AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT vs Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data does not include any direct head-to-head benchmark results between these two GPUs. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT has a full set of benchmark scores in the database, while the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has no benchmark scores recorded at all. This makes a direct performance comparison impossible from the available measurements.

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT delivers a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2048, a Geekbench OpenCL result of 74869, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 27793. Its Passmark suite shows a G3D score of 13907 and a GPU compute score of 7140. The average benchmark score across all recorded tests for the AMD part stands at 12710, placing it at the 52nd percentile of all GPUs in the database.

The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual shows an average benchmark score of 0 with no individual test results, placing it at the 50th percentile by default. The absence of measured data means any claimed performance advantage for either card cannot be substantiated through direct comparison.

For context on the AMD card's positioning, its nearest rivals in the database include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 with an average score of 12773, which is 0.5% higher than the RX 7600M XT. The NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm scores 12625, which is 0.7% lower. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 and AMD Radeon Pro 455 both score 12830 and 12831 respectively, each about 0.9% above the RX 7600M XT. These deltas indicate the AMD mobile GPU sits in a tightly contested performance band where small percentage differences separate adjacent products.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT wins in every category where data exists, simply because the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has no recorded benchmark scores. The AMD card shows competitive results across multiple API workloads. Its Passmark DirectX 9 score of 175 and DirectX 10 score of 76 demonstrate legacy API performance, while DirectX 11 reaches 137 and DirectX 12 drops to 58. The G2D score of 894 indicates 2D graphics throughput.

The Intel card cannot be assigned any benchmark wins from the available data. Its specifications suggest different design priorities, but without measured scores, the database cannot confirm where it would excel. The AMD card's compute-oriented results, including the Geekbench OpenCL score of 74869 and Passmark GPU compute score of 7140, position it as a capable compute device in its class.

The absence of Intel benchmark data is itself a notable finding. The database records a 50th percentile ranking for the Intel card purely from its specification baseline, while the AMD card earns its 52nd percentile from actual measured performance. This discrepancy means the Intel card's percentile is provisional until benchmark results populate the database.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs use fundamentally different architectures and manufacturing processes. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT employs the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Navi Mobile generation within the RX 7000M series. The chip is manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC, containing 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2M per mm².

The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual uses the BMG-G21 chip based on Xe2-HPG architecture, part of the Battlemage Pro Series. Intel also uses TSMC as the foundry, but on a 5 nm process. The Intel die is substantially larger at 272 mm² and packs 19,600 million transistors, resulting in a higher density of 72.1M per mm².

Core configurations differ significantly. The AMD GPU has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operations pipelines. It includes 32 ray tracing cores. The Intel GPU provides 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 80 ROPs, but only 20 ray tracing cores. This means the Intel card has 25% more shading units and TMUs, 25% more ROPs, but 37.5% fewer ray tracing cores.

Clock behavior also diverges. The AMD card has a base clock of 1280 MHz, a boost clock of 2469 MHz, and a game clock of 2023 MHz. The Intel card runs a base clock of 2000 MHz and boost of 2400 MHz, with no game clock specified. The AMD part's memory runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, while the Intel part uses 2375 MHz with 19 Gbps effective speed.

Memory subsystems represent a major architectural split. The AMD card uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel card uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 456.0 GB/s. The Intel card offers three times the capacity and 58% more bandwidth, though the AMD card's smaller memory footprint suggests a different target workload.

Calculated throughput values reveal an interesting inversion. Despite fewer shading units, the AMD card achieves 20.23 TFLOPS FP32 and 40.45 TFLOPS FP16, while the Intel card delivers 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 and 24.58 TFLOPS FP16. The AMD card's higher clocks and architecture efficiency drive higher floating-point rates. Pixel rates show 158.0 GPixel/s for AMD versus 192.0 GPixel/s for Intel, while texture rates show 316.0 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s, favoring Intel in both rasterization throughput metrics.

Power and physical design contrast sharply. The AMD card is rated at 120 W TDP, uses no power connectors, and is an IGP form factor. The Intel card draws 400 W TDP, requires a 1x 16-pin power connector, and an 800 W suggested power supply. The Intel card is a dual-slot design measuring 300 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, with four mini-DisplayPort 2.1 outputs. The AMD card's display outputs are portable device dependent. The AMD card uses PCIe 4.0 x16 while the Intel card uses PCIe 5.0 x8.

Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Neither lists tensor cores. The AMD card's predecessor is Polaris Mobile, while the Intel card has no recorded predecessor. Release dates differ by over two and a half years, with AMD launching on January 3, 2023 and Intel on September 4, 2025. The Intel card has a launch MSRP of 1,199 USD.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher raw FP32 compute performance?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT delivers 20.23 TFLOPS FP32, while the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual delivers 12.29 TFLOPS. The AMD card is 64.6% higher in this metric despite having fewer shading units.

Q: How do the memory capacities compare?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 456.0 GB/s bandwidth. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel card provides three times the capacity and 58% more bandwidth.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT has a 120 W TDP with no power connectors. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has a 400 W TDP, requires a 1x 16-pin power connector, and recommends an 800 W power supply.

Q: Which card has more ray tracing cores?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT has 32 ray tracing cores, while the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has 20. The AMD card has 60% more ray tracing cores.

Q: Are there any benchmark scores for the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual?

A: The database records no benchmark scores for the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, while the AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT has ten recorded benchmark results with an average score of 12710.

Q: How do the process nodes compare?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT uses a 6 nm TSMC process with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual uses a 5 nm TSMC process with 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT | Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Xe2-HPG |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 5 nm |

| Transistors | 13,300 million | 19,600 million |

| Die Size | 204 mm² | 272 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 65.2M / mm² | 72.1M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 1280 MHz | 2000 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2469 MHz | 2400 MHz |

| Memory Clock | 2250 MHz | 2375 MHz |

| Memory Size | 8 GB | 24 GB |

| Memory Bus Width | 128 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 456.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 2048 | 2560 |

| TMUs | 128 | 160 |

| ROPs | 64 | 80 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 32 | 20 |

| Pixel Rate | 158.0 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 316.0 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 20.23 TFLOPS | 12.29 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 40.45 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| TDP | 120 W | 400 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | Not specified | 800 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x8 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1 |

| Dimensions | Not specified | 300 mm x 110 mm x 40 mm |

| Release Date | 2023-01-03 | 2025-09-04 |

The Verdict

The data presents a clear but incomplete picture. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT is a fully measured product with ten benchmark scores, an average score of 12710, and a 52nd percentile ranking. It competes within 1% of several established desktop GPUs from the prior generation, including the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 and GTX 590, showing that its performance class is well understood.

The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has no measured performance data, making any performance verdict impossible. What the specifications do indicate is a product aimed at a different segment. The 24 GB memory capacity, 456.0 GB/s bandwidth, 192-bit bus, and 400 W TDP suggest workstation or professional visualization workloads rather than the portable, power-constrained design of the AMD card. The AMD card's 120 W TDP and IGP form factor target mobile systems, while the Intel card's dual-slot 300 mm length and 16-pin power connector require a desktop chassis with substantial power delivery.

Architecturally, the AMD card wins on compute density and ray tracing core count, while the Intel card wins on memory capacity, bandwidth, pixel rate, and texture rate. The AMD card's 20.23 TFLOPS FP32 exceeds the Intel card's 12.29 TFLOPS by a wide margin, but the Intel card's 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate exceeds the AMD card's 158.0 GPixel/s. These are different tools for different purposes.

The database currently cannot answer which card performs better in real applications. The only honest conclusion from the recorded data is that the AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT has established benchmark results that place it in a competitive mid-range band, while the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual's specifications describe a higher-power, higher-memory professional card whose measured performance has yet to be recorded. Users choosing between them would be selecting between a measured mobile GPU and an unmeasured desktop workstation GPU, with the Intel card's 1,199 USD launch MSRP reflecting its professional positioning.