AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE vs NVIDIA N1 16SM Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for these two parts is asymmetrical. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE carries two benchmark entries: a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2336 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 83109. Its average benchmark score across the database is 42723. The NVIDIA N1 16SM, by contrast, has no recorded benchmark entries and an average benchmark score of 0. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, so direct same-test comparisons cannot be drawn from the database.

The absence of scores for the NVIDIA part is itself a data point. The RX 7650 GRE sits at the 83rd percentile among all GPUs, while the N1 16SM sits at the 50th percentile. A percentile gap of 33 points indicates that the AMD part lands in the top fifth of the database distribution, whereas the NVIDIA part lands exactly at the median. The database does not show any test where the N1 16SM posts a winning score.

The RX 7650 GRE's nearest rivals in the database are all NVIDIA parts, and the deltas are narrow. The Quadro M6000 24 GB averages 43262, which is 1.2% above the RX 7650 GRE. The Quadro M6000 averages 43301, also 1.3% above. The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER averages 43223, 1.2% above. The GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile averages 43268, 1.3% above. These margins mean the RX 7650 GRE trades blows with high-end workstation cards and recent desktop and mobile GeForce parts within a spread of roughly one and a half percent. The N1 16SM has no nearest rivals listed, which reflects its empty benchmark record.

The practical reading is that the RX 7650 GRE delivers a measured, competitive score profile, while the N1 16SM offers no measured performance data in this database. Any comparison of raw speed must rely on the AMD part's recorded results and the architectural differences described below.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE has an average benchmark score of 42723. The NVIDIA N1 16SM has an average benchmark score of 0, as no benchmarks are recorded for it.

Q: How does the RX 7650 GRE compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The RX 7650 GRE trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER by 1.2%, the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB by 1.2%, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile by 1.3%, and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 by 1.3%. All four rivals average between 43223 and 43301.

Q: What is the percentile ranking for each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE ranks at the 83rd percentile among all GPUs. The NVIDIA N1 16SM ranks at the 50th percentile.

Q: Does the NVIDIA N1 16SM have any recorded wins in the database?

A: No. The wins field for the head-to-head comparison shows 0 for the NVIDIA part, and it has no benchmark entries and no nearest rivals listed.

Q: What are the launch details for these two parts?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE has a launch MSRP of 279 USD and a release date of 2025-02-06. The NVIDIA N1 16SM has no launch MSRP recorded and a release date of 2026-05-31.

Q: Which part has the higher FP32 throughput?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE delivers 22.08 TFLOPS FP32. The NVIDIA N1 16SM delivers 9.609 TFLOPS FP32, which is less than half of the AMD figure.

The Verdict

The database supports a clear split. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE is a measured, active desktop GPU with a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2336, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 83109, an average score of 42723, and an 83rd percentile placement. The NVIDIA N1 16SM is an active integrated graphics processor with no benchmark scores, no average score, and a 50th percentile placement. Users who need recorded performance data should select the RX 7650 GRE. Users who need a 128 GB unified memory pool and a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface should select the N1 16SM, but they should expect no measured performance evidence in the database.

Specification Differences

The two parts differ across nearly every specification field. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128 bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The NVIDIA N1 16SM uses 128 GB of LPDDR5X on a 256 bit bus with 273.2 GB/s bandwidth. The AMD part has a higher memory bandwidth figure, while the NVIDIA part has 16 times the memory capacity and double the bus width.

Clock speeds differ substantially. The RX 7650 GRE has a base clock of 1720 MHz, a boost clock of 2695 MHz, and a game clock of 2350 MHz. The N1 16SM has a base clock of 741 MHz and a boost clock of 2346 MHz, with no game clock recorded. Memory clocks also differ: 2250 MHz at 18 Gbps effective for the AMD part versus 1067 MHz at 8.5 Gbps effective for the NVIDIA part.

Rasterization and compute rates favor the AMD part. The RX 7650 GRE delivers 172.5 GPixel/s and 345.0 GTexel/s, while the N1 16SM delivers 56.30 GPixel/s and 300.3 GTexel/s. FP32 throughput is 22.08 TFLOPS for the AMD part versus 9.609 TFLOPS for the NVIDIA part. The AMD part has 64 ROPs, while the NVIDIA part has 24 ROPs.

Form factor and power delivery differ completely. The RX 7650 GRE is a dual-slot card with a 170 W TDP, a single 8-pin power connector, a suggested PSU of 450 W, and a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. The N1 16SM is an IGP with no TDP recorded, no power connectors, no suggested PSU, and a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface. Display outputs are 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1 on the AMD part, versus 1x HDMI on the NVIDIA part. The AMD part supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The NVIDIA part lists N/A for all three API categories.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE belongs to the Radeon RX 7000 series and uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture. Its codename is Hotpink Bonefish, and it comes from the Navi III (RX 7000) generation. It is fabricated by TSMC on a 6 nm process with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². The part contains 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, 32 ray tracing cores, and no tensor cores.

The NVIDIA N1 16SM uses the GB20B chip built on Blackwell 2.0 architecture and comes from the Blackwell IGP (N1x) generation. It is fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process with an unknown transistor count on a 382 mm² die. The part contains 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 24 ROPs, 16 ray tracing cores, and 64 tensor cores. The N1 16SM has no codename, series, or predecessor recorded.

The architectural contrast is sharp. The AMD part uses a smaller, denser 6 nm die with 13,300 million transistors. The NVIDIA part uses a larger 5 nm die, 382 mm² versus 204 mm², with an unknown transistor count. The AMD part has twice the ROPs (64 versus 24) and twice the ray tracing cores (32 versus 16). The NVIDIA part has 64 tensor cores, a feature the AMD part lacks entirely. The NVIDIA part is also the only one of the two with a process node advantage, 5 nm versus 6 nm, both from TSMC.

The RX 7650 GRE is the successor to Navi II and has Navi IV listed as its successor. The N1 16SM has no predecessor or successor recorded. The AMD part's production status is Active, and the NVIDIA part's production status is also Active.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE wins on measured performance. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2336 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 83109 give it a recorded performance profile that the N1 16SM cannot match in the database. Its average benchmark score of 42723 and 83rd percentile placement put it near the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, Quadro M6000 24 GB, RTX 5050 Mobile, and Quadro M6000, all within a 1.2% to 1.3% spread. The AMD part also wins on compute throughput with 22.08 TFLOPS FP32, on pixel rate at 172.5 GPixel/s, on texture rate at 345.0 GTexel/s, and on memory bandwidth at 288.0 GB/s.

The NVIDIA N1 16SM wins on memory capacity and interface. Its 128 GB of LPDDR5X dwarfs the 8 GB of GDDR6 on the AMD part, and its 256 bit bus is double the AMD part's 128 bit bus. The PCIe 5.0 x16 interface is two generations ahead of the AMD part's PCIe 4.0 x8. The N1 16SM also has 64 tensor cores, which the RX 7650 GRE does not list, and a larger die at 382 mm². Its IGP form factor with no power connectors and no suggested PSU means it requires no discrete power delivery, unlike the RX 7650 GRE's 170 W TDP, 8-pin connector, and 450 W suggested PSU.

The use-case split follows the data. The RX 7650 GRE suits workloads where measured rasterization and compute performance matter, given its recorded 3DMark and Geekbench scores, its 83rd percentile ranking, and its DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 API support. The N1 16SM suits memory-heavy workloads that can use 128 GB of unified LPDDR5X, and systems that need a PCIe 5.0 x16 connection and integrated graphics with no external power. Its lack of recorded benchmarks and its 50th percentile placement mean its performance class is unverified in the database.