AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data presents a direct comparison challenge: the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE has two benchmark entries in the database, while the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation has no recorded benchmark scores at all. The head-to-head benchmark table is empty, and each product shows zero wins in direct competition. This absence of a common benchmark suite means the two cannot be ranked by a shared performance test in the database.

What does exist are the standalone results for the AMD card. In 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12), the RX 7650 GRE scores 2336 points. Its Geekbench OpenCL result is 83109. These numbers place the card at the 83rd percentile among all GPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 42723. The nearest rivals for the RX 7650 GRE are all within a narrow band of performance. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER averages 43223, which is 1.2% higher than the AMD card's average. The NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB also averages 43223, also 1.2% higher. The RTX 5050 Mobile sits at 43268, 1.3% higher, and the Quadro M6000 without the 24 GB suffix averages 43301, again 1.3% higher. The AMD card trails all four by roughly one percentage point, a margin so small that the database treats them as effectively equivalent.

The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation, by contrast, holds a 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs and an average benchmark score of zero, with no nearest rivals listed. The data shows no measured performance for this part. Any comparison between the two products must therefore rely on architectural and specification differences rather than direct test results.

The Verdict

The data points to two different products for two different roles. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE is a consumer desktop card with active production status, a launch MSRP of 279 USD, and measured benchmark scores that place it near the top half of the database's GPU population. Its 83rd percentile ranking and the tight cluster of rival scores around it indicate a card that competes at a specific mainstream performance level.

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation is an embedded, integrated graphics processor (IGP) with no recorded benchmarks. Its 50th percentile ranking appears to be a neutral placeholder given the zero average score. This is not a card for which the database has any performance evidence. The data cannot support a claim that one outperforms the other in any workload. What the data does show is that the AMD card has confirmed performance numbers and the NVIDIA part does not.

For a user selecting purely on recorded data, the RX 7650 GRE is the only option with verified results. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation may be intended for a different deployment scenario entirely, given its IGP slot width and portable-device-dependent display outputs, but the database offers no comparative figures to weigh.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural lineages. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Navi III (RX 7000) generation and follows the Navi II predecessor. The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation uses the AD103 chip on Ada Lovelace architecture, with the generation listed as Ada-MW. Its predecessor is Ampere-MW and its successor is Blackwell-MW.

Fabrication details differ considerably. AMD's chip is built on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter. NVIDIA's chip uses a 5 nm TSMC process with 45,900 million transistors across a 379 mm² die, for a density of 121.1 million per square millimeter. The NVIDIA die is larger, denser, and packs over three times the transistor count.

Core configurations diverge sharply. The AMD card has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 render output units, and 32 ray tracing cores. It has no tensor cores listed. The NVIDIA part carries 9728 shading units, 304 TMUs, 112 ROPs, 76 ray tracing cores, and 304 tensor cores. The presence of tensor cores is a defining difference: the NVIDIA chip includes hardware that the AMD card lacks entirely.

Clock behavior also differs. AMD's card has a base clock of 1720 MHz, a boost of 2695 MHz, and a game clock of 2350 MHz. NVIDIA's embedded part runs a base of 930 MHz and a boost of 1680 MHz, with no game clock listed. The AMD card boosts far higher, while the NVIDIA part relies on a much larger shader count to generate its compute throughput.

Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Both use GDDR6 memory. The similarities largely end there.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher FP32 compute throughput?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation lists 32.69 TFLOPS FP32, while the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE lists 22.08 TFLOPS. The NVIDIA part is approximately 48% higher by this metric.

Q: How much memory does each card have?

A: The AMD card has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The NVIDIA card has 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth, exactly double the capacity and bandwidth.

Q: What are the thermal design power figures?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE has a TDP of 170 W and requires a 1x 8-pin power connector with a suggested 450 W power supply. The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation has a TDP of 120 W and lists no power connectors, as it is an integrated graphics processor.

Q: Does either card have tensor cores?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation includes 304 tensor cores. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE lists no tensor cores in the database.

Q: What is the production status of each GPU?

A: Both are listed as Active in production status.

Q: Are there any direct benchmark comparisons between the two?

A: No. The head-to-head benchmark table is empty, and the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation has no recorded benchmark scores, an average score of zero, and no nearest rivals listed.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE wins in the category of verified performance data. It has two recorded benchmark results, an 83rd percentile standing among all GPUs, and a cluster of nearest rivals within 1.3% of its average score. It also carries a higher boost clock at 2695 MHz versus 1680 MHz, a higher base clock at 1720 MHz versus 930 MHz, and a game clock that the NVIDIA part does not list. Its 64 ROPs deliver a pixel rate of 172.5 GPixel/s, and its 128 TMUs deliver a texture rate of 345.0 GTexel/s. These are concrete, measured or specified wins for the AMD product.

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation wins in raw hardware resources. It has 9728 shading units versus 2048, 304 TMUs versus 128, 112 ROPs versus 64, 76 ray tracing cores versus 32, and 304 tensor cores versus none. Its FP32 throughput of 32.69 TFLOPS exceeds the AMD card's 22.08 TFLOPS. Its FP16 output matches its FP32 at 32.69 TFLOPS, while the AMD card also runs FP16 at 22.08 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio. The NVIDIA part doubles the memory capacity to 16 GB, doubles the bus width to 256 bit, and doubles bandwidth to 576.0 GB/s. Its texture rate of 510.7 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 188.2 GPixel/s are both higher than the AMD card's figures.

The power envelope favors the NVIDIA part, with a 120 W TDP against the AMD card's 170 W. The NVIDIA card also uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, while the AMD card uses PCIe 4.0 x8. The AMD card has a defined physical footprint at 204 mm length and 115 mm height, while the NVIDIA part has no listed dimensions, consistent with its embedded IGP form factor.

Specification Differences

The two products differ across nearly every recorded specification. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE uses the Navi 33 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture and the codename Hotpink Bonefish. The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation uses the AD103 chip with Ada Lovelace architecture and no codename. The process nodes differ: 6 nm for AMD, 5 nm for NVIDIA, both at TSMC. Transistor counts stand at 13,300 million for AMD and 45,900 million for NVIDIA. Die sizes are 204 mm² versus 379 mm². Transistor density is 65.2M per mm² for AMD and 121.1M per mm² for NVIDIA.

Clock speeds differ across base and boost. The AMD card runs 1720 MHz base and 2695 MHz boost, with a 2350 MHz game clock. The NVIDIA part runs 930 MHz base and 1680 MHz boost, with no game clock. Memory clocks match at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective, but memory size, bus width, and bandwidth all favor the NVIDIA card: 16 GB versus 8 GB, 256 bit versus 128 bit, and 576.0 GB/s versus 288.0 GB/s.

Core counts are substantially higher on the NVIDIA chip: 9728 shading units versus 2048, 304 TMUs versus 128, 112 ROPs versus 64, 76 ray tracing cores versus 32, and 304 tensor cores versus none listed. Pixel rate, texture rate, FP32, and FP16 all favor NVIDIA. The TDP favors NVIDIA at 120 W versus 170 W. Slot width differs: the AMD card is dual-slot with a 1x 8-pin connector, while the NVIDIA part is an IGP with no power connectors. The suggested PSU is 450 W for AMD and not listed for NVIDIA. Bus interfaces are PCIe 4.0 x8 for AMD and PCIe 4.0 x16 for NVIDIA. Display outputs are 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1 for AMD, versus portable-device-dependent for NVIDIA. The AMD card has a launch MSRP of 279 USD; the NVIDIA part has no launch MSRP recorded. Release dates differ as well, with the AMD card listed at 2025-02-06 and the NVIDIA part at 2023-03-20.