AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE vs Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE and the Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem. Instead, the available data consists of separate benchmark entries and aggregate scores that allow for indirect comparison.

The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE delivers a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2336 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 83109. Its average benchmark score across all recorded tests is 42723. The Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem has no recorded individual benchmarks and an average benchmark score of 0, placing it at the 50th percentile among all GPUs.

The AMD card sits at the 83rd percentile versus all GPUs, a substantial gap over Intel's 50th percentile placement. The nearest rivals for the RX 7650 GRE include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER with an average score of 43223 and a delta of -1.2%, the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB at 43262 with -1.2%, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile at 43268 with -1.3%, and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 at 43301 with -1.3%. These deltas indicate the AMD part trails those four competitors by roughly 1.2% to 1.3% in average aggregate scoring.

For the Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem, the absence of benchmark entries means the aggregate score is zero, which is not a meaningful performance indicator but rather a reflection of missing data. The Intel part's 50th percentile ranking versus all GPUs is derived from its specification profile rather than measured results.

The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE shows a clear advantage in recorded performance data. Its average benchmark score of 42723 stands in contrast to the Intel part's zero recorded average. In the absence of direct head-to-head tests, the recorded data indicates that the AMD card delivers measurable results across standard workloads, while the Intel accelerator has no comparable entries in the database.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2336 for the RX 7650 GRE represents a specific DirectX 12 workload result. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 83109 reflects compute-oriented performance. These two data points provide the only direct measurement evidence for either product.

The Verdict

The data suggests two fundamentally different products aimed at different deployment contexts. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE is a consumer-oriented graphics card with recorded benchmark results across multiple test suites. The Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem is a data center accelerator with no recorded benchmark entries in the database.

For anyone selecting a GPU for standard graphics workloads, the RX 7650 GRE offers verified performance numbers. Its 83rd percentile ranking places it above the majority of recorded GPUs. The nearest rival deltas show it clustered tightly with several NVIDIA products, trailing them by just over one percent in average score.

The Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem presents a different profile entirely. With no display outputs, it cannot function as a typical graphics card. The 50th percentile ranking likely derives from its hardware specifications rather than measured results. The absence of benchmark data means the database cannot confirm any performance claims for this part.

The data indicates that the RX 7650 GRE is the only one of the two with demonstrated performance in recorded tests. The Intel part requires a different evaluation approach, one that the current database does not support through measured benchmarks.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Navi III generation within the Radeon RX 7000 series. The chip is fabricated by TSMC on a 6 nm process node, containing 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter.

The Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem uses the Ponte Vecchio chip built on Generation 12.5 architecture, with the generation designation Data Center GPU (Ponte Vecchio). It is fabricated by Intel on a 10 nm process node, containing 100,000 million transistors on a 1280 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 78.1 million per square millimeter.

The Intel part packs roughly 7.5 times the transistor count of the AMD chip but on a die over six times larger. The transistor density favors Intel at 78.1 million per square millimeter versus AMD's 65.2 million.

In terms of compute resources, the RX 7650 GRE contains 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 render output units, and 32 ray tracing cores. The Intel accelerator contains 16,384 shading units, 1024 texture mapping units, 0 render output units, and 128 ray tracing cores.

The absence of render output units in the Intel part aligns with its lack of display outputs. The AMD card's 64 ROPs support its role as a graphics output device.

Memory architecture differs sharply. The RX 7650 GRE uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel part uses 128 GB of HBM2e on an 8192-bit bus with 3.21 TB/s bandwidth. The Intel memory subsystem offers 16 times the capacity, 64 times the bus width, and over 11 times the bandwidth.

The API support also diverges. AMD supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Intel supports DirectX 12 (12_1) and OpenGL 4.6, with no Vulkan support recorded.

Specification Differences

Clock speeds differ substantially. The RX 7650 GRE runs at a base clock of 1720 MHz, a boost clock of 2695 MHz, and a game clock of 2350 MHz. Memory operates at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective. The Intel part runs at a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost clock of 1600 MHz, with memory at 1565 MHz and 3.1 Gbps effective.

The AMD card's boost clock exceeds Intel's by 1095 MHz. The base clock advantage for AMD is 820 MHz.

Compute throughput shows Intel's advantage. The RX 7650 GRE delivers 22.08 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1 ratio). The Intel accelerator delivers 52.43 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16. Intel's FP32 output is 2.37 times higher.

Texture and pixel rates also differ. The AMD card achieves 345.0 GTexel/s and 172.5 GPixel/s. The Intel part achieves 1,638.4 GTexel/s and 0 MPixel/s, the latter reflecting its lack of display output capability.

Power requirements diverge sharply. The RX 7650 GRE has a TDP of 170 W with a suggested PSU of 450 W and a single 8-pin power connector. The Intel part has a TDP of 2400 W with a suggested PSU of 2800 W and a single 16-pin connector. The Intel TDP is over 14 times higher.

The bus interface differs as well. AMD uses PCIe 4.0 x8, while Intel uses PCIe 5.0 x16. The Intel interface offers both a newer generation and double the lane count.

Physical dimensions show the Intel part is longer at 267 mm (10.5 inches) versus AMD's 204 mm (8 inches). Both use dual-slot cooling. The AMD card has a height of 115 mm (4.5 inches), while Intel's height is not recorded.

Display outputs differ completely. The RX 7650 GRE provides 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1. The Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem has no display outputs.

Release dates differ by over two years. The AMD card launched on 2025-02-06, while the Intel part launched on 2023-01-09. The AMD card's predecessor is Navi II and successor is Navi IV. The Intel part has no recorded predecessor and its successor is H3C Graphics.

The AMD card has a launch MSRP of 279 USD. The Intel part has no recorded launch MSRP.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score in the database?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE has an average benchmark score of 42723. The Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem has an average benchmark score of 0, as no benchmarks are recorded for it.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The nearest recorded rivals are NVIDIA products. The RTX 4070 SUPER scores 43223, the Quadro M6000 24 GB scores 43262, the RTX 5050 Mobile scores 43268, and the Quadro M6000 scores 43301. The AMD card trails each by 1.2% to 1.3%.

Q: What is the memory capacity difference between the two GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory. The Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem has 128 GB of HBM2e memory, which is 16 times the capacity.

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute throughput?

A: The Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem delivers 52.43 TFLOPS FP32, which is more than double the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE's 22.08 TFLOPS FP32.

Q: Can the Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem output video to displays?

A: No. The Intel part has no display outputs recorded in the database. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE includes 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs.

Q: What is the power consumption difference between the two?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE has a TDP of 170 W with a suggested PSU of 450 W. The Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem has a TDP of 2400 W with a suggested PSU of 2800 W.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE wins in every category where measured performance exists. Its recorded benchmark scores, 83rd percentile ranking, and average score of 42723 demonstrate verified capability. The card provides display outputs, supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, and runs on a 170 W power envelope. Its 279 USD launch MSRP places it in the consumer market segment.

The Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem wins on raw compute specifications. Its 52.43 TFLOPS FP32 output, 128 GB HBM2e memory, 3.21 TB/s memory bandwidth, and 16,384 shading units represent a different performance class. The 2,400 W TDP and 2,800 W suggested PSU indicate a deployment environment with substantial power infrastructure.

The AMD card wins for any workload requiring graphical output, DirectX 12 Ultimate support, or Vulkan compatibility. Its 8 GB memory and 128-bit bus suit mainstream graphics tasks. The 288.0 GB/s bandwidth supports standard gaming and workstation loads.

The Intel part wins for compute-heavy data center workloads where massive memory capacity and bandwidth matter. The 8192-bit bus and 3.21 TB/s bandwidth provide exceptional data throughput. The 128 ray tracing cores exceed the AMD card's 32, suggesting stronger ray tracing compute capability.

The recorded data shows the AMD card as the only one with demonstrated benchmark results. The Intel part's specifications indicate theoretical compute advantages, but the database contains no measurements to confirm them. The RX 7650 GRE's 83rd percentile placement reflects actual test outcomes, while the Intel part's 50th percentile ranking appears based on specifications alone.

The power efficiency comparison favors AMD decisively. The RX 7650 GRE delivers 22.08 TFLOPS at 170 W. The Intel part delivers 52.43 TFLOPS at 2400 W. The AMD card achieves roughly 130 TFLOPS per kilowatt, while the Intel part achieves approximately 22 TFLOPS per kilowatt.

The form factor comparison shows the AMD card at 204 mm length fits standard consumer cases. The Intel part at 267 mm length is longer and designed for rack-mounted data center systems. Both use dual-slot cooling.

The bus interface difference matters for system integration. The Intel part's PCIe 5.0 x16 offers more bandwidth than the AMD card's PCIe 4.0 x8. However, the AMD interface remains adequate for its bandwidth requirements.

The release timeline shows Intel launched its accelerator over two years before AMD released the RX 7650 GRE. The AMD card belongs to the Radeon RX 7000 series with Navi III generation, while the Intel part has no series designation and uses the Data Center GPU (Ponte Vecchio) generation label.

The database shows no head-to-head benchmark entries and no wins recorded for either product. The comparison therefore rests on the separate recorded data for each. The AMD card has measurable results; the Intel part does not. That distinction shapes every conclusion available from the data.