AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE vs Intel Arc B770 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database currently contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries for the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE versus the Intel Arc B770. For the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE, two recorded test results exist. The first is a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2336, and the second is a Geekbench OpenCL score of 83109. These figures place the AMD card at the 83rd percentile among all GPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 42723.

The Intel Arc B770, by contrast, has no recorded benchmark scores in the database at this time. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, and its percentile versus all GPUs is 50, which reflects a neutral position pending actual measurement data. This absence of data means that any quantitative comparison between the two cards must rely on the AMD card's existing results and the architectural specifications recorded for both products.

The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE's average benchmark score of 42723 places it within a tight cluster of rival NVIDIA cards. The nearest rivals in the database are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER with an average score of 43223, the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB with 43262, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile with 43268, and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 with 43301. The AMD card trails each of these by a delta of 1.2% to 1.3%, a margin small enough to be considered effectively a tie in practical terms. This indicates that the RX 7650 GRE sits in a competitive performance band, though the database lacks direct scores for the Arc B770 to anchor a side-by-side comparison.

Given the missing benchmark data for the Intel card, the head-to-head discussion necessarily shifts to what each card's specifications imply. The Arc B770 uses the BMG-G31 chip with 4096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 raster output units. The RX 7650 GRE uses the Navi 33 chip with 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. The Intel card's raw throughput figures are higher for pixel and texture rates: 307.2 GPixel/s and 614.4 GTexel/s, versus 172.5 GPixel/s and 345.0 GTexel/s for the AMD card. However, the AMD card's FP32 compute of 22.08 TFLOPS exceeds the Intel card's 19.66 TFLOPS, a reversal that matters for general compute workloads.

The AMD card also has a higher boost clock at 2695 MHz, compared to the Intel card's 2400 MHz. The base clocks differ in the opposite direction, with the Intel card at 2100 MHz and the AMD card at 1720 MHz. These clock differences contribute to the divergent compute and rasterization characteristics, though the absence of direct benchmark results means these remain projections rather than measured outcomes.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE demonstrates its strongest recorded performance in the Geekbench OpenCL test with a score of 83109, which reflects compute-oriented workloads. Its FP32 throughput of 22.08 TFLOPS supports this, as does its 1:1 FP16 to FP32 ratio of 22.08 TFLOPS. For users running general-purpose compute tasks, OpenCL acceleration, or applications that favor symmetrical FP16 and FP32 performance, the recorded data points to the AMD card as the more capable option. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2336 also confirms a baseline of DirectX 12 gaming capability, though no rival scores exist in the database for context.

The Intel Arc B770, while lacking benchmark scores, offers architectural advantages that the database records in detail. Its 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus delivers 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth, exactly double the AMD card's 8 GB and 288.0 GB/s. For workloads that are memory-capacity sensitive, such as large textures, high-resolution assets, or data-heavy compute tasks, the Intel card's memory subsystem is clearly stronger on paper. Its 4096 shading units and 256 TMUs also suggest higher geometry and texture throughput for rasterization-heavy scenes, assuming driver and software support align.

The Intel card's FP16 performance of 39.32 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio indicates that applications leveraging FP16 arithmetic could see substantial acceleration relative to its FP32 rate. This is a distinctive feature not present on the AMD card, which runs FP16 at the same rate as FP32. For machine learning inference, certain image processing pipelines, or other workloads that exploit reduced precision, the Arc B770's specification sheet gives it a clear theoretical edge.

The AMD card counters with a lower power envelope. Its 170 W TDP and suggested 450 W PSU contrast with the Intel card's 225 W TDP and 550 W suggested PSU. The AMD card also uses a single 8-pin power connector, while the Intel card requires a 6-pin plus an 8-pin. For systems with limited power delivery or smaller power supplies, the AMD card is the more accommodating choice based on recorded specifications.

The AMD card also holds a release date advantage, having launched on 2025-02-06, while the Intel card's recorded release date is 2025-12-31. The AMD card is marked as Active in production status, whereas the Intel card has no production status recorded. The AMD card's launch MSRP was 279 USD, a fact that can be stated once per the database's rules.

The Verdict

The recorded data supports a split recommendation based on workload type. For users prioritizing measured compute performance, the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE has actual benchmark scores to justify its position, ranking at the 83rd percentile among all GPUs. Its OpenCL score of 83109 and Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2336 are concrete data points. Its FP32 throughput of 22.08 TFLOPS exceeds the Intel card's 19.66 TFLOPS, making it the stronger choice for FP32-centric compute tasks.

For users prioritizing memory capacity, bandwidth, and raw shading resources, the Intel Arc B770's specifications make it the more compelling option despite the lack of benchmarks. Its 16 GB frame buffer and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth are exactly double the AMD card's figures. Its 4096 shading units and 128 ROPs suggest higher fill-rate potential. The card's FP16 throughput of 39.32 TFLOPS is nearly double its FP32 rate, a feature absent on the AMD card.

The power and physical footprint considerations also factor into the verdict. The AMD card's 170 W TDP and single 8-pin connector make it easier to integrate into a wider range of systems. The Intel card's 225 W TDP and dual connectors demand more from the power supply, with a suggested 550 W unit versus 450 W for the AMD card. Both cards are dual-slot designs, and both offer identical display outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1.

The database shows no measured wins for either card in head-to-head tests, so the verdict rests on the AMD card's recorded benchmarks and the Intel card's architectural specifications. Users who need verified performance data today should look to the AMD card. Users who need maximum memory and bandwidth for workloads that can use them should consider the Intel card, understanding that its performance is unverified in the database at this time.

FAQ

Q: What is the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE's average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE has an average benchmark score of 42723, placing it at the 83rd percentile among all GPUs in the database.

Q: Does the Intel Arc B770 have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No, the Intel Arc B770 currently has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0.

Q: How does the AMD card compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER by 1.2%, the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB by 1.2%, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile by 1.3%, and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 by 1.3% in average benchmark score.

Q: What are the memory specifications for each card?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Arc B770 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which card has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE has 22.08 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, which is higher than the Intel Arc B770's 19.66 TFLOPS.

Q: What power connector configurations do the two cards use?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE uses a single 8-pin connector with a 170 W TDP and a suggested 450 W PSU. The Intel Arc B770 uses a 6-pin plus an 8-pin connector with a 225 W TDP and a suggested 550 W PSU.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 33 chip, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Navi III generation within the Radeon RX 7000 series. The chip is manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². The Intel Arc B770 uses the Xe2-HPG architecture with the BMG-G31 chip, part of the Battlemage generation. It is manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC with a die size of 368 mm², though its transistor count is unknown.

The memory subsystems differ fundamentally. The AMD card uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel card uses 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth. The AMD card's memory clock is 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, while the Intel card's memory clock is 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, and both have identical display outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1.

The compute resources show a clear split. The AMD card has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, with 32 ray tracing cores. The Intel card has double the shading units at 4096, double the TMUs at 256, and double the ROPs at 128, also with 32 ray tracing cores. The pixel rate for the Intel card is 307.2 GPixel/s versus 172.5 GPixel/s for the AMD card. The texture rate for the Intel card is 614.4 GTexel/s versus 345.0 GTexel/s for the AMD card.

Clock speeds and power characteristics diverge as well. The AMD card has a base clock of 1720 MHz, a boost clock of 2695 MHz, and a game clock of 2350 MHz. The Intel card has a base clock of 2100 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz, with no game clock recorded. The AMD card's TDP is 170 W with a suggested 450 W PSU and a single 8-pin connector. The Intel card's TDP is 225 W with a suggested 550 W PSU and a 6-pin plus 8-pin connector configuration.

The bus interfaces differ, with the AMD card using PCIe 4.0 x8 and the Intel card using PCIe 4.0 x16. The AMD card measures 204 mm in length and 115 mm in height, while the Intel card has no dimensions recorded. The AMD card's predecessor is Navi II and its successor is Navi IV, while the Intel card's predecessor is Alchemist with no successor recorded. The AMD card was released on 2025-02-06 with a launch MSRP of 279 USD, while the Intel card's release date is 2025-12-31 with no launch MSRP recorded.