AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Comparison

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE occupy very different tiers of the graphics card market, and the benchmark data reflects a decisive performance gap. Across the two shared direct comparisons, the RTX 4070 Ti wins both, with margins exceeding 100% in each test. The RTX 4070 Ti posts an average benchmark score of 44,795, placing it in the 84th percentile of all GPUs, while the RX 7650 GRE averages 42,723, sitting just one percentile lower at 83. Despite the closeness in percentile ranking, the head-to-head results show that the NVIDIA card is in a different performance class, driven by its larger memory subsystem, higher compute throughput, and more robust feature set.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking divergence appears in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, where the RTX 4070 Ti scores 5,024 against the RX 7650 GRE’s 2,336. That is a delta of 115.1% — meaning the NVIDIA card delivers more than double the frame throughput in this modern DirectX 12 workload. Such a wide margin suggests that the RX 7650 GRE struggles with the geometry and ray-tracing demands of Steel Nomad, while the RTX 4070 Ti’s 60 dedicated RT cores and 240 tensor cores provide ample headroom. For gamers targeting high refresh rates at 1440p or 4K in DX12 titles, this single result is a strong indicator of where each card excels.

The Geekbench OpenCL test tells a similar story, though with slightly less extreme separation. The RTX 4070 Ti scores 176,953, while the RX 7650 GRE manages 83,109, yielding a 112.9% advantage for NVIDIA. OpenCL performance is heavily influenced by raw compute throughput, and the numbers align with the spec sheets: the RTX 4070 Ti delivers 40.09 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, nearly double the RX 7650 GRE’s 22.08 TFLOPS. This compute advantage extends to professional workloads and AI inference tasks that leverage OpenCL, making the RTX 4070 Ti the clear choice for users who need general-purpose GPU compute.

Notably, the RX 7650 GRE has no wins in any head-to-head comparison. The data available shows exactly two benchmark tests, and NVIDIA takes both. While the RX 7650 GRE’s average score of 42,723 is respectable — it sits within 1.2% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, which averages 43,223 — the gap to the RTX 4070 Ti is substantial. In absolute terms, the RTX 4070 Ti’s average score of 44,795 is only 2.0% higher than the RX 7650 GRE’s, but that aggregate figure is skewed by the RTX 4070 Ti’s additional benchmark entries (PassMark tests, Geekbench Vulkan), which inflate its average relative to the RX 7650 GRE’s limited data set.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4070 Ti wins decisively in every measurable category. In synthetic gaming benchmarks, its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5,024 is more than double the RX 7650 GRE’s, indicating superiority in DirectX 12 Ultimate workloads, including ray tracing and mesh shading. The card’s 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus provides 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth, compared to the RX 7650 GRE’s 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus at 288.0 GB/s. This bandwidth advantage translates directly to higher texture fill rates — 626.4 GTexel/s versus 345.0 GTexel/s — and better performance in high-resolution textures and multi-sample anti-aliasing.

For compute-heavy tasks, the RTX 4070 Ti’s 40.09 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 1:1 FP16 ratio make it a formidable workstation card. The RX 7650 GRE’s 22.08 TFLOPS is halved, and its 32 RT cores are fewer than the RTX 4070 Ti’s 60. In OpenCL workloads, the RTX 4070 Ti’s 176,953 score versus 83,109 for the AMD card means tasks like video encoding, physics simulations, and machine learning inference run nearly twice as fast on the NVIDIA side. The RX 7650 GRE also lacks tensor cores entirely, which are listed as null in the specification data, meaning no dedicated AI acceleration hardware — a significant omission for users running DLSS or other tensor-based features.

Where the RX 7650 GRE could be considered a winner is in power efficiency and physical footprint, though the data does not provide direct benchmark wins. Its TDP of 170 W is 115 W lower than the RTX 4070 Ti’s 285 W, and it requires a single 8-pin power connector versus the RTX 4070 Ti’s 16-pin. The RX 7650 GRE is also shorter at 204 mm (8 inches) compared to 285 mm (11.2 inches) for the RTX 4070 Ti, and its suggested PSU of 450 W is 150 W lower. For users with small form factor cases or modest power supplies, the RX 7650 GRE has practical advantages, but the benchmark data shows no scenario where it outperforms the RTX 4070 Ti in raw performance.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti in 3DMark Steel Nomad?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti scores 5,024, while the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE scores 2,336, giving NVIDIA a 115.1% lead — more than double the performance.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each card?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti averages 44,795 across all its benchmark entries, placing it in the 84th percentile of all GPUs. The RX 7650 GRE averages 42,723, sitting in the 83rd percentile.

Q: Which card has higher memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti offers 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth via 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus. The RX 7650 GRE has 288.0 GB/s using 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus.

Q: Does the RX 7650 GRE have tensor cores?

A: No. The specification data lists tensor cores as null for the RX 7650 GRE, whereas the RTX 4070 Ti has 240 tensor cores.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of each card?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti launched at 799 USD, while the RX 7650 GRE launched at 279 USD.

Q: Which card is closer to the RTX 4070 SUPER in average score?

A: The RX 7650 GRE’s average score of 42,723 is within 1.2% of the RTX 4070 SUPER’s 43,223, according to nearest rival data.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every core specification. The RTX 4070 Ti uses the AD104 chip with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, while the RX 7650 GRE uses the Navi 33 chip with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die. Transistor density is 121.8M per mm² for NVIDIA versus 65.2M per mm² for AMD. The RTX 4070 Ti has 7,680 shading units, 240 TMUs, and 80 ROPs; the RX 7650 GRE has 2,048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. RT core counts are 60 versus 32, and the RTX 4070 Ti adds 240 tensor cores while the RX 7650 GRE has none. Clock speeds show a mixed picture: the RTX 4070 Ti boosts to 2,610 MHz from a 2,310 MHz base, while the RX 7650 GRE boosts higher to 2,695 MHz from a 1,720 MHz base, with a 2,350 MHz game clock. Memory differs in type, size, and speed: GDDR6X at 21 Gbps effective for NVIDIA versus GDDR6 at 18 Gbps for AMD. Power draw is 285 W for the RTX 4070 Ti versus 170 W for the RX 7650 GRE, with the former using a 16-pin connector and the latter an 8-pin. The RTX 4070 Ti uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while the RX 7650 GRE uses PCIe 4.0 x8. Display outputs also differ: the RTX 4070 Ti has 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, whereas the RX 7650 GRE has 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide is fundamental. NVIDIA’s Ada Lovelace architecture, built on a 5 nm TSMC process, powers the RTX 4070 Ti. AMD’s RDNA 3.0, codenamed "Hotpink Bonefish," uses a 6 nm TSMC process. The process node difference explains part of the transistor density gap: 121.8M per mm² on 5 nm versus 65.2M per mm² on 6 nm. The RTX 4070 Ti is part of the GeForce 40-series, with a predecessor in GeForce 30 and a successor in GeForce 50. The RX 7650 GRE belongs to the Radeon RX 7000 series, following Navi II and preceding Navi IV. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API-level features are matched. However, the RTX 4070 Ti’s 60 RT cores and 240 tensor cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI features like DLSS, while the RX 7650 GRE’s 32 RT cores lack tensor core support, limiting its AI capabilities. The RTX 4070 Ti is end-of-life, released in January 2023, while the RX 7650 GRE is active, released in February 2025. The RTX 4070 Ti’s dual-slot design at 285 mm length is physically larger than the RX 7650 GRE’s 204 mm dual-slot card, reflecting the former’s higher power envelope and larger cooler requirements.