AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE vs NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A Comparison

The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE and the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A occupy different corners of the graphics card spectrum, and the benchmark data reflects that starkly. The RX 7650 GRE is a desktop-oriented part with a substantial performance lead, while the MX570 A is a low-power mobile chip designed for basic acceleration. The head-to-head data shows a single shared benchmark, Geekbench OpenCL, where the AMD card scores 83,109 against the NVIDIA's 39,780—a dominant 108.9% advantage. This is not a close contest; it is a generational and architectural gap made visible in raw compute output.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only directly comparable benchmark in the fact pack is Geekbench OpenCL, and the result is decisive. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE achieves a score of 83,109, while the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A manages 39,780. The delta is 108.9%, meaning the AMD card is more than twice as fast in this OpenCL workload. This is a massive gap, and it stems from the fundamental differences in their designs—the RX 7650 GRE is a full desktop GPU with 22.08 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, whereas the MX570 A is a 25-watt mobile chip with just 4.731 TFLOPS. In practical terms, the AMD card will handle compute-heavy tasks like rendering or machine learning inference with far greater ease, while the NVIDIA chip is suited for light acceleration on thin-and-light laptops.

Looking at the broader benchmark context, the RX 7650 GRE's average benchmark score is 42,723, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER (43,223, -1.2% delta) and the Quadro M6000 24 GB (43,262, -1.2% delta), meaning it is essentially on par with those much more expensive workstation and high-end gaming cards in aggregate performance. The MX570 A, by contrast, has an average score of 38,691, which lands it in the 81st percentile—a surprisingly high percentile given its low absolute score, but this reflects the fact that many GPUs in the database are older or weaker integrated solutions. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon Pro 580X (38,706, 0% delta), indicating that the MX570 A sits at the very bottom of the discrete GPU performance ladder.

The RX 7650 GRE also has a second benchmark result, 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, where it scores 2,336. This test is not available for the MX570 A, so a direct comparison is impossible, but the score itself is indicative of a card that can handle modern DirectX 12 Ultimate titles at 1080p with high settings. The MX570 A, with its 2 GB of memory and 64-bit bus, would struggle with the same workload due to bandwidth and capacity constraints, even if its compute cores could keep up—which they cannot.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE than the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A in OpenCL?

A: The RX 7650 GRE scores 83,109 in Geekbench OpenCL, while the MX570 A scores 39,780. This gives the AMD card a 108.9% lead, meaning it is over twice as fast in this compute benchmark.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each GPU, and how do they compare to their nearest rivals?

A: The RX 7650 GRE has an average benchmark score of 42,723, which is 1.2% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER's 43,223. The MX570 A averages 38,691, which is exactly on par with the AMD Radeon Pro 580X's 38,706.

Q: Which GPU has a higher percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The RX 7650 GRE ranks in the 83rd percentile, while the MX570 A ranks in the 81st percentile. Despite the massive performance gap, both are in the top quintile because the database includes many older and integrated graphics solutions.

Q: Does the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A have any benchmark where it wins?

A: No. In the head-to-head data, the RX 7650 GRE wins 1 benchmark (Geekbench OpenCL) and the MX570 A wins 0. The NVIDIA card has no winning results against the AMD card.

Q: What are the memory configurations of these two cards?

A: The RX 7650 GRE has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, yielding 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The MX570 A has 2 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, yielding 96.00 GB/s of bandwidth—a 3x difference in capacity and bandwidth.

Q: Which card has a higher FP32 compute throughput?

A: The RX 7650 GRE delivers 22.08 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, compared to 4.731 TFLOPS for the MX570 A. This is a 4.7x difference in raw floating-point throughput.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE wins outright in every measurable category from the fact pack. It is the only choice for any workload that demands significant GPU compute, such as gaming at 1080p with high settings, 3D rendering, video editing, or any OpenCL-accelerated application. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,336 confirms its capability in modern DirectX 12 titles, and its 8 GB of memory provides enough headroom for high-resolution textures and larger datasets. The fact that it is within 1.2% of the RTX 4070 SUPER in average score means it punches far above its class, making it a serious contender for budget-conscious builders who want desktop-class performance without the premium price tag.

The NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A, on the other hand, wins in the domain of power efficiency and portability. With a TDP of just 25 W and an IGP slot width, it is designed for ultra-thin laptops where space and cooling are at a premium. Its 2 GB of memory and 64-bit bus are sufficient for basic tasks like video playback, light photo editing, or running older games at low settings. It has no power connectors and is end-of-life, indicating it is a legacy part that was never meant for high-performance workloads. The MX570 A also has 64 tensor cores, which gives it some AI acceleration capability, but the 4.731 TFLOPS FP32 throughput severely limits its usefulness for any modern AI or compute task.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ on nearly every specification. The RX 7650 GRE is built on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, while the MX570 A uses an 8 nm process at Samsung, with 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die. The AMD card has a base clock of 1720 MHz and a boost clock of 2695 MHz, versus 832 MHz base and 1155 MHz boost for the NVIDIA card. Memory is another chasm: the RX 7650 GRE has 8 GB GDDR6 at 18 Gbps effective on a 128-bit bus, while the MX570 A has 2 GB GDDR6 at 12 Gbps effective on a 64-bit bus. This results in 288.0 GB/s versus 96.00 GB/s of bandwidth.

The shading units are identical in count (2048 each), but the AMD card has 128 TMUs and 64 ROPs, compared to 64 TMUs and 32 ROPs for the NVIDIA card. Ray tracing cores differ as well: 32 on the AMD side versus 16 on the NVIDIA side. The MX570 A has 64 tensor cores, while the RX 7650 GRE has none listed. Pixel rate is 172.5 GPixel/s for AMD versus 36.96 GPixel/s for NVIDIA, and texture rate is 345.0 GTexel/s versus 73.92 GTexel/s. The RX 7650 GRE has a TDP of 170 W and requires a 450 W PSU, while the MX570 A sips 25 W and needs no external power. The AMD card is a dual-slot desktop card with a 204 mm length, while the NVIDIA card is an IGP (integrated graphics package) with no dimensions listed.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap is generational. The RX 7650 GRE is based on RDNA 3.0, using the Navi 33 chip with the codename "Hotpink Bonefish." It belongs to the Navi III (RX 7000) generation and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Its predecessor is Navi II, and it has a successor in Navi IV. The MX570 A uses the older Ampere architecture with the GA107SB chip, and it belongs to the GeForce MX (5xx) generation. It also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, but it is end-of-life with no listed predecessor or successor. The process node difference—6 nm versus 8 nm—gives AMD a density advantage (65.2M transistors per mm² versus 43.5M), which translates to better efficiency and higher clocks. The RX 7650 GRE also has a game clock of 2350 MHz, a feature absent on the MX570 A.

The display outputs differ as well: the RX 7650 GRE has 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, while the MX570 A's outputs are "Portable Device Dependent," meaning they rely on the host laptop's connections. The AMD card is an active production part, released on 2025-02-06, while the NVIDIA card was released on 2021-12-16 and is no longer in production. This time gap explains much of the performance disparity—the RX 7650 GRE benefits from years of architectural improvements and a more advanced manufacturing process.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE is the superior performer in every benchmark and specification category. It offers 108.9% higher OpenCL performance, 4.7x the FP32 throughput, 3x the memory bandwidth, and 4x the memory capacity compared to the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A. The RX 7650 GRE is the clear choice for any user who needs a desktop GPU for gaming, content creation, or compute workloads. Its average benchmark score of 42,723 places it within 1.2% of the RTX 4070 SUPER, making it a high-value option for those building a new system. It is an active product with modern features like DisplayPort 2.1 and a 2025 release date, ensuring long-term relevance.

The NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A is a different kind of product. It is an end-of-life mobile chip designed for ultra-low-power laptops, and its 25 W TDP and IGP form factor make it suitable for basic acceleration in thin-and-light devices. It wins in portability and power efficiency—categories not measured in the benchmark data—but loses everywhere else. Its 81st percentile ranking is misleadingly high, as it reflects the weak average of the GPU population rather than any inherent strength. For anyone who needs a GPU for actual graphics or compute work, the RX 7650 GRE is the only rational choice. The MX570 A should only be considered if the use case is limited to basic display output and video playback on a battery-constrained laptop, where its minimal power draw is an asset.