AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE vs Intel Arc G3 Comparison

AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE vs Intel Arc G3

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE and the Intel Arc G3. The database contains no shared test entries, no comparative scores, and no win counts for either product against the other. This absence of direct comparison data means that any analysis must rely on the individual benchmark scores and the architectural specifications recorded for each part.

The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE delivers a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2336 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 83109. Its average benchmark score across all recorded tests is 42723. The Intel Arc G3 has no recorded benchmarks in the database, with an average benchmark score of 0 and an empty benchmark list. The percentile rankings place the RX 7650 GRE at the 83rd percentile of all GPUs, while the Arc G3 sits at the 50th percentile. The RX 7650 GRE outperforms the Arc G3 by a margin that cannot be quantified directly from the data, but the percentile gap of 33 points indicates a substantial difference in overall standing.

The nearest rivals for the RX 7650 GRE provide context for its performance tier. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER records an average score of 43223, which is 1.2% higher than the RX 7650 GRE. The NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB scores 43262, also 1.2% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile scores 43268, 1.3% higher, and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 scores 43301, 1.3% higher. The RX 7650 GRE sits within 1.3% of all four of these rivals, placing it in a competitive performance band around the 43,000 average score mark. The Intel Arc G3 has no nearest rivals listed, which leaves its competitive positioning undefined beyond its 50th percentile rank.

The RX 7650 GRE achieves an FP32 throughput of 22.08 TFLOPS compared to 6.144 TFLOPS for the Arc G3. The AMD part also leads in pixel rate at 172.5 GPixel/s versus 48.00 GPixel/s, and in texture rate at 345.0 GTexel/s versus 96.00 GTexel/s. These raw throughput figures indicate a clear performance hierarchy, with the RX 7650 GRE delivering roughly 3.6 times the FP32 compute of the Arc G3. The FP16 comparison shows a different ratio: the RX 7650 GRE sustains 22.08 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio, while the Arc G3 reaches 12.29 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio, so the AMD part still leads but by a smaller factor of about 1.8.

The Verdict

The data points to distinct roles for each product. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE is a discrete desktop graphics card with a 170 W TDP, dual-slot cooler, and a single 8-pin power connector. It targets the mainstream desktop segment and produces benchmark scores that place it near the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, within 1.2% to 1.3% across the nearest rivals. The Intel Arc G3 is an integrated graphics processor with a 25 W TDP, no power connectors, and no slot width, built for mobile or portable devices where power efficiency and space take priority over raw performance.

The RX 7650 GRE uses 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Arc G3 relies on System Shared memory with bandwidth described as System Dependent. The discrete memory subsystem of the RX 7650 GRE provides dedicated bandwidth that the shared-memory architecture of the Arc G3 cannot match, although the exact performance impact is not quantified in the database. The RX 7650 GRE also shows a production status of Active with a release date of February 6, 2025, while the Arc G3 shows a later release date of May 31, 2026.

The verdict from the recorded data is straightforward. The RX 7650 GRE is the higher-performance option by every measured metric, including FP32 throughput, pixel rate, texture rate, memory bandwidth, and percentile ranking. The Arc G3 is the lower-power, integrated alternative that fits into portable systems where a 25 W TDP and shared memory are acceptable trade-offs. Users who need discrete gaming-class performance should select the RX 7650 GRE. Users who need an integrated graphics solution for a compact or low-power platform should consider the Arc G3, but they should expect significantly lower compute throughput.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE belongs to the Radeon RX 7000 series and uses the Navi 33 chip built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture. Its codename is Hotpink Bonefish, and it is part of the Navi III (RX 7000) generation. The Intel Arc G3 uses the Panther Lake chip with the Xe3-LPG architecture and belongs to the Arc Graphics-M (Panther Lake) generation. The process nodes differ substantially: the RX 7650 GRE uses a 6 nm process at TSMC, while the Arc G3 uses a 3 nm process at Intel. The RX 7650 GRE has 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². The Arc G3 has unknown transistor count, die size, and density in the database.

The RX 7650 GRE contains 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 32 ray tracing cores. The Arc G3 contains 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 ray tracing cores. The RX 7650 GRE leads in every execution unit count, with 1.6 times the shading units, 3.2 times the TMUs, 3.2 times the ROPs, and 3.2 times the ray tracing cores. Neither product lists tensor cores in the database.

The FP16 to FP32 ratio differs between the two architectures. The RX 7650 GRE delivers FP16 at a 1:1 ratio with FP32, meaning it processes both at the same rate of 22.08 TFLOPS. The Arc G3 delivers FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, reaching 12.29 TFLOPS against its 6.144 TFLOPS FP32 figure. The 2:1 ratio on the Arc G3 indicates a doubled FP16 rate relative to its own FP32 throughput, a common design choice for integrated graphics that handle mixed workloads. The RX 7650 GRE does not double its FP16 rate, keeping both at the same throughput.

Specification Differences

The RX 7650 GRE has a base clock of 1720 MHz, a boost clock of 2695 MHz, and a game clock of 2350 MHz. The Arc G3 has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz, with no game clock listed. Memory clocks differ as well: the RX 7650 GRE runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective data rate, while the Arc G3 uses System Shared memory, so no dedicated memory clock applies.

The memory configuration separates the two products clearly. The RX 7650 GRE has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Arc G3 has System Shared memory, System Shared type, System Shared bus width, and System Dependent bandwidth. The RX 7650 GRE uses PCIe 4.0 x8 as its bus interface, while the Arc G3 uses IGP, indicating it connects directly to the processor rather than through a PCIe slot. The RX 7650 GRE has a TDP of 170 W, a suggested PSU of 450 W, and requires one 8-pin power connector. The Arc G3 has a 25 W TDP, no suggested PSU, and no power connectors. The RX 7650 GRE occupies a dual-slot form factor with dimensions of 204 mm length and 115 mm height. The Arc G3 is an IGP with no recorded dimensions.

Display outputs also differ. The RX 7650 GRE provides one HDMI 2.1a port and three DisplayPort 2.1 outputs. The Arc G3 lists Portable Device Dependent outputs, reflecting its integrated nature in mobile systems. Both products support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The RX 7650 GRE has a launch MSRP of 279 USD; the Arc G3 has no launch MSRP listed.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE has an average benchmark score of 42723, while the Intel Arc G3 has an average benchmark score of 0 with no recorded benchmarks.

Q: How does the RX 7650 GRE compare to its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER has an average score of 43223, which is 1.2% higher than the RX 7650 GRE.

Q: What is the FP32 throughput difference between the two GPUs?

A: The RX 7650 GRE delivers 22.08 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the Arc G3 delivers 6.144 TFLOPS.

Q: What memory configuration does each GPU use?

A: The RX 7650 GRE uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Arc G3 uses System Shared memory with System Dependent bandwidth.

Q: What are the TDP figures for each GPU?

A: The RX 7650 GRE has a TDP of 170 W, and the Arc G3 has a TDP of 25 W.

Q: Which GPU has a higher percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The RX 7650 GRE ranks at the 83rd percentile, while the Arc G3 ranks at the 50th percentile.

Where Each One Wins

The RX 7650 GRE wins in every measured performance category. Its FP32 throughput of 22.08 TFLOPS exceeds the Arc G3's 6.144 TFLOPS by a factor of 3.6. Its pixel rate of 172.5 GPixel/s is 3.6 times the Arc G3's 48.00 GPixel/s. Its texture rate of 345.0 GTexel/s is 3.6 times the Arc G3's 96.00 GTexel/s. The RX 7650 GRE also leads in FP16 at 22.08 TFLOPS versus 12.29 TFLOPS. The RX 7650 GRE has a 288.0 GB/s dedicated memory bandwidth, while the Arc G3 depends on system memory with bandwidth tied to the host platform. The RX 7650 GRE holds a 33-point percentile advantage, ranking 83rd versus 50th.

The Arc G3 wins in power efficiency and physical footprint. Its 25 W TDP is 145 W lower than the RX 7650 GRE's 170 W TDP. The Arc G3 requires no power connectors and no suggested PSU rating, while the RX 7650 GRE needs one 8-pin connector and a 450 W suggested PSU. The Arc G3 is an IGP with no slot width, while the RX 7650 GRE occupies a dual-slot design with 204 mm length and 115 mm height. The Arc G3 also uses a 3 nm process at Intel, which is a smaller process node than the 6 nm TSMC process used by the RX 7650 GRE, although the database does not quantify the efficiency impact.

The RX 7650 GRE suits desktop systems that can accommodate a discrete dual-slot card and supply 450 W through the PSU. The Arc G3 suits portable devices where the 25 W TDP and integrated form factor eliminate the need for external power or slot space. The data does not provide a direct comparison of real-world gaming performance, but the raw throughput advantages of the RX 7650 GRE across FP32, pixel rate, texture rate, and memory bandwidth make it the clear choice for compute-heavy tasks. The Arc G3 offers a lower-power integrated alternative that relies on shared system memory and delivers FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, which may benefit specific mixed workloads despite its lower absolute scores.