AMD Radeon RX 7600S vs AMD Radeon Vega 11 Comparison

The AMD Radeon RX 7600S and the AMD Radeon Vega 11 occupy opposite ends of the graphics spectrum, yet both serve distinct segments of the laptop market. The RX 7600S is a modern discrete mobile GPU built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, while the Vega 11 is an older integrated graphics processor from the GCN 5.0 era. The recorded data shows a decisive performance gap, but the specifics of that gap, the architectural chasm between the two, and the use cases for each reveal a more nuanced picture than simple benchmark rankings.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database includes direct head-to-head results for two cross-platform tests, and the outcome is overwhelmingly one-sided. In the Geekbench OpenCL test, the AMD Radeon RX 7600S scored 68,012 points against 13,392 points for the AMD Radeon Vega 11. This translates to a 407.9% advantage for the discrete GPU, a margin that underscores the fundamental difference between a dedicated graphics processor and an integrated solution. The RX 7600S does not merely outperform the Vega 11; it outperforms it by a factor of five, which is the kind of gap that separates playable modern titles from slideshow-level frame rates.

The Vulkan API test tells an even more dramatic story. The RX 7600S recorded a score of 73,868, while the Vega 11 managed only 12,273. The delta here reaches 501.9%, meaning the RX 7600S is roughly six times faster in this particular workload. Vulkan is often used in modern game engines and compute tasks, so this result suggests that the RX 7600S can handle contemporary graphics APIs with far greater ease than the aging Vega 11. The data shows two wins for the RX 7600S and zero for the Vega 11, a clean sweep that leaves little room for interpretation.

Looking at broader benchmark averages reinforces this hierarchy. The RX 7600S holds an average benchmark score of 16,696 across all recorded tests, placing it in the 60th percentile of all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals in this aggregate ranking include the NVIDIA T400 4 GB at 16,792 (a 0.6% difference) and the NVIDIA Tesla M4 at 16,932 (a 1.4% difference). These are tight margins, indicating that the RX 7600S sits in a competitive tier where small variations in testing conditions can shuffle the order. The Vega 11, by contrast, averages 14,352 points and sits in the 56th percentile, with its closest rivals being the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN at 14,373 and the Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics at 14,315. The 2,344-point gap between the two AMD parts in average score is substantial, yet the percentile difference of 4 points shows that both GPUs occupy the lower-to-mid range of the overall distribution.

Individual test scores for the RX 7600S reveal where its strengths lie. In Passmark G3D, it scored 15,408, while its DirectX 11 score was 140 and its DirectX 9 score was 211. The DirectX 10 and DirectX 12 results were 74 and 65 respectively, with a GPU compute score of 6,520. The Vega 11, unfortunately, has no recorded Passmark results in the database, so direct comparisons on that suite are impossible. However, the Geekbench results alone provide sufficient evidence of the RX 7600S's dominance. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test for the RX 7600S came in at 1,888, a score that, while not directly comparable to the Vega 11 due to missing data, further demonstrates its ability to handle modern DirectX 12 workloads.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide between these two GPUs is vast, rooted in different design philosophies separated by several generations of AMD technology. The RX 7600S is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, using the Navi 33 chip under the codename "Hotpink Bonefish." It belongs to the Navi Mobile generation within the RX 7000M series, and it is manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC. This advanced node allows for 13,300 million transistors packed into a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter. The Vega 11, in contrast, relies on the GCN 5.0 architecture with the Picasso chip, built on a 12 nm process at GlobalFoundries. It contains only 4,940 million transistors on a 210 mm² die, resulting in a density of 23.5 million per square millimeter. The RX 7600S achieves nearly three times the transistor density, which is a direct consequence of the newer manufacturing process.

The compute resources differ just as starkly. The RX 7600S features 1,792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation pipelines. It also includes 28 ray tracing cores, a feature entirely absent from the Vega 11, which has no RT cores and only 704 shading units, 44 TMUs, and 8 ROPs. This is a fundamental architectural upgrade: RDNA 3.0 was designed with ray tracing in mind, while GCN 5.0 predates that capability. The Vega 11 does not support hardware-accelerated ray tracing, so any ray-traced workloads would fall back to compute shaders, a slow and inefficient path.

Clock speeds further widen the gap. The RX 7600S has a base clock of 1500 MHz, a boost clock of 2200 MHz, and a game clock of 1865 MHz. The Vega 11 starts at a mere 300 MHz and boosts to 1400 MHz. Even at peak boost, the Vega 11 runs 800 MHz slower than the RX 7600S's base clock. When combined with the higher shader count, the RX 7600S achieves a pixel rate of 140.8 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 246.4 GTexel/s, compared to 11.20 GPixel/s and 61.60 GTexel/s for the Vega 11. Floating point performance tells a similar story: the RX 7600S delivers 15.77 TFLOPS in FP32 and 31.54 TFLOPS in FP16 (at 2:1 ratio), while the Vega 11 manages just 1.971 TFLOPS and 3.942 TFLOPS respectively. That is an eightfold difference in raw compute throughput.

Memory architecture is another point of divergence. The RX 7600S comes with 8 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its memory clock runs at 2000 MHz, which translates to 16 Gbps effective. The Vega 11, being an integrated processor, relies on system shared memory with a system-dependent bandwidth, meaning its performance is tied to the laptop's main RAM configuration. This is a critical limitation: the Vega 11 must contend with system memory latency and bandwidth constraints, while the RX 7600S accesses its own high-speed VRAM without contention. The API support also differs, with the RX 7600S supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4, while the Vega 11 tops out at DirectX 12 (12_1) and Vulkan 1.3.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the AMD Radeon RX 7600S than the AMD Radeon Vega 11 in Vulkan workloads?

A: In the Geekbench Vulkan test, the RX 7600S scored 73,868 against 12,273 for the Vega 11, a 501.9% advantage.

Q: Does the AMD Radeon Vega 11 support ray tracing?

A: No, the Vega 11 has no ray tracing cores. The RX 7600S includes 28 RT cores, which enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing.

Q: What is the memory configuration difference between the two GPUs?

A: The RX 7600S has 8 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Vega 11 uses system shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU has a higher transistor density?

A: The RX 7600S has a density of 65.2 million transistors per square millimeter on a 6 nm process, while the Vega 11 has 23.5 million per square millimeter on a 12 nm process.

Q: What is the production status of each GPU?

A: The RX 7600S is listed as Active, while the Vega 11 is End-of-life.

Q: How do their DirectX feature levels compare?

A: The RX 7600S supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the Vega 11 is limited to DirectX 12 (12_1).

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 7600S | AMD Radeon Vega 11 |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | GCN 5.0 |

| Chip | Navi 33 | Picasso |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 12 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | GlobalFoundries |

| Transistors | 13,300 million | 4,940 million |

| Die Size | 204 mm² | 210 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 65.2M / mm² | 23.5M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 1500 MHz | 300 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2200 MHz | 1400 MHz |

| Memory | 8 GB GDDR6 | System Shared |

| Bus Width | 128 bit | System Shared |

| Bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | System Dependent |

| Shading Units | 1792 | 704 |

| TMUs | 112 | 44 |

| ROPs | 64 | 8 |

| RT Cores | 28 | None |

| Pixel Rate | 140.8 GPixel/s | 11.20 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 246.4 GTexel/s | 61.60 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 15.77 TFLOPS | 1.971 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 31.54 TFLOPS | 3.942 TFLOPS |

| TDP | 75 W | 15 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | IGP |

| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Release Date | 2023-01-03 | 2019-09-29 |

| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |

The Verdict

The data points to an unambiguous conclusion: the AMD Radeon RX 7600S is the superior graphics processor in nearly every measurable way. It wins both head-to-head benchmarks by margins of 407.9% and 501.9%, it offers 8 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory versus shared system memory, and it brings modern features like ray tracing and DirectX 12 Ultimate support. The RX 7600S is designed for users who need discrete GPU performance in a laptop, whether for gaming, content creation, or compute-heavy tasks. Its 75 W TDP and PCIe 4.0 x16 interface indicate a serious mobile solution, one that sits in the 60th percentile of all GPUs and trades blows with dedicated NVIDIA workstation cards like the T400 series.

The Vega 11, meanwhile, is an integrated processor from 2019, now marked as end-of-life. Its 15 W TDP means it sips power, and its "Motherboard Dependent" display outputs make it a flexible option for basic laptops. For everyday tasks like web browsing, office productivity, and legacy games, the Vega 11 remains functional, and its 56th percentile ranking shows it is not the weakest GPU in the database. However, its 1.971 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and lack of dedicated VRAM place it firmly in the entry-level category. The Vega 11 is best suited for budget laptops where battery life matters more than graphics fidelity, and where the user accepts that modern AAA titles will not run at high settings.

There is no scenario where the Vega 11 outperforms the RX 7600S based on the recorded data. The only reasons to choose a system with the Vega 11 would be cost, power efficiency, or the convenience of an integrated solution. For anyone who needs GPU acceleration for gaming, video editing, or 3D rendering, the RX 7600S is the clear choice. Its 68,012 OpenCL score and 73,868 Vulkan score demonstrate that it can handle demanding workloads with ease, while its active production status ensures ongoing driver support. The Vega 11, by contrast, is a legacy product whose successor, the Vega II IGP, has already taken its place. In short, the RX 7600S is a capable discrete GPU for modern laptops, while the Vega 11 is a historical integrated part best left to basic computing tasks.