AMD Radeon RX 7600S vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records only one shared benchmark between the AMD Radeon RX 7600S and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. In this test, NVIDIA’s card scores 6269.5 points against AMD’s 1888 points. That is a 69.9% deficit for the RX 7600S, meaning the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers roughly 3.3 times the raw performance in this DirectX 12 workload. The gap is decisive, and it aligns with the positioning of the two products: the RX 7600S is a 75 W integrated-GPU-class mobile part, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is a 350 W dual-slot desktop card.

Looking at the wider benchmark averages, the difference becomes even more pronounced. The RX 7600S has an average benchmark score of 16696 across ten tests, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER averages 6270 from its single recorded run. The RX 7600S’s average is dragged up by strong OpenCL and Vulkan results, but those do not reflect modern gaming loads. The 3DMark Steel Nomad result is the only apples-to-apples comparison, and it shows NVIDIA winning every head-to-head encounter in the database, with a clean 1-0 win tally.

For context, the RX 7600S sits at the 60th percentile among all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA T400 4 GB (average score 16792, 0.6% ahead), the NVIDIA T400 (16508, 1.1% behind), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 (16504, 1.2% behind). Those are all low-power or workstation-oriented parts, which underscores that the RX 7600S is not competing in the same performance tier as the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. Meanwhile, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER sits at the 36th percentile, with its nearest rival being the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 at an identical average score of 6270 (0% delta). The other nearby entries, such as the Quadro K620 and FirePro W600, are much older, lower-end cards, which suggests the 36th percentile figure is influenced by the sparse benchmark data available for this new product.

The per-test breakdown for the RX 7600S shows its strongest results in compute-oriented workloads: Geekbench Vulkan at 73868, Geekbench OpenCL at 68012, and Passmark G3D at 15408. Its weakest results appear in older DirectX tests, with Passmark DirectX 9 at 211, DirectX 11 at 140, and DirectX 10 at 74. For the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, only the 3DMark Steel Nomad score is recorded, so no comparison is possible across other test suites. That lack of data means the verdict rests almost entirely on the single shared benchmark, which is overwhelmingly in NVIDIA’s favor.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural generations and process nodes. AMD’s RX 7600S uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0, fabricated on TSMC’s 6 nm process. NVIDIA’s RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses the GB203 chip on Blackwell 2.0, fabricated on TSMC’s 5 nm process. The transistor counts reflect the scale difference: the RX 7600S packs 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, giving a density of 65.2M transistors per mm². The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER contains 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, with a density of 120.6M per mm². That is more than triple the transistor budget and nearly double the density.

Memory configurations diverge sharply. The RX 7600S has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 896.0 GB/s. That is 3.5 times the memory bandwidth and double the capacity. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER also uses a faster memory clock: 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective transfer rate versus the RX 7600S’s 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective.

Compute resources favor NVIDIA by a wide margin. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 8960 shading units, 280 texture mapping units, 96 ROPs, 70 ray tracing cores, and 280 tensor cores. The RX 7600S has 1792 shading units, 112 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 28 ray tracing cores, with no tensor cores listed. Pixel rate for the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is 235.4 GPixel/s versus 140.8 GPixel/s for AMD. Texture rate is 686.6 GTexel/s versus 246.4 GTexel/s. FP32 compute is 43.94 TFLOPS for NVIDIA versus 15.77 TFLOPS for AMD. FP16 output is identical at 43.94 TFLOPS for NVIDIA (1:1 ratio) while AMD reaches 31.54 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio).

Clock speeds also differ substantially. The RX 7600S runs at a 1500 MHz base, 1865 MHz game clock, and 2200 MHz boost. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a 2295 MHz base and 2452 MHz boost, with no game clock recorded. Power envelopes are at opposite ends of the spectrum: the RX 7600S draws 75 W and uses no power connectors, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER draws 350 W and requires a single 16-pin connector. The RX 7600S is integrated into the motherboard (IGP slot width), while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is a dual-slot card measuring 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 48 mm in width.

Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The bus interface differs: PCIe 4.0 x16 for AMD versus PCIe 5.0 x16 for NVIDIA. Display outputs are portable-device dependent for the RX 7600S, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER provides 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. The RX 7600S was released on January 3, 2023, and its predecessor is listed as Polaris Mobile. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a release date of December 31, 2025, with no predecessor or successor listed.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU wins in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER wins with a score of 6269.5 against AMD’s 1888, a 69.9% advantage.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does each card provide?

A: The RX 7600S delivers 256.0 GB/s over a 128-bit GDDR6 bus, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers 896.0 GB/s over a 256-bit GDDR7 bus.

Q: What is the transistor count difference?

A: The RX 7600S has 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 45,600 million on a 378 mm² die.

Q: Does the RX 7600S have tensor cores?

A: No. The RX 7600S lists no tensor cores, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 280 tensor cores.

Q: What are the power requirements?

A: The RX 7600S uses 75 W with no power connectors, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses 350 W with a single 16-pin connector.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER?

A: The launch MSRP is 749 USD. The RX 7600S has no recorded launch MSRP in the database.

The Verdict

The data points to a straightforward conclusion: the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is in a completely different performance class. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad score is 69.9% higher than the RX 7600S, and its compute resources, memory bandwidth, and transistor budget are all multiples of AMD’s part. The RX 7600S occupies the low-power mobile segment, with a 75 W envelope and integrated form factor, making it suitable for thin-and-light laptops where efficiency matters more than raw throughput. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, at 350 W and dual-slot size, is a desktop enthusiast card that trades power efficiency for maximum frame rates.

For users running DirectX 12 workloads, the NVIDIA card is the only rational choice based on the recorded benchmark. The RX 7600S’s average benchmark score of 16696 is inflated by OpenCL and Vulkan results that do not translate to gaming performance, and its nearest rivals are all low-end or older workstation cards. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, despite its sparse benchmark data, delivers a score that places it near the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, which is a well-established high-end part. If the workload is gaming or GPU compute with ray tracing, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is the clear winner. If the requirement is a low-power integrated solution for a portable device, the RX 7600S fills that niche, but it cannot compete on performance.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 7600S | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER |

|----------------|---------------------|----------------------------------|

| Process node | 6 nm | 5 nm |

| Transistors | 13,300 million | 45,600 million |

| Die size | 204 mm² | 378 mm² |

| Transistor density | 65.2M / mm² | 120.6M / mm² |

| Base clock | 1500 MHz | 2295 MHz |

| Boost clock | 2200 MHz | 2452 MHz |

| Game clock | 1865 MHz | Not recorded |

| Memory size | 8 GB | 16 GB |

| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |

| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |

| Memory bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 896.0 GB/s |

| Memory clock | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz, 28 Gbps effective |

| Shading units | 1792 | 8960 |

| TMUs | 112 | 280 |

| ROPs | 64 | 96 |

| Ray tracing cores | 28 | 70 |

| Tensor cores | None | 280 |

| Pixel rate | 140.8 GPixel/s | 235.4 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 246.4 GTexel/s | 686.6 GTexel/s |

| FP32 compute | 15.77 TFLOPS | 43.94 TFLOPS |

| FP16 compute | 31.54 TFLOPS (2:1) | 43.94 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 75 W | 350 W |

| Slot width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Bus interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |

| Display outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b |

| Dimensions | Not recorded | 304 mm x 137 mm x 48 mm |

| Release date | 2023-01-03 | 2025-12-31 |