AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE

CORE STATE Navi 33
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2695 MHz
TDP 170 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 4080

CORE STATE AD103
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2505 MHz
TDP 320 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
2,336
6,567
geekbench_opencl
83,109
214,739
geekbench_vulkan
N/A
263,779
passmark_directx_10
N/A
204
passmark_directx_11
N/A
314
passmark_directx_12
N/A
132
passmark_directx_9
N/A
370
passmark_g2d
N/A
1,239
passmark_g3d
N/A
34,457
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
20,671

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains two shared benchmark results between the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 and the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE, and the NVIDIA card wins both by substantial margins. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the RTX 4080 scores 6,567 points against the RX 7650 GRE's 2,336 points. That is a delta of 181.1%, meaning the RTX 4080 more than doubles the AMD card's performance in this DirectX 12 workload. The gap is not a narrow edge; it is a dominant, category-level difference.

The second shared test, Geekbench OpenCL, tells a similar story. The RTX 4080 records 214,739 points, while the RX 7650 GRE manages 83,109 points. The delta here is 158.4%, again placing the NVIDIA card far ahead. This is a compute-oriented workload, and the RTX 4080's larger shader array and higher memory bandwidth translate into a massive advantage. The RX 7650 GRE is not within striking distance in either test.

Looking at the broader database averages, the RTX 4080 holds an average benchmark score of 54,247 across all its recorded tests, while the RX 7650 GRE averages 42,723. That is a difference of roughly 27% in favor of the RTX 4080, though the two cards sit in different competitive tiers. The RTX 4080's nearest rivals include the RTX 4080 SUPER (delta 0.1%), the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (delta -1.1%), and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (delta -2.6%). The RX 7650 GRE's nearest rivals are the RTX 4070 SUPER (delta -1.2%), the Quadro M6000 24 GB (delta -1.2%), and the RTX 5050 Mobile (delta -1.3%). These lists show that the RX 7650 GRE competes in a much lower performance bracket, despite its high percentile ranking.

The percentile data reinforces the separation. The RTX 4080 sits at the 86th percentile of all GPUs in the database, while the RX 7650 GRE sits at the 83rd percentile. That three-point difference in percentile may seem small, but the absolute score gap is enormous. Percentile rankings compress near the top end, so a three-point percentile gap can represent a very large raw performance difference. The head-to-head results confirm this: the RTX 4080 is not merely faster, it is in a different performance class.

FAQ

Q: Which card wins in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 wins decisively. It scores 6,567 points versus 2,336 points for the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE, a delta of 181.1%.

Q: How large is the compute performance gap in Geekbench OpenCL?

A: The RTX 4080 records 214,739 points compared to 83,109 points for the RX 7650 GRE, a delta of 158.4% in NVIDIA's favor.

Q: What are the average benchmark scores for each card?

A: The RTX 4080 has an average benchmark score of 54,247 across all its recorded tests. The RX 7650 GRE has an average score of 42,723.

Q: How do the two cards rank among all GPUs in the database?

A: The RTX 4080 is at the 86th percentile of all GPUs, while the RX 7650 GRE is at the 83rd percentile.

Q: Which card has a higher memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4080 has a memory bandwidth of 716.8 GB/s, while the RX 7650 GRE has 288.0 GB/s. The NVIDIA card offers more than double the bandwidth.

Q: Are both cards currently in production?

A: No. The RTX 4080 is marked as end-of-life, while the RX 7650 GRE is listed as active production.

Architecture Differences

The two cards come from fundamentally different architectural designs. The RTX 4080 uses the AD103 chip based on NVIDIA's Ada Lovelace architecture, built on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The RX 7650 GRE uses the Navi 33 chip based on AMD's RDNA 3.0 architecture, built on a 6 nm process, also at TSMC. The process node difference is meaningful: 5 nm versus 6 nm gives the NVIDIA chip a density advantage, though the AMD chip is much smaller in absolute terms.

The transistor counts highlight the scale difference. The RTX 4080 packs 45,900 million transistors on a die size of 379 mm², yielding a transistor density of 121.1 million per mm². The RX 7650 GRE has 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, with a density of 65.2 million per mm². The RTX 4080 is not only larger, it is also more densely packed, which explains part of its performance lead.

The memory subsystems differ completely. The RTX 4080 uses 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus, achieving 716.8 GB/s of bandwidth. The RX 7650 GRE uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, achieving 288.0 GB/s. The bus width is halved, the memory type is slower, and the capacity is halved. This is a structural difference, not a tuning difference.

The compute resources diverge sharply. The RTX 4080 has 9,728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, 112 render output units, 76 ray tracing cores, and 304 tensor cores. The RX 7650 GRE has 2,048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 32 ray tracing cores, with no tensor cores listed. The RTX 4080 also supports NVIDIA's tensor core technology, which the RX 7650 GRE lacks entirely. The pixel rate for the RTX 4080 is 280.6 GPixel/s, versus 172.5 GPixel/s for the RX 7650 GRE. The texture rate is 761.5 GTexel/s versus 345.0 GTexel/s.

The API support is identical: both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The RTX 4080 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, while the RX 7650 GRE uses PCIe 4.0 x8. The x8 link halves the available bandwidth to the host system, which can matter in some CPU-bound scenarios, though the database does not include specific tests for that.

Specification Differences

The most obvious specification gap is memory. The RTX 4080 has 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus with 716.8 GB/s bandwidth. The RX 7650 GRE has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s. This is a 2x difference in capacity and a roughly 2.5x difference in bandwidth.

The clock speeds differ in interesting ways. The RTX 4080 has a base clock of 2,205 MHz and a boost clock of 2,505 MHz. The RX 7650 GRE has a lower base clock of 1,720 MHz but a higher boost clock of 2,695 MHz, plus a game clock of 2,350 MHz. The AMD card boosts higher, but the NVIDIA card maintains a much higher base clock, which can matter for sustained workloads.

The power requirements are starkly different. The RTX 4080 has a TDP of 320 W and requires a 700 W power supply, using a single 16-pin connector. The RX 7650 GRE has a TDP of 170 W and requires a 450 W power supply, using a single 8-pin connector. The RX 7650 GRE draws less than half the power of the RTX 4080, which affects system build requirements and thermal output.

Physical dimensions also differ. The RTX 4080 is 310 mm long, 140 mm tall, and 61 mm wide, and takes up a triple-slot space. The RX 7650 GRE is 204 mm long and 115 mm tall, with no width listed, and takes up a dual-slot space. The RX 7650 GRE is substantially shorter and lower profile, making it easier to fit in smaller cases.

The display outputs differ. The RTX 4080 offers 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. The RX 7650 GRE offers 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1. The AMD card supports the newer DisplayPort 2.1 standard, which is a notable advantage for future high-refresh-rate monitors.

The RTX 4080 was released on 2022-09-19, while the RX 7650 GRE was released on 2025-02-06. The RTX 4080 is end-of-life, and its successor is the GeForce 50 series. The RX 7650 GRE is active, and its successor is Navi IV. The RTX 4080's launch MSRP is 1,199 USD, and the RX 7650 GRE's launch MSRP is 279 USD.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous. The RTX 4080 wins both head-to-head benchmarks by margins exceeding 150%, and its average benchmark score is about 27% higher than the RX 7650 GRE. The RTX 4080 is the faster card in every measured dimension: more shading units, more memory bandwidth, more texture units, and more ray tracing cores. It sits at the 86th percentile versus the 83rd percentile for the RX 7650 GRE.

However, the verdict depends on what the user prioritizes. The RTX 4080 is a high-end card with a 320 W TDP, a triple-slot footprint, and a launch MSRP of 1,199 USD. The RX 7650 GRE is a mid-range card with a 170 W TDP, a dual-slot footprint, and a launch MSRP of 279 USD. The RX 7650 GRE is also currently in active production, while the RTX 4080 is end-of-life. If the user needs maximum performance and has the power and space budget, the RTX 4080 is the clear choice. If the user needs a smaller, lower-power card that is still actively sold, the RX 7650 GRE is the only one of the two that fits that profile.

The percentile rankings show that both cards are above average in the database, but the RTX 4080 is in a different league. The nearest rivals for the RTX 4080 are all within a few percent of its average score, which shows how competitive the high end is. The nearest rivals for the RX 7650 GRE are also within a few percent, but that cluster sits at a much lower absolute score level.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4080 wins in raw performance. It dominates the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test by 181.1% and the Geekbench OpenCL test by 158.4%. It has more than double the memory bandwidth, more than four times the shading units, and more than double the texture fill rate. For any workload that stresses the GPU, the RTX 4080 is the winner.

The RX 7650 GRE wins in efficiency and physical footprint. It has a TDP of 170 W versus 320 W, which means it generates less heat and requires a smaller power supply (450 W versus 700 W). It is a dual-slot card versus a triple-slot card, and it is 204 mm long versus 310 mm long. It uses a single 8-pin connector instead of a 16-pin connector, which is more compatible with older power supplies. It also supports DisplayPort 2.1, while the RTX 4080 only supports DisplayPort 1.4a.

The RX 7650 GRE also wins on production status. It is active, while the RTX 4080 is end-of-life. For a user buying new hardware today, the RX 7650 GRE is a current product. The RTX 4080 is a previous-generation card with a successor already in the market.

In terms of use cases, the RTX 4080 is for high-resolution gaming, heavy compute tasks, and ray tracing workloads where its 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores can be utilized. The RX 7650 GRE is for 1080p or 1440p gaming in smaller builds, where its lower power draw and compact size are advantages. The data does not show how each card performs in specific games, but the raw benchmark scores strongly favor the RTX 4080 in any GPU-bound scenario.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RX 7650 GRE
RTX 4080
Core Specs
Shading Units
2,048
9,728 +375.0%
Shaders
2,048
9,728 +375.0%
TMUs
128
304 +137.5%
ROPs
64
112 +75.0%
Compute Units
32
SM Count
76
Clocks
Base Clock
1720 MHz
2205 MHz
Boost Clock
2695 MHz
2505 MHz
Game Clock
2350 MHz
Shader Clock
2350 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective
1400 MHz 22.4 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
8 GB
16 GB
VRAM (MB)
8,192
16,384 +100.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6X
Memory Bus
128 bit
256 bit
Bandwidth
288.0 GB/s
716.8 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
2 MB
64 MB
L3 Cache
32 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
172.5 GPixel/s
280.6 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
345.0 GTexel/s
761.5 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
22.08 TFLOPS
48.74 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
689.9 GFLOPS (1:32)
761.5 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
22.08 TFLOPS (1:1)
48.74 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
32
76 +137.5%
Tensor Cores
304
Matrix Cores
64
Power
TDP
170 W
320 W
TDP (W)
170
320 +88.2%
Suggested PSU
450 W
700 W
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
1x 16-pin
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Ada Lovelace
GPU Name
Navi 33
AD103
Codename
Hotpink Bonefish
Generation
Navi III (RX 7000)
GeForce 40
Process Size
6 nm
5 nm
Transistors
13,300 million
45,900 million
Die Size
204 mm²
379 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
65.2M / mm²
121.1M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.2
3.0
CUDA
8.9
Shader Model
6.9
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Triple-slot
Length
204 mm 8 inches
310 mm 12.2 inches
Height
115 mm 4.5 inches
140 mm 5.5 inches
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a3x DisplayPort 2.1
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
279 USD
1,199 USD
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
Navi II
GeForce 30
Successor
Navi IV
GeForce 50
View Radeon RX 7650 GRE Details View GeForce RTX 4080 Details