 7650 GRE's position among its nearest rivals, all within 1.3% of its average score, shows it competes directly with mid-range to upper-mid-range NVIDIA cards from the previous generation.

The Verdict

From the recorded data alone, the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE is the only one of the two with any measured benchmark performance. Its 83rd percentile ranking and average score of 42,723 indicate it performs in the upper tier of the database. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no benchmark scores, no average score, and sits at the 50th percentile, which means the database cannot confirm any level of actual performance for it.

A user strictly following the data would select the RX 7650 GRE for any task that requires verified performance, as it has concrete results in both 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 and Geekbench OpenCL. The LX PRO, despite having a higher specification sheet (more memory, more shading units, higher FP32 rating), has no recorded evidence of delivering those specifications in practice. The data cannot support a recommendation for the LX PRO in any performance-based scenario.

The percentile difference is stark: 83rd versus 50th. Even if the LX PRO's zero score is a data artifact, the absence of any measured result prevents a fair comparison. The RX 7650 GRE's closeness to the RTX 4070 SUPER (within 1.2%) and other NVIDIA cards provides a reference point for its capability. The LX PRO lacks any such reference.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score in the database?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE has an average benchmark score of 42,723. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has an average benchmark score of 0, as no benchmark results are recorded for it.

Q: How does the RX 7650 GRE compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RX 7650 GRE is 1.2% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB, and 1.3% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000.

Q: What is the percentile ranking of each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE ranks in the 83rd percentile among all GPUs. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO ranks in the 50th percentile.

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX PRO have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database lists no benchmark entries for the LX PRO, and its average benchmark score is 0.

Q: What specific benchmark results exist for the RX 7650 GRE?

A: The RX 7650 GRE has a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,336 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 83,109.

Q: How much memory does each card have?

A: The RX 7650 GRE has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ in several recorded specifications. The RX 7650 GRE uses a 128-bit memory bus with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, delivering a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. The LX PRO uses a 192-bit bus with 24 GB of GDDR6 memory, delivering a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. The memory clock is the same for both: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective.

The RX 7650 GRE has 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. The LX PRO has 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The RX 7650 GRE has 32 ray tracing cores; the LX PRO has no recorded ray tracing core count. Neither card has tensor cores listed.

Pixel and texture rates differ: the RX 7650 GRE produces 172.5 GPixel/s and 345.0 GTexel/s, while the LX PRO produces 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s. FP32 throughput is 22.08 TFLOPS for the RX 7650 GRE and 24.58 TFLOPS for the LX PRO. FP16 throughput is 22.08 TFLOPS for the RX 7650 GRE (1:1 ratio) and 49.15 TFLOPS for the LX PRO (2:1 ratio).

Power requirements differ: the RX 7650 GRE has a TDP of 170 W and uses a single 8-pin power connector, while the LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W and uses a single 16-pin connector. The suggested PSU is 450 W for the RX 7650 GRE and 550 W for the LX PRO. The RX 7650 GRE uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface; the LX PRO uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

Display outputs vary: the RX 7650 GRE has 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, while the LX PRO has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. The RX 7650 GRE measures 204 mm in length and 115 mm in height, while the LX PRO measures 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width.

Architecture Differences

The RX 7650 GRE is built on the Navi 33 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish, and belongs to the Navi III (RX 7000) generation. The LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip with TrueGPU architecture and belongs to the 7G100 generation. Both are fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, but the RX 7650 GRE has a recorded transistor count of 13,300 million on a 204 mm² die, while the LX PRO has unknown transistor and die size figures.

The RX 7650 GRE has a base clock of 1720 MHz, a boost clock of 2695 MHz, and a game clock of 2350 MHz. The LX PRO has no recorded base, boost, or game clocks. The RX 7650 GRE supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6.

The RX 7650 GRE has 32 ray tracing cores; the LX PRO lists no ray tracing cores. The RX 7650 GRE's FP16 performance is a 1:1 ratio with FP32, while the LX PRO's FP16 is a 2:1 ratio, meaning it can process half-precision tasks at twice the rate of single-precision. The LX PRO lacks a recorded predecessor and successor, while the RX 7650 GRE lists Navi II as its predecessor and Navi IV as its successor.

Where Each One Wins

From the data, the RX 7650 GRE wins in any measured performance category because it is the only card with benchmark results. Its 83rd percentile ranking and average score of 42,723 confirm that it sits above the vast majority of GPUs in the database. The RX 7650 GRE also wins in ray tracing support, with 32 ray tracing cores versus none listed for the LX PRO, and in API version support, with Vulkan 1.4 versus 1.3.

The LX PRO wins in specification-based categories. It has 24 GB of memory versus 8 GB, a 192-bit bus versus 128-bit, and bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s versus 288.0 GB/s. It also has more shading units (6,144 versus 2,048), more TMUs (192 versus 128), more ROPs (96 versus 64), and higher theoretical throughput in pixel rate, texture rate, FP32, and FP16. The LX PRO has a wider PCIe interface (x16 versus x8) and a higher TDP, which suggests it is designed for higher sustained loads, though the database provides no evidence of actual performance.

The RX 7650 GRE wins in compactness: it is shorter (204 mm versus 248 mm) and has a lower TDP (170 W versus 225 W), along with a lower suggested PSU (450 W versus 550 W). The RX 7650 GRE also has a known release date of 2025-02-06 and a launch MSRP of 279 USD. The LX PRO has a release date of 2026-03-16 and no launch MSRP recorded.

The data splits cleanly: the RX 7650 GRE wins on verified performance, ray tracing, API support, and power efficiency. The LX PRO wins on paper specifications for memory capacity, memory bandwidth, compute units, and theoretical throughput. Without benchmark data for the LX PRO, the database cannot confirm whether its higher specifications translate into real-world advantages. The RX 7650 GRE remains the only card whose performance is backed by recorded measurements.