AMD Radeon RX 7600S vs NVIDIA N1X 48SM Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Radeon RX 7600S and the NVIDIA N1X 48SM occupy very different positions in the database. The RX 7600S has a recorded average benchmark score of 16696, placing it at the 60th percentile among all GPUs. The N1X 48SM, by contrast, has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, with an average score of 0 and a 50th percentile ranking. This means direct numerical comparisons are unavailable for most tests; the only meaningful head-to-head data comes from the RX 7600S's nearest rivals.

The RX 7600S's closest competitor in the database is the NVIDIA T400 4 GB, which posts an average score of 16792. That puts the RX 7600S 0.6% behind that card. Against the standard NVIDIA T400, the RX 7600S is 1.1% ahead, with the T400 scoring 16508. The RX 7600S also edges out the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2, which scores 16504, by 1.2%. The NVIDIA Tesla M4, at 16932, is 1.4% ahead of the RX 7600S. These deltas are small, all within a 2.6% band, indicating the RX 7600S sits in a tightly contested performance cluster.

For the N1X 48SM, the database contains no benchmark entries, no nearest rivals, and no head-to-head wins. Its percentile ranking of 50, combined with a zero average score, suggests it is a placeholder or an unmeasured part. The RX 7600S wins all head-to-head comparisons by default, since the N1X 48SM has no recorded test results. The data cannot show where the N1X 48SM would land in any workload, because no measurements exist. This is a fundamental asymmetry: one GPU has a fully populated benchmark suite, the other has none.

Where Each One Wins

The RX 7600S wins in every benchmark category where data exists. Its individual scores span compute and graphics workloads. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it records 1888 points. Geekbench OpenCL yields 68012, and Geekbench Vulkan 73868. Passmark results include DirectX 10 at 74, DirectX 11 at 140, DirectX 12 at 65, and DirectX 9 at 211. The Passmark G2D score is 776, while G3D reaches 15408, and GPU compute hits 6520. These figures give the RX 7600S a versatile profile, with strong results in both legacy DirectX APIs and modern compute workloads.

The N1X 48SM has no wins in any category because no test scores are recorded. Its zero average benchmark score and empty benchmark array confirm this. The database cannot attribute any workload advantage to the N1X 48SM, whether in rasterization, compute, or API-specific tests. The only area where the N1X 48SM differs is in raw specification headroom, which is not a benchmark win. For example, it has 6144 shading units versus 1792 on the RX 7600S, and 192 tensor cores versus none on the AMD part. But without benchmark data, those numbers do not translate into measured performance.

Architecture Differences

The RX 7600S uses the Navi 33 chip, built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Navi Mobile generation (RX 7000M series). The process node is 6 nm at TSMC, with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2 million per mm². The N1X 48SM uses the GB20B chip, based on Blackwell 2.0 architecture, and belongs to the Blackwell IGP (N1x) generation. Its process node is 5 nm at TSMC, with a die size of 382 mm². Transistor count is listed as unknown, and transistor density is not provided.

Memory configurations differ sharply. The RX 7600S has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The N1X 48SM has 128 GB of LPDDR5X on a 256-bit bus, with 273.2 GB/s bandwidth. Clock speeds also diverge. The RX 7600S runs at a base of 1500 MHz, a boost of 2200 MHz, and a game clock of 1865 MHz. The N1X 48SM has a base of 741 MHz and a boost of 2346 MHz, with no game clock listed. Memory clocks are 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) for the AMD part and 1067 MHz (8.5 Gbps effective) for the NVIDIA part.

Compute resources are vastly different. The RX 7600S has 1792 shading units, 112 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 28 ray tracing cores. The N1X 48SM has 6144 shading units, 384 TMUs, 48 ROPs, 48 ray tracing cores, and 192 tensor cores. The pixel rate is 140.8 GPixel/s for the RX 7600S versus 112.6 GPixel/s for the N1X 48SM. Texture rate is 246.4 GTexel/s versus 900.9 GTexel/s. FP32 throughput is 15.77 TFLOPS for the AMD part and 28.83 TFLOPS for the NVIDIA part. FP16 rates are 31.54 TFLOPS (2:1) for the RX 7600S and 28.83 TFLOPS (1:1) for the N1X 48SM.

API support also differs. The RX 7600S supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The N1X 48SM lists DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan all as N/A. The RX 7600S uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while the N1X 48SM uses PCIe 5.0 x16. Both are IGP slot width with no power connectors. Display outputs are portable device dependent for the RX 7600S and 1x HDMI for the N1X 48SM. The RX 7600S has a TDP of 75 W; the N1X 48SM TDP is unknown.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600S has an average benchmark score of 16696. The NVIDIA N1X 48SM has an average score of 0, because no benchmarks are recorded for it.

Q: How far is the RX 7600S from its nearest rival?

A: The RX 7600S is 0.6% behind the NVIDIA T400 4 GB, 1.1% ahead of the NVIDIA T400, 1.2% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2, and 1.4% behind the NVIDIA Tesla M4.

Q: What is the memory capacity difference?

A: The RX 7600S has 8 GB of GDDR6. The N1X 48SM has 128 GB of LPDDR5X, which is 16 times larger.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The NVIDIA N1X 48SM has 6144 shading units, compared to 1792 on the AMD Radeon RX 7600S.

Q: Does the N1X 48SM support DirectX?

A: The database lists DirectX as N/A for the N1X 48SM. The RX 7600S supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2).

Q: What are the process nodes for each GPU?

A: The RX 7600S uses a 6 nm process at TSMC. The N1X 48SM uses a 5 nm process at TSMC.

The Verdict

The data supports the RX 7600S as the only measured performer. It has a full suite of benchmark scores, a 60th percentile ranking, and a 16696 average score. The N1X 48SM has no recorded benchmarks, a 50th percentile ranking, and a zero average score. Any decision based on performance must favor the RX 7600S, since the N1X 48SM cannot be evaluated in any workload.

The RX 7600S is positioned in a tight competitive cluster, with all nearest rivals within 1.4% of its average score. It delivers balanced results across compute and graphics tests, from 1888 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 to 15408 in Passmark G3D. The N1X 48SM offers larger raw specifications, including 128 GB memory, 6144 shading units, and 28.83 TFLOPS FP32, but those specifications are unverified by any benchmark result.

For users selecting a GPU based on recorded data, the RX 7600S is the clear choice. The N1X 48SM remains an unknown quantity, with no measurable performance to compare. The database shows the RX 7600S as an active, shipping product with a 2023 release date, while the N1X 48SM has a 2026 release date and no benchmark presence.

Specification Differences

| Field | AMD Radeon RX 7600S | NVIDIA N1X 48SM |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | Navi 33 | GB20B |

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |

| Process node | 6 nm | 5 nm |

| Die size | 204 mm² | 382 mm² |

| Transistors | 13,300 million | unknown |

| Base clock | 1500 MHz | 741 MHz |

| Boost clock | 2200 MHz | 2346 MHz |

| Game clock | 1865 MHz | N/A |

| Memory clock | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1067 MHz (8.5 Gbps effective) |

| Memory size | 8 GB | 128 GB |

| Memory type | GDDR6 | LPDDR5X |

| Bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |

| Bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 273.2 GB/s |

| Shading units | 1792 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 112 | 384 |

| ROPs | 64 | 48 |

| Ray tracing cores | 28 | 48 |

| Tensor cores | N/A | 192 |

| Pixel rate | 140.8 GPixel/s | 112.6 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 246.4 GTexel/s | 900.9 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 15.77 TFLOPS | 28.83 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 31.54 TFLOPS (2:1) | 28.83 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 75 W | unknown |

| Bus interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |

| Display outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI |

| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | N/A |

| OpenGL | 4.6 | N/A |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | N/A |

| Release date | 2023-01-03 | 2026-05-31 |