AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER Comparison
AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER
The Verdict
The recorded data separates these two cards into entirely different performance tiers. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER wins the only shared benchmark, 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, with a score of 6269.5 against the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE's 2336, a delta of 62.7% in NVIDIA's favor. The AMD card sits at the 83rd percentile among all GPUs in the database, while the NVIDIA card sits at the 36th percentile. This percentile gap is counterintuitive at first glance, but the average benchmark scores clarify it: the RX 7650 GRE has an average score of 42723 across its two recorded tests, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has an average of 6270 from a single test. The RX 7650 GRE's higher percentile reflects its broader benchmark profile, not superiority in the shared DirectX 12 workload.
The data indicates a clear pick for users prioritizing raw 3DMark Steel Nomad performance: the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. The AMD card's nearest rivals in average score are the RTX 4070 SUPER at 43223 (1.2% higher), the Quadro M6000 24 GB at 43262 (1.2% higher), and the RTX 5050 Mobile at 43268 (1.3% higher). The NVIDIA card's nearest rivals are the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 at 6270 (0% delta), the Quadro K620 at 6282 (0.2% higher), and the AMD FirePro W600 at 6223 (0.8% lower). The RX 7650 GRE competes with upper-midrange desktop and mobile parts, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER sits in a higher absolute score band despite its lower percentile ranking.
Where Each One Wins
The RX 7650 GRE wins in the OpenCL compute benchmark, scoring 83109 on Geekbench OpenCL. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has no recorded OpenCL score in the database, so the AMD card takes the only uncontested win in a non-raytracing workload. The NVIDIA card wins the sole head-to-head test, 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, by a decisive margin. The RX 7650 GRE also holds advantages in transistor density and pixel throughput relative to its die size, but these are architectural traits, not benchmark wins.
Users who run DirectX 12 3DMark Steel Nomad workloads should expect the NVIDIA card to dominate. Users who run OpenCL compute tasks, where the AMD card has a recorded score, may find the RX 7650 GRE more competitive, but the database lacks a direct comparison for that test. The NVIDIA card has no OpenCL result, so the AMD card's 83109 stands alone.
Architecture Differences
The two GPUs come from different generations and foundry nodes. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE uses the Navi 33 chip on RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish, built on TSMC's 6 nm process. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses the GB203 chip on Blackwell 2.0 architecture, built on TSMC's 5 nm process. The transistor counts diverge sharply: AMD packs 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, giving a density of 65.2M per mm². NVIDIA packs 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, giving a density of 120.6M per mm². The NVIDIA die is 85% larger by area and holds more than three times the transistors.
Shader resources differ by a wide margin. The RX 7650 GRE has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 ROPs, and 32 ray tracing cores. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 8960 shading units, 280 TMUs, 96 ROPs, and 70 RT cores. The NVIDIA card also includes 280 tensor cores, while the AMD card has no tensor core count listed. Pixel rate favors NVIDIA at 235.4 GPixel/s versus 172.5 GPixel/s. Texture rate favors NVIDIA at 686.6 GTexel/s versus 345.0 GTexel/s. FP32 compute reaches 43.94 TFLOPS on the NVIDIA card versus 22.08 TFLOPS on the AMD card, and FP16 matches at 43.94 TFLOPS versus 22.08 TFLOPS, both at 1:1 ratios.
Memory configurations separate the cards further. The RX 7650 GRE uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 896.0 GB/s. The NVIDIA card has twice the capacity and more than three times the bandwidth. The AMD card's memory clock is 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective), while the NVIDIA card's is 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The higher effective data rate on NVIDIA compensates for the lower physical clock.
Clock behavior differs as well. The RX 7650 GRE has a base clock of 1720 MHz, a boost clock of 2695 MHz, and a game clock of 2350 MHz. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2452 MHz, with no game clock listed. The AMD card boosts higher, but the NVIDIA card's base clock is 575 MHz higher, indicating a different power and thermal design.
FAQ
Q: Which card has the higher 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score?
A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER scores 6269.5, while the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE scores 2336. NVIDIA wins by 62.7% in this test.
Q: Does the AMD card win any benchmark against the NVIDIA card?
A: The AMD card has a Geekbench OpenCL score of 83109, but the NVIDIA card has no recorded OpenCL result. The only shared head-to-head test, 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, goes to NVIDIA.
Q: How do memory capacities and bandwidths compare?
A: The AMD card has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The NVIDIA card has 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth.
Q: Which card has more shading units and ray tracing cores?
A: The NVIDIA card has 8960 shading units and 70 RT cores. The AMD card has 2048 shading units and 32 RT cores.
Q: What process nodes do the two cards use?
A: The AMD RX 7650 GRE uses TSMC's 6 nm process. The NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses TSMC's 5 nm process.
Q: What are the launch MSRP values?
A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE has a launch MSRP of 279 USD. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a launch MSRP of 749 USD.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The only shared benchmark in the database is 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER scores 6269.5, and the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE scores 2336. The delta is 62.7% in NVIDIA's favor. This is a large margin, consistent with the raw specification differences: the NVIDIA card has 4.4 times the shading units, 2.2 times the texture units, 1.5 times the ROPs, and 2.2 times the ray tracing cores. Its FP32 throughput of 43.94 TFLOPS is nearly double the AMD card's 22.08 TFLOPS. Memory bandwidth of 896.0 GB/s versus 288.0 GB/s gives the NVIDIA card a 3.1 times advantage in data feeding capacity.
The AMD card's best recorded result is its Geekbench OpenCL score of 83109. No equivalent OpenCL score exists for the NVIDIA card in the database, so a direct comparison is not possible. The AMD card's average benchmark score of 42723 reflects its two tests, while the NVIDIA card's average of 6270 reflects its single test. The percentile rankings, 83rd for AMD and 36th for NVIDIA, should be read with this context: they aggregate different test sets.
The nearest rivals for the AMD card show it clustering around the RTX 4070 SUPER (43223, 1.2% higher), the Quadro M6000 24 GB (43262, 1.2% higher), and the RTX 5050 Mobile (43268, 1.3% higher). The nearest rivals for the NVIDIA card show it matching the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 exactly (6270, 0% delta), with the Quadro K620 0.2% higher and the AMD FirePro W600 0.8% lower. These rival deltas suggest the RX 7650 GRE sits in a performance class near the RTX 40-series midrange, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER sits near the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER class in the Steel Nomad metric.
Specification Differences
The two cards differ across nearly every recorded specification. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE uses the Navi 33 chip, RDNA 3.0 architecture, and a 6 nm TSMC process. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses the GB203 chip, Blackwell 2.0 architecture, and a 5 nm TSMC process. Transistor counts are 13,300 million for AMD and 45,600 million for NVIDIA. Die sizes are 204 mm² and 378 mm², respectively. Transistor density is 65.2M per mm² for AMD and 120.6M per mm² for NVIDIA.
Clock speeds diverge. The AMD base clock is 1720 MHz, boost is 2695 MHz, and game clock is 2350 MHz. The NVIDIA base clock is 2295 MHz and boost is 2452 MHz, with no game clock. Memory clocks are 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) for AMD and 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) for NVIDIA. Memory size is 8 GB GDDR6 for AMD versus 16 GB GDDR7 for NVIDIA. Bus widths are 128 bit and 256 bit. Bandwidth is 288.0 GB/s versus 896.0 GB/s.
Compute resources differ by multiples. Shading units: 2048 versus 8960. TMUs: 128 versus 280. ROPs: 64 versus 96. RT cores: 32 versus 70. Tensor cores: none listed for AMD, 280 for NVIDIA. Pixel rate: 172.5 GPixel/s versus 235.4 GPixel/s. Texture rate: 345.0 GTexel/s versus 686.6 GTexel/s. FP32: 22.08 TFLOPS versus 43.94 TFLOPS. FP16: 22.08 TFLOPS versus 43.94 TFLOPS, both 1:1.
Power and physical specifications also differ. TDP is 170 W for AMD and 350 W for NVIDIA. Both are dual-slot cards. The AMD card uses a single 8-pin power connector, while the NVIDIA card uses a single 16-pin connector. The suggested PSU for the AMD card is 450 W; no suggested PSU is listed for the NVIDIA card. Bus interfaces are PCIe 4.0 x8 for AMD and PCIe 5.0 x16 for NVIDIA. Display outputs are 1x HDMI 2.1a plus 3x DisplayPort 2.1 for AMD, and 1x HDMI 2.1b plus 3x DisplayPort 2.1b for NVIDIA.
Dimensions differ substantially. The AMD card is 204 mm long and 115 mm tall, with no width listed. The NVIDIA card is 304 mm long, 137 mm tall, and 48 mm wide. The NVIDIA card is 100 mm longer and 22 mm taller. API support is identical: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 on both. Release dates are 2025-02-06 for AMD and 2025-12-31 for NVIDIA. Both cards are active in production. The AMD card's predecessor is Navi II and successor is Navi IV; no predecessor or successor is listed for the NVIDIA card.