AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE vs NVIDIA GeForce MX570 Comparison

The Verdict

The data presents a stark contrast between two GPUs aimed at entirely different segments. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE is a recent, active desktop part, while the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 is an end-of-life mobile chip from a previous generation. Based strictly on benchmark results, the RX 7650 GRE is the clear performance leader, delivering a 117% higher Geekbench OpenCL score (83109 vs 38299). This is not a close contest; it is a generational and architectural gap that places the AMD part in a different performance class entirely.

The RX 7650 GRE sits at the 83rd percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 42723. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER (43223, just 1.2% higher) and the RTX 5050 Mobile (43268, 1.3% higher), indicating it competes in the upper-mid range of desktop and high-end mobile territory. The MX570, at the 81st percentile, is not far off in percentile ranking (81 vs 83), but this is misleading. Its average score of 38299 is dramatically lower, and its nearest rivals are the RTX 5080 Mobile (38349, 0.1% higher) and the RTX 4080 Mobile (38135, 0.4% lower). The percentile field appears to reflect a different scoring scale or database normalization, but the raw head-to-head data is unambiguous: the RX 7650 GRE more than doubles the MX570's OpenCL output.

For a buyer, the choice is straightforward. If the requirement is a desktop GPU for modern gaming or compute workloads, the RX 7650 GRE is the only viable option between these two. The MX570, with its 2 GB memory and 15 W power envelope, is suited only for thin-and-light laptops where battery life and thermals trump raw performance. The data does not support any scenario where the MX570 is the preferable choice for performance, but it is the only one of the two that is portable-device dependent and designed for IGP integration. The verdict, therefore, is conditional: the RX 7650 GRE for any performance-critical task, the MX570 only for ultra-mobile form factors where the RX 7650 GRE cannot physically be installed.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide between these two GPUs is foundational, starting with the manufacturing process and chip design. The RX 7650 GRE is built on TSMC's 6 nm node, packing 13,300 million transistors into a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2 million per mm². The MX570 uses Samsung's 8 nm process, with 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die, for a density of 43.5 million per mm². This means the AMD chip achieves 52.9% higher transistor density on a nearly identical die area, a direct result of the more advanced fabrication node.

The core architectures are entirely different generations. The RX 7650 GRE uses RDNA 3.0 (codenamed "Hotpink Bonefish") from the Navi III (RX 7000) generation, while the MX570 is based on Ampere with the GA107S chip. This is not a minor revision but a leap from NVIDIA's 2021-era architecture to AMD's 2025 release. The RX 7650 GRE has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 64 raster operation pipelines (ROPs). The MX570 also has 2048 shading units but only 64 TMUs and 32 ROPs — exactly half the texture and pixel processing capacity. The ray tracing hardware also differs: the RX 7650 GRE has 32 RT cores, double the MX570's 16, and the NVIDIA part has 64 tensor cores for which AMD has no direct equivalent listed.

Memory architecture amplifies the gap. The RX 7650 GRE features 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The MX570 has 2 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, yielding 96.00 GB/s — exactly one-third the bandwidth. Clock speeds follow suit: the RX 7650 GRE boosts to 2695 MHz, while the MX570's boost is 1155 MHz. The AMD part's base clock of 1720 MHz is higher than the MX570's boost clock, illustrating the fundamental performance ceiling difference. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API feature parity exists, but the hardware underneath is on different planets.

Power and physical design are also divergent. The RX 7650 GRE has a 170 W TDP, requires a dual-slot cooler, and a single 8-pin power connector with a 450 W suggested PSU. The MX570 is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) with a 15 W TDP, no power connectors, and dimensions listed as "Portable Device Dependent." The RX 7650 GRE is 204 mm long and 115 mm tall, whereas the MX570 has no listed physical dimensions because it is designed to be soldered onto a laptop motherboard.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE scores 83109 in Geekbench OpenCL, while the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 scores 38299. The RX 7650 GRE leads by 117% in the only head-to-head benchmark available.

Q: How do their memory configurations compare?

A: The RX 7650 GRE has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The MX570 has 2 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, providing 96.00 GB/s bandwidth. The AMD part has four times the memory capacity and three times the bandwidth.

Q: Are these GPUs from the same generation?

A: No. The RX 7650 GRE is from the Radeon RX 7000 series (RDNA 3.0 architecture, released 2025-02-06), while the MX570 is from NVIDIA's GeForce MX (5xx) generation (Ampere architecture, released 2021-12-16).

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The RX 7650 GRE has a TDP of 170 W and requires a 450 W suggested PSU, while the MX570 has a TDP of 15 W and no power connector. The MX570 is designed for integrated use in portable devices.

Q: Which GPU has better ray tracing performance?

A: Based on the hardware specifications, the RX 7650 GRE has 32 RT cores compared to the MX570's 16 RT cores. No direct ray tracing benchmark is provided, but the AMD part has double the dedicated ray tracing hardware.

Q: Is the MX570 comparable to the RX 7650 GRE in any metric?

A: Both have 2048 shading units, both use GDDR6 memory, and both support PCIe 4.0 x8. Additionally, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. However, in every performance-related metric, the RX 7650 GRE is substantially ahead.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE | NVIDIA GeForce MX570 |

|---|---|---|

| Process Node | 6 nm (TSMC) | 8 nm (Samsung) |

| Transistors | 13,300 million | 8,700 million |

| Die Size | 204 mm² | 200 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 65.2M / mm² | 43.5M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 1720 MHz | 832 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2695 MHz | 1155 MHz |

| Game Clock | 2350 MHz | N/A |

| Memory Clock | 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |

| Memory Size | 8 GB | 2 GB |

| Memory Bus Width | 128 bit | 64 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 96.00 GB/s |

| TMUs | 128 | 64 |

| ROPs | 64 | 32 |

| RT Cores | 32 | 16 |

| Tensor Cores | N/A | 64 |

| Pixel Rate | 172.5 GPixel/s | 36.96 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 345.0 GTexel/s | 73.92 GTexel/s |

| FP32 Performance | 22.08 TFLOPS | 4.731 TFLOPS |

| FP16 Performance | 22.08 TFLOPS (1:1) | 4.731 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 170 W | 15 W |

| Slot Width | Dual-slot | IGP |

| Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |

| Suggested PSU | 450 W | N/A |

| Display Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1 | Portable Device Dependent |

| Dimensions | 204 mm (L) x 115 mm (H) | N/A |

| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |

| Release Date | 2025-02-06 | 2021-12-16 |

| Launch MSRP | 279 USD | N/A |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only direct benchmark comparison available is Geekbench OpenCL, and the result is decisive. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE scores 83109, while the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 scores 38299. This represents a 117% advantage for the AMD part — meaning the RX 7650 GRE delivers more than double the raw compute performance of the MX570 in this test. The delta is so large that it transcends mere architectural refinement; it indicates a completely different performance tier.

Contextualizing against their respective nearest rivals clarifies where each stands. The RX 7650 GRE's average benchmark score of 42723 places it within 1.3% of the RTX 4070 SUPER (43223) and RTX 5050 Mobile (43268). These are modern, high-performance GPUs, and the RX 7650 GRE is essentially matching them. The MX570's average score of 38299 sits within 1% of the RTX 5080 Mobile (38349) and RTX 4080 Mobile (38135). Interestingly, the MX570 is 0.4% ahead of the RTX 4080 Mobile, but this is cold comfort given that the absolute scores are less than half of the RX 7650 GRE's result.

The win tally reflects this: the RX 7650 GRE records 1 win in the head-to-head benchmarks, the MX570 records 0. There is no benchmark in the data where the MX570 outperforms the RX 7650 GRE. The FP32 compute figures reinforce this — the RX 7650 GRE delivers 22.08 TFLOPS versus the MX570's 4.731 TFLOPS, a 4.67x gap. Texture and pixel rates follow the same pattern: 345.0 GTexel/s versus 73.92 GTexel/s (4.67x), and 172.5 GPixel/s versus 36.96 GPixel/s (4.67x). These ratios are consistent because they all scale with the clock speed and shader count differences.

Where Each One Wins

The RX 7650 GRE wins in every measurable performance category. Its 8 GB memory capacity is sufficient for modern game textures and large datasets, whereas the MX570's 2 GB is a hard limitation for even mid-range workloads. The 288.0 GB/s bandwidth enables high-resolution texture streaming and compute tasks that the MX570's 96.00 GB/s cannot handle. The 22.08 TFLOPS FP32 throughput makes the RX 7650 GRE suitable for GPU-accelerated rendering, machine learning inference, and content creation. Its 32 RT cores provide a foundation for ray-traced gaming, a feature the MX570's 16 RT cores can only nominally support.

The MX570's only advantages are in power efficiency and physical integration. At 15 W TDP versus 170 W, it consumes 91.2% less power. This makes it the only choice for fanless, ultra-thin laptops where battery life is paramount. Its IGP slot width and lack of power connectors mean it can be embedded in portable devices without the space or thermal overhead required for a dual-slot, 8-pin-powered card. The "Portable Device Dependent" display outputs indicate it is designed for laptops with integrated displays, not external monitor setups.

The use-case split is therefore absolute. The RX 7650 GRE is for desktop builders who want active production hardware with modern features — it is currently in production, while the MX570 is end-of-life. The MX570 is for OEM laptop designs from 2021 that prioritize mobility over performance. There is no overlap: the RX 7650 GRE is 117% faster, has 4x the memory, 3x the bandwidth, and 4.67x the compute throughput. The MX570's 15 W power draw is its sole redeeming quality, and that only matters in a form factor the RX 7650 GRE cannot occupy. For any user who can physically install the RX 7650 GRE, the data leaves no reason to choose the MX570.