AMD Radeon RX 7600S vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The RX 7600S has recorded benchmark data across multiple test suites, while the LX PRO currently has no benchmark scores in the database. This makes direct numerical comparison impossible at this time. The RX 7600S achieves an average benchmark score of 16696 across its recorded tests, placing it in the 60th percentile of all GPUs tracked. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA T400 4 GB, which scores 16792 on average, a delta of -0.6 percent relative to the RX 7600S, and the NVIDIA T400, which scores 16508, placing the AMD part 1.1 percent ahead. The database also shows the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 at 16504, a 1.2 percent gap in favor of the RX 7600S, and the NVIDIA Tesla M4 at 16932, which sits 1.4 percent ahead of the AMD mobile part.

In specific benchmark tests, the RX 7600S delivers a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1888. Its OpenCL result in Geekbench reaches 68012, while the Vulkan score climbs to 73868. Passmark results include a G3D score of 15408, a G2D score of 776, and a GPU compute score of 6520. Legacy DirectX tests show a Passmark DirectX 9 score of 211, DirectX 11 at 140, DirectX 10 at 74, and DirectX 12 at 65. The LX PRO has no comparable figures recorded, meaning the database cannot yet establish a head-to-head performance margin between the two products.

Because the LX PRO lacks any benchmark entries, the wins tally shows zero victories for each side. The RX 7600S, despite being an integrated graphics solution with a 75 W TDP, posts respectable scores that place it near several discrete workstation and professional GPUs. The data indicates that the RX 7600S sits within a narrow performance band around the 16600 to 16900 average score range, with deltas of no more than 1.4 percent against its nearest listed rivals.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs diverge significantly in their underlying designs. The RX 7600S uses the Navi 33 chip built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Navi Mobile generation within the RX 7000M series. The LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip under the TrueGPU architecture, part of the 7G100 generation, with no codename or series designation recorded.

Both parts are manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The RX 7600S packs 13,300 million transistors onto a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter. The LX PRO has unknown transistor count, die size, and density figures in the database.

The RX 7600S operates with a base clock of 1500 MHz, a boost clock of 2200 MHz, and a game clock of 1865 MHz. Its memory runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective transfer. The LX PRO does not list base, boost, or game clocks, but its memory clock is set at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective transfer.

Shader resources show a substantial gap. The RX 7600S contains 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output pipelines. It also includes 28 ray tracing cores. The LX PRO fields 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, but the database lists no ray tracing core count for this part. Neither GPU lists tensor cores.

The RX 7600S reaches a pixel rate of 140.8 GPixel/s, a texture rate of 246.4 GTexel/s, and FP32 compute of 15.77 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 31.54 TFLOPS using a 2:1 ratio. The LX PRO posts higher throughput figures: 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate, 384.0 GTexel/s texture rate, 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 with the same 2:1 ratio.

The RX 7600S is an integrated graphics processor with no power connectors and a slot width listed as IGP. Its TDP is 75 W. The LX PRO is a dual-slot discrete card measuring 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. It requires a single 16-pin power connector, carries a 225 W TDP, and recommends a 550 W power supply. Both use a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface.

Display outputs differ as well. The RX 7600S lists its outputs as portable device dependent, reflecting its mobile integration. The LX PRO provides four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. API support matches on DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, but the RX 7600S supports Vulkan 1.4 while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3.

The RX 7600S was released on January 3, 2023, with its predecessor listed as Polaris Mobile. The LX PRO carries a release date of March 16, 2026, and has no predecessor or successor recorded. Both are marked as Active in production status.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, while the RX 7600S reaches 15.77 TFLOPS. The LX PRO holds a clear advantage in raw compute throughput.

Q: How much memory does each card provide, and what is the bus width?

A: The RX 7600S offers 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, yielding 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The LX PRO provides 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, giving 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What are the power requirements for each GPU?

A: The RX 7600S is an integrated part with a 75 W TDP and no power connectors. The LX PRO is a dual-slot discrete card with a 225 W TDP, a single 16-pin power connector, and a suggested 550 W power supply.

Q: Do both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate?

A: Yes, both the RX 7600S and the LX PRO support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RX 7600S supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3.

Q: What benchmark scores exist for the LX PRO?

A: The database currently contains no benchmark entries for the LX PRO. Its average benchmark score is recorded as 0, and it has no nearest rivals listed.

Q: How does the RX 7600S rank among all GPUs?

A: The RX 7600S sits in the 60th percentile of all GPUs tracked by the database, with an average benchmark score of 16696.

Specification Differences

The recorded specification differences between the two GPUs are extensive. The RX 7600S uses the Navi 33 chip on RDNA 3.0 architecture with the codename Hotpink Bonefish, while the LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip on TrueGPU architecture with no codename. The RX 7600S belongs to the Navi Mobile generation in the RX 7000M series; the LX PRO belongs to the 7G100 generation with no series.

Transistor count differs: the RX 7600S has 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, while the LX PRO lists unknown values for both. The RX 7600S has a transistor density of 65.2M per mm²; the LX PRO has none recorded.

Clock speeds show the RX 7600S with a 1500 MHz base, 2200 MHz boost, and 1865 MHz game clock. The LX PRO has no base, boost, or game clock recorded. Memory clocks differ: the RX 7600S runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective, the LX PRO at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective.

Memory capacity and bandwidth diverge sharply. The RX 7600S has 8 GB GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX PRO has 24 GB GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Compute resources differ: the RX 7600S has 1792 shading units, 112 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 28 ray tracing cores. The LX PRO has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, with no ray tracing core count listed.

Throughput rates favor the LX PRO. The RX 7600S posts 140.8 GPixel/s pixel rate, 246.4 GTexel/s texture rate, 15.77 TFLOPS FP32, and 31.54 TFLOPS FP16. The LX PRO posts 192.0 GPixel/s, 384.0 GTexel/s, 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16.

Power and physical specifications differ completely. The RX 7600S is an IGP with 75 W TDP, no power connectors, and no suggested PSU. The LX PRO is dual-slot, 248 mm long, 118 mm tall, 48 mm wide, with a 225 W TDP, one 16-pin connector, and a 550 W suggested PSU.

Display outputs: the RX 7600S is portable device dependent, while the LX PRO has four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. Vulkan support differs: 1.4 on the RX 7600S, 1.3 on the LX PRO. Release dates differ: January 3, 2023 for the RX 7600S, March 16, 2026 for the LX PRO. The RX 7600S lists Polaris Mobile as its predecessor; the LX PRO has no predecessor recorded.

The Verdict

The data presents an interesting comparison between a mobile integrated GPU and a large discrete workstation card. The RX 7600S has verified benchmark results, an average score of 16696, and a 60th percentile ranking. It competes closely with the NVIDIA T400 4 GB, NVIDIA T400, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2, and NVIDIA Tesla M4, all within a 1.4 percent delta band. This indicates consistent, measurable performance for a 75 W integrated solution.

The LX PRO, by contrast, offers substantially higher theoretical specifications: 24 GB of memory, 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, 6144 shading units, 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, and a 225 W TDP. These figures point to a card designed for heavy compute workloads. However, the database contains no benchmark scores for the LX PRO, so its real-world performance remains unverified. Its 50th percentile ranking is nominal based on specification positioning, not measured results.

The choice between these two GPUs depends entirely on use case. For portable devices where power consumption matters, the RX 7600S delivers proven performance with a 75 W TDP and no external power requirement. For desktop systems with room for a 248 mm dual-slot card and a 550 W power supply, the LX PRO offers much larger memory capacity, higher bandwidth, more shading units, and higher compute throughput on paper. The absence of benchmark data for the LX PRO means its actual performance cannot be confirmed against the RX 7600S or any other GPU in the database at this time.

The RX 7600S is the only one of the two with recorded measurements, making it the only part with data-backed performance claims. The LX PRO remains a specification-only entry until benchmarks are submitted.