GPU Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data includes one direct head-to-head benchmark between the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE and the NVIDIA T1000: Geekbench OpenCL. In this test, the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE scores 83,109, while the NVIDIA T1000 scores 37,704. This results in a delta of 120.4% in favor of the AMD card, meaning the Radeon RX 7650 GRE delivers more than double the OpenCL compute performance of the T1000 in this workload. The margin is substantial, and it is the only shared benchmark in the database, so the comparison relies heavily on this single metric plus the aggregate scores and rival positioning.

Looking at the broader database averages, the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE holds an average benchmark score of 42,723, which places it in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs tracked. The NVIDIA T1000, by contrast, has an average benchmark score of 36,289, placing it in the 80th percentile. The difference in percentile ranking is modest, only three points, but the raw score gap of 6,434 points (approximately 17.7% higher for the AMD part) reflects a meaningful performance separation in aggregate terms. The AMD card’s nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER at 43,223 (1.2% higher), the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB at 43,262 (1.2% higher), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile at 43,268 (1.3% higher), and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 at 43,301 (1.3% higher). This suggests the Radeon RX 7650 GRE sits just below a cluster of high-end cards, with all deltas within 1.3%, indicating that its aggregate position is tightly contested.

The NVIDIA T1000’s nearest rivals tell a different story. It is 0.7% behind the AMD Radeon RX 5300M (36,529) and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X (36,530), while it leads the AMD Radeon Pro Duo by 1.2% (35,860) and the NVIDIA Quadro GV100 by 2.2% (35,520). These small deltas show that the T1000 is clustered with older or lower-tier parts, and its aggregate score does not approach the level of the Radeon RX 7650 GRE. The OpenCL head-to-head result reinforces this: the 120.4% delta is far larger than any delta seen among either card’s nearest rivals, making it the clearest single-data-point indicator of performance disparity in this matchup.

One nuance worth noting is that the T1000 has a Geekbench Vulkan score of 34,874, while the Radeon RX 7650 GRE has no Vulkan benchmark recorded in the database. The AMD card’s OpenCL score of 83,109 is more than double the T1000’s Vulkan score, but cross-API comparisons are not directly equivalent, so the strongest evidence remains the shared OpenCL test. The wins tally in the database shows the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE with 1 win and the NVIDIA T1000 with 0 wins in head-to-head tests.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE than the NVIDIA T1000 in OpenCL?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE scores 83,109 in Geekbench OpenCL, while the NVIDIA T1000 scores 37,704, giving the AMD card a 120.4% performance advantage in that test.

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE has an average benchmark score of 42,723, compared to the NVIDIA T1000’s 36,289, a difference of 6,434 points in favor of the AMD card.

Q: How do the two cards compare in terms of overall GPU percentile ranking?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE ranks in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs, while the NVIDIA T1000 ranks in the 80th percentile, so the AMD card sits three percentile points higher.

Q: Does the NVIDIA T1000 have any benchmark where it wins?

A: No. The database records 1 head-to-head win for the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE and 0 wins for the NVIDIA T1000. The T1000 does have a Geekbench Vulkan score of 34,874, but the AMD card has no recorded Vulkan score, so no direct comparison exists there.

Q: What are the nearest rivals to each card in aggregate score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE’s closest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER at 43,223 (1.2% higher). The NVIDIA T1000’s closest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 5300M at 36,529 (0.7% higher).

Q: Which card has a higher pixel rate?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE has a pixel rate of 172.5 GPixel/s, while the NVIDIA T1000 has a pixel rate of 44.64 GPixel/s, making the AMD card nearly four times faster in this metric.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, specifically the Navi 33 chip, which carries the codename Hotpink Bonefish and belongs to the Navi III (RX 7000) generation. It is manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with 13,300 million transistors packed into a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². The NVIDIA T1000, in contrast, uses the Turing architecture with the TU117 chip, part of the Quadro Turing (Tx000) generation. It is produced on a 12 nm process, also at TSMC, with 4,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 23.5M per mm². The difference in process node and transistor density is significant: the AMD card packs nearly three times the transistors into a similar die area, which explains much of its compute advantage.

The Radeon RX 7650 GRE features 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units (TMUs), 64 raster operation units (ROPs), and 32 ray tracing cores. The T1000 has 896 shading units, 56 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, with no ray tracing cores listed. The AMD card’s shading unit count is more than double the T1000’s, and its TMU count is also more than double. The absence of ray tracing hardware on the T1000 is a notable architectural gap, as the Radeon RX 7650 GRE can handle ray-traced workloads while the T1000 cannot, at least based on the recorded specifications.

Memory architecture also differs substantially. The Radeon RX 7650 GRE uses 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The T1000 also uses GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, but only 4 GB of capacity and 160.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The AMD card thus offers double the memory capacity and 80% more bandwidth, which has direct implications for texture-heavy workloads and larger datasets. Clock behavior further separates the two: the Radeon RX 7650 GRE has a base clock of 1720 MHz, a boost clock of 2695 MHz, and a game clock of 2350 MHz, while the T1000 has a base clock of 1065 MHz and a boost clock of 1395 MHz, with no game clock listed. The AMD card’s boost clock is nearly double the T1000’s.

The bus interface differs as well. The Radeon RX 7650 GRE uses PCIe 4.0 x8, while the T1000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16. In terms of API support, both cards support DirectX 12, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, but the AMD card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), whereas the T1000 supports only DirectX 12 (12_1). This means the Radeon RX 7650 GRE is aligned with the latest DirectX feature set, including ray tracing and mesh shaders, while the T1000 predates those features. The Radeon RX 7650 GRE also reports a 1:1 FP16 to FP32 ratio at 22.08 TFLOPS for both, while the T1000 reports FP32 at 2.500 TFLOPS and FP16 at 5.000 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, indicating different compute precision strategies.

Specification Differences

The two cards diverge across nearly every measurable specification. The process node differs: 6 nm for the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE versus 12 nm for the NVIDIA T1000. Transistor count is 13,300 million versus 4,700 million. Die size is similar at 204 mm² versus 200 mm², but transistor density is 65.2M per mm² versus 23.5M per mm². Base clock is 1720 MHz versus 1065 MHz, boost clock is 2695 MHz versus 1395 MHz, and the AMD card has a game clock of 2350 MHz while the T1000 has none listed. Memory clock is 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) versus 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective). Memory capacity is 8 GB versus 4 GB, bandwidth is 288.0 GB/s versus 160.0 GB/s, and the bus width is identical at 128 bits.

Compute resources differ sharply: shading units are 2048 versus 896, TMUs are 128 versus 56, ROPs are 64 versus 32, and ray tracing cores are 32 on the AMD card versus none on the T1000. Pixel rate is 172.5 GPixel/s versus 44.64 GPixel/s, texture rate is 345.0 GTexel/s versus 78.12 GTexel/s, and FP32 compute is 22.08 TFLOPS versus 2.500 TFLOPS. FP16 compute is 22.08 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 5.000 TFLOPS (2:1). Power draw is 170 W versus 50 W, slot width is dual-slot versus single-slot, and power connectors are 1x 8-pin versus none. The suggested PSU is 450 W versus 250 W. Bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8 versus PCIe 3.0 x16. Display outputs are 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1 versus 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a. Dimensions differ: the AMD card is 204 mm (8 inches) long and 115 mm (4.5 inches) tall, while the T1000 is 156 mm (6.1 inches) long and 69 mm (2.7 inches) tall. Production status is Active for the AMD card and End-of-life for the T1000. The release dates are 2025-02-06 for the AMD card and 2021-05-05 for the T1000. The AMD card has a launch MSRP of 279 USD; the T1000 has no launch MSRP recorded.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE wins in every category where direct comparison data exists. In the only shared benchmark, Geekbench OpenCL, it is 120.4% ahead. In aggregate average score, it is 17.7% higher. In pixel rate, it is 172.5 GPixel/s versus 44.64 GPixel/s, a near fourfold advantage. In texture rate, it is 345.0 GTexel/s versus 78.12 GTexel/s, more than a fourfold advantage. In FP32 compute, it is 22.08 TFLOPS versus 2.500 TFLOPS, an 8.8x difference. In memory bandwidth, it is 288.0 GB/s versus 160.0 GB/s, and in memory capacity it is 8 GB versus 4 GB. The AMD card also supports ray tracing with 32 dedicated cores, while the T1000 has none.

The NVIDIA T1000 has no recorded wins in the database. However, it does have qualitative advantages in certain areas. Its power draw is 50 W versus 170 W, making it far more power-efficient in absolute terms, and it requires no power connectors while the AMD card requires a single 8-pin connector. Its suggested PSU is 250 W versus 450 W. It is a single-slot card, while the AMD card is dual-slot, and it is physically smaller at 156 mm (6.1 inches) and 69 mm (2.7 inches) versus 204 mm (8 inches) and 115 mm (4.5 inches). It also offers four mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, which may suit multi-display workstation setups, and it uses a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface, which offers more lanes than the AMD card’s PCIe 4.0 x8, though the newer standard on the AMD card provides higher per-lane bandwidth. The T1000’s Vulkan score of 34,874 indicates some Vulkan capability, but the AMD card has no recorded Vulkan score, so no comparison can be made there.

The Verdict

The data points overwhelmingly toward the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE as the stronger performer in this matchup. Its OpenCL score of 83,109 versus 37,704 is a 120.4% advantage, and its aggregate average score of 42,723 versus 36,289 places it in a higher percentile (83rd versus 80th). The compute, memory, and rendering specifications all favor the AMD card by wide margins, often multiples of the T1000’s figures. The AMD card is also newer, released on 2025-02-06 versus 2021-05-05, and remains in active production, while the T1000 is end-of-life.

The NVIDIA T1000 is best suited for scenarios where its low power draw, single-slot form factor, and small physical footprint matter more than raw performance. At 50 W with no power connectors and a 250 W suggested PSU, it can fit into compact or low-power systems where the 170 W, dual-slot Radeon RX 7650 GRE with a 450 W PSU requirement would be impractical. Its four mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs also provide more display connectivity options than the AMD card’s single HDMI 2.1a and three DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, though the AMD card supports the newer DisplayPort 2.1 standard.

For any workload that depends on compute throughput, memory bandwidth, ray tracing, or modern DirectX features, the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE is the clear choice based on the recorded data. The T1000 cannot match its FP32 throughput, its memory capacity, or its texture and pixel rates. The 120.4% OpenCL delta is the single most decisive metric in the database, and no T1000 benchmark counters it. Users prioritizing maximum performance, ray tracing support, and higher memory capacity should select the AMD card. Users prioritizing minimal power consumption, compact dimensions, and multi-display output should consider the T1000, but they must accept a substantial performance deficit.