AMD Radeon RX 7600S vs Intel Arc B770 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data presents an unusual situation for this comparison. The AMD Radeon RX 7600S has a substantial set of benchmark results across multiple test suites, while the Intel Arc B770 currently has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. This means a direct head-to-head numerical comparison is not possible at this time. The RX 7600S delivers an average benchmark score of 16696 across its ten recorded tests, placing it at the 60th percentile among all GPUs tracked by the database. The Arc B770 sits at the 50th percentile with an average score of zero, indicating the database has not yet captured any performance data for this part.

Looking at the RX 7600S results in isolation, the data shows a wide spread across different API tests. In PassMark's DirectX 9 test, the RX 7600S scores 211, which is its strongest legacy API result. The DirectX 10 test shows a score of 74, while DirectX 11 reaches 140 and DirectX 12 drops to 65. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test records a score of 1888. Geekbench results are notably higher in absolute terms: OpenCL returns 68012 and Vulkan reaches 73868. PassMark G3D scores 15408, while GPU compute specifically records 6520. The G2D test shows 776.

The nearest rival data for the RX 7600S provides context for where this mobile GPU sits in the broader landscape. The NVIDIA T400 4 GB averages 16792, which is 0.6% lower than the RX 7600S. The NVIDIA T400 (without the 4 GB designation) averages 16508, putting the AMD part 1.1% ahead. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 averages 16504, also 1.2% behind the RX 7600S. The NVIDIA Tesla M4 averages 16932, placing it 1.4% above the AMD mobile chip. These deltas are all within a narrow band, suggesting the RX 7600S performs in a tightly contested segment of the database.

The Arc B770 has no nearest rivals listed and no benchmark entries, so its head-to-head standing cannot be quantified. The database shows zero wins for either part in direct comparisons, which reflects the absence of head-to-head test records rather than any performance outcome.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural lineages with distinct design priorities. The AMD Radeon RX 7600S uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish, and belongs to the Navi Mobile generation within the RX 7000M series. It is fabricated by TSMC on a 6 nm process node, containing 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter. The Intel Arc B770 uses the BMG-G31 chip based on Xe2-HPG architecture, belonging to the Battlemage generation within the Arc 7 family. Intel also uses TSMC as the foundry, but on a more advanced 5 nm process node. The B770 has a significantly larger die at 368 mm², though its transistor count is listed as unknown in the database, so density cannot be calculated.

Memory architecture differs substantially. The RX 7600S carries 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Arc B770 doubles the capacity to 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, achieving 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Both use 2000 MHz memory clock with 16 Gbps effective transfer rate, but the wider bus on the Intel part doubles the throughput.

Compute resources show a clear scaling difference. The RX 7600S has 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation pipelines, along with 28 ray tracing cores. The Arc B770 more than doubles these counts: 4096 shading units, 256 TMUs, 128 ROPs, and 32 ray tracing cores. This translates to higher theoretical output rates. The RX 7600S achieves 140.8 GPixel/s pixel fill rate and 246.4 GTexel/s texture fill rate, while the Arc B770 reaches 307.2 GPixel/s and 614.4 GTexel/s respectively. Floating point performance follows the same pattern: the RX 7600S delivers 15.77 TFLOPS FP32 and 31.54 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1), whereas the Arc B770 delivers 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 and 39.32 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1).

Clock speeds favor the Intel part. The RX 7600S has a base clock of 1500 MHz, a boost clock of 2200 MHz, and a game clock of 1865 MHz. The Arc B770 has a base clock of 2100 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz, with no separate game clock listed. Power characteristics are dramatically different: the RX 7600S has a TDP of 75 W and is classified as an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with no power connectors, while the Arc B770 has a 225 W TDP, uses a dual-slot form factor, requires one 6-pin and one 8-pin power connector, and lists a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Both support identical API feature sets: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16 for both. Display outputs differ, with the RX 7600S described as portable device dependent, while the Arc B770 offers one HDMI 2.1a and three DisplayPort 2.1 connectors. The RX 7600S was released on January 3, 2023, and lists Polaris Mobile as its predecessor. The Arc B770 has a release date of December 31, 2025, and lists Alchemist as its predecessor.

Where Each One Wins

Without benchmark data for the Arc B770, the win analysis relies entirely on architectural and power considerations from the recorded specifications. The RX 7600S clearly wins in power efficiency and mobility. Its 75 W TDP, IGP form factor, and lack of power connectors make it suitable for thin and light portable devices. The database shows its production status as active, and its benchmark scores place it at the 60th percentile overall.

The Arc B770 wins on raw compute capacity based on the specification data. It has more than double the shading units, TMUs, and ROPs, plus higher pixel and texture rates. The 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 16 GB capacity give it a clear advantage in memory-heavy workloads. Its 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 exceeds the RX 7600S by roughly 25% based on the recorded figures. The B770's 5 nm process node also indicates a more advanced manufacturing technology, though the larger die size suggests higher power draw, which the 225 W TDP confirms.

The RX 7600S's benchmark results show it performs well in Geekbench Vulkan tests, scoring 73868, which is higher than its OpenCL score of 68012. This suggests strong Vulkan API performance relative to its own OpenCL results. In PassMark tests, the DirectX 9 score of 211 far exceeds the DirectX 12 score of 65, indicating the architecture may favor legacy APIs or that driver optimization for newer APIs is still developing. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1888 provides a modern gaming workload data point.

The Arc B770's lack of benchmark scores means the database cannot confirm whether its theoretical advantages translate into real-world wins. The specification gap is large, but without measurements, any performance conclusion remains speculative. The B770's dual-slot design and separate power connectors position it as a desktop-oriented card, while the RX 7600S is clearly a mobile solution.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Arc B770 have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The Arc B770 has an empty benchmark array, an average benchmark score of zero, and no nearest rivals listed. The RX 7600S has ten recorded benchmark scores across 3DMark, Geekbench, and PassMark tests.

Q: How does the RX 7600S compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The RX 7600S averages 16696, which is 0.6% above the NVIDIA T400 4 GB (16792), 1.1% above the NVIDIA T400 (16508), 1.2% above the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 (16504), and 1.4% below the NVIDIA Tesla M4 (16932).

Q: What are the memory capacity and bandwidth differences between the two GPUs?

A: The RX 7600S has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Arc B770 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth, exactly double the bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU has a higher boost clock?

A: The Arc B770 has a boost clock of 2400 MHz, while the RX 7600S has a boost clock of 2200 MHz. The B770 also has a higher base clock at 2100 MHz versus 1500 MHz for the RX 7600S.

Q: What are the power requirements for each GPU?

A: The RX 7600S has a TDP of 75 W, uses an IGP slot width, and requires no power connectors. The Arc B770 has a TDP of 225 W, uses a dual-slot design, requires one 6-pin and one 8-pin power connector, and lists a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same graphics APIs?

A: Yes. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Both also use a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear split between the two products. The RX 7600S is a complete, measured product with ten benchmark results, an active production status, and a percentile ranking of 60. Its performance sits within 1.4% of four NVIDIA rivals, indicating it competes in a well-established performance tier. The 75 W TDP and IGP form factor make it a mobile-focused part, suitable for portable devices where power draw is constrained.

The Arc B770 is an unmeasured product in the database. Its specification sheet shows substantially higher compute resources, memory capacity, and bandwidth, but no benchmark scores exist to confirm real-world behavior. The 225 W TDP and dual-slot design indicate a desktop-oriented part that trades power efficiency for raw throughput. Its 50th percentile ranking is based on no recorded data, so it should not be interpreted as a performance assessment.

For users prioritizing verified performance data, the RX 7600S has the advantage of being fully characterized. The database shows it performs on par with several NVIDIA professional and consumer cards. For users prioritizing peak specification headroom, the Arc B770 offers more shading units, higher clock speeds, double the memory, and double the bandwidth. However, the absence of benchmark results means those specifications remain unvalidated. The choice depends on whether the user values measured performance or theoretical maximums.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 7600S | Intel Arc B770 |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Xe2-HPG |

| Generation | Navi Mobile (RX 7000M) | Battlemage (Arc 7) |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 5 nm |

| Die Size | 204 mm² | 368 mm² |

| Transistors | 13,300 million | unknown |

| Transistor Density | 65.2M / mm² | null |

| Base Clock | 1500 MHz | 2100 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2200 MHz | 2400 MHz |

| Game Clock | 1865 MHz | null |

| Memory Size | 8 GB | 16 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | 128 bit | 256 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 1792 | 4096 |

| TMUs | 112 | 256 |

| ROPs | 64 | 128 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 28 | 32 |

| Pixel Rate | 140.8 GPixel/s | 307.2 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 246.4 GTexel/s | 614.4 GTexel/s |

| FP32 Performance | 15.77 TFLOPS | 19.66 TFLOPS |

| FP16 Performance | 31.54 TFLOPS (2:1) | 39.32 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 75 W | 225 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |

| Suggested PSU | null | 550 W |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1 |

| Release Date | 2023-01-03 | 2025-12-31 |

| Predecessor | Polaris Mobile | Alchemist |

| Production Status | Active | null |

| Percentile vs All GPUs | 60 | 50 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 16696 | 0 |