AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE vs Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE and the Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and neither product registers a win in direct comparison tests. This absence of overlapping test data requires analysis to rely on the individual benchmark scores and architectural specifications recorded for each product.

For the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE, two benchmark results are present in the database. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the card records a score of 2336 points. In the Geekbench OpenCL test, it records 83109 points. The average benchmark score across all recorded tests for this card is 42723 points, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs in the database. This percentile placement indicates that the card outperforms roughly four out of five GPUs tracked in the database.

The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile has no individual benchmark scores recorded. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, and its percentile placement is 50th among all GPUs. The 50th percentile placement, combined with the absence of any recorded test scores, indicates that the database has not yet captured measurable performance results for this integrated processor.

The nearest rivals for the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE provide context for its recorded average score. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER shows an average score of 43223, which is 1.2 percent higher than the AMD card's 42723 average. The NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB records 43262, also 1.2 percent higher. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile records 43268, 1.3 percent higher, and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 records 43301, 1.3 percent higher. The AMD card therefore trails each of these four rivals by a margin of 1.2 to 1.3 percent, a narrow gap that places it in the same performance tier as these discrete GPUs.

The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile has no nearest rivals recorded in the database, meaning no comparative delta percentages can be derived from the data. The only percentile signal available is the 50th percentile placement, which indicates median performance among all tracked GPUs. Without benchmark scores or rival deltas, the database provides no quantitative basis for comparing the Intel part directly against any other GPU.

Architecture Differences

The two products diverge sharply in architecture, process technology, and physical implementation. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Navi III generation of the RX 7000 series. The chip is manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC, containing 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2 million transistors per square millimeter. The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile uses the Wildcat Lake chip built on Xe3-LPG architecture, belongs to the Arc Graphics-M generation, and is manufactured on a 3 nm process at Intel. Its transistor count, die size, and transistor density are all listed as unknown in the database.

Clock behavior differs substantially. The AMD card runs a base clock of 1720 MHz, a boost clock of 2695 MHz, and a game clock of 2350 MHz. Memory clocks at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective data rate. The Intel part has a base clock of just 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2500 MHz, with no game clock listed. The low base clock suggests a power-optimized design characteristic of an integrated processor.

Memory configuration presents the largest structural difference. The AMD card carries 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128 bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel part uses System Shared memory, with system dependent bandwidth and no dedicated memory bus width. This means the AMD card has a fixed, dedicated memory pipeline while the Intel part depends entirely on the host system's memory subsystem.

Compute resources show a wide gap. The AMD card contains 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 render output units, and 32 ray tracing cores. The Intel part contains 256 shading units, 16 texture mapping units, 8 render output units, and 2 ray tracing cores. The AMD card's pixel rate is 172.5 GPixel/s and texture rate is 345.0 GTexel/s. The Intel part delivers 20.00 GPixel/s and 40.00 GTexel/s. Floating point throughput is listed as 22.08 TFLOPS for FP32 on the AMD card with a 1:1 ratio for FP16. The Intel part delivers 1,280.0 GFLOPS for FP32 and 2.560 TFLOPS for FP16 at a 2:1 ratio.

Power and physical design differ entirely. The AMD card has a TDP of 170 W, uses a dual-slot cooler, requires a single 8-pin power connector, and lists a suggested power supply of 450 W. It connects via PCIe 4.0 x8 and measures 204 mm in length and 115 mm in height. The Intel part has a TDP of 25 W, is an IGP with no power connectors, no suggested PSU, and an IGP bus interface. Its dimensions are not recorded. Display outputs on the AMD card include 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, while the Intel part's outputs are portable device dependent.

Both products support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The AMD card was released on 2025-02-06, while the Intel part has a release date of 2026-04-15. The AMD card lists a predecessor of Navi II and successor of Navi IV. The Intel part lists a predecessor of HD Graphics-M and no successor. The AMD card has a launch MSRP of 279 USD. The Intel part has no launch MSRP recorded.

The Verdict

The recorded data presents two products with fundamentally different roles. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE is a discrete, dual-slot graphics card with dedicated 8 GB GDDR6 memory, 2048 shading units, 22.08 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, and a 170 W TDP. Its average benchmark score of 42723 places it in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs, within 1.3 percent of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile, and NVIDIA Quadro M6000. The data confirms this card performs at the level of those discrete GPUs, with the narrow delta percentages showing near parity.

The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile is an integrated processor with 256 shading units, system shared memory, 1,280.0 GFLOPS FP32 throughput, and a 25 W TDP. It has no recorded benchmark scores and no nearest rivals. Its 50th percentile placement indicates median standing among all GPUs, but the lack of measured scores prevents any quantitative performance conclusion. The database cannot confirm any specific performance level for this part beyond its percentile placement.

For users selecting between these two, the data supports a clear split. The AMD card is the only one with measured performance, and that performance is competitive with the four nearest rivals. The Intel part is an IGP with a much lower power envelope, suited to systems where integrated graphics are the only option. The AMD card's 83rd percentile score and dedicated memory pipeline make it the choice for workloads requiring sustained graphics throughput. The Intel part's 25 W TDP and integrated nature make it the choice for portable, low-power devices where a discrete card cannot be installed. The release dates also matter: the AMD card was released earlier, while the Intel part is scheduled for a later release. No benchmark data exists to overturn these structural conclusions.

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The database shows the AMD card averages 42723 points. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is 1.2 percent higher, the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB is 1.2 percent higher, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile is 1.3 percent higher, and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 is 1.3 percent higher. The AMD card sits within 1.3 percent of all four.

Q: What benchmark scores are recorded for the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE?

A: The card scores 2336 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 and 83109 in Geekbench OpenCL. Its average benchmark score across recorded tests is 42723.

Q: What benchmark scores are recorded for the Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile?

A: The database lists no individual benchmark scores for the Intel part. Its average benchmark score is recorded as 0, and it has no nearest rivals listed.

Q: What are the memory specifications of each product?

A: The AMD card uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128 bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel part uses System Shared memory with System Shared type, bus width, and system dependent bandwidth.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE has a TDP of 170 W and requires a single 8-pin power connector with a suggested 450 W power supply. The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile has a TDP of 25 W, uses no power connectors, and has no suggested PSU.

Q: Which product has higher shading unit count?

A: The AMD card has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 32 ray tracing cores. The Intel part has 256 shading units, 16 TMUs, 8 ROPs, and 2 ray tracing cores.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE wins in every category where the database records measurable performance. Its 83rd percentile placement against all GPUs demonstrates broad competitiveness. Its dedicated 8 GB GDDR6 memory with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth provides a fixed memory pipeline that does not depend on host system configuration. The 2048 shading units and 22.08 TFLOPS FP32 throughput give it a large compute advantage over the Intel part's 256 shading units and 1,280.0 GFLOPS. The 32 ray tracing cores versus 2 ray tracing cores indicate substantially higher ray tracing throughput. The 170 W TDP and dual-slot cooler show it is designed for sustained, high-load operation in a desktop-class system. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and dedicated display outputs (1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1) make it suitable for multi-display setups.

The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile wins in power efficiency and integration. Its 25 W TDP is dramatically lower than the AMD card's 170 W, making it suitable for systems with no discrete power delivery. As an IGP with no power connectors, it requires no additional PSU capacity. The 3 nm process node at Intel indicates a more advanced manufacturing technology. The base clock of 300 MHz suggests aggressive power saving at idle. Its system shared memory eliminates the need for separate VRAM, reducing system cost and complexity. The portable device dependent display outputs indicate flexibility for laptop and mobile form factors. The later release date of 2026-04-15 means it is a newer design relative to the AMD card's 2025-02-06 release. The FP16 throughput of 2.560 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio shows a different compute ratio than the AMD card's 1:1 FP16 implementation.

The database records no direct head-to-head wins for either product. The AMD card has measured scores and a clear performance profile. The Intel part has no measured scores, so its only recorded advantage is structural: lower power, integrated form factor, and newer process node. The 50th percentile placement for the Intel part indicates median standing among all GPUs, but without benchmark numbers this cannot be quantified further. Users requiring dedicated graphics performance should rely on the AMD card's recorded scores. Users constrained by power or form factor should consider the Intel part's 25 W envelope and IGP design. The data supports no other conclusion.