AMD Radeon RX 7600M vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains only one benchmark score for the AMD Radeon RX 7600M: a Geekbench OpenCL result of 63,775 points. This places the RX 7600M in the 89th percentile among all GPUs in the database. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no benchmark scores recorded, an average benchmark score of 0, and sits in the 50th percentile by default classification. Direct head-to-head measurements between the two cards are entirely absent from the database, so direct score comparisons cannot be made.

The RX 7600M's nearest rivals provide context for its measured performance. It trails the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP by 0.1% (that card averages 63,830 points) and the NVIDIA CMP 30HX by 0.1% (63,842 points). It edges ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 by 0.1% (63,693 points) and sits 0.7% behind the AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 (64,212 points). These deltas are small, indicating the RX 7600M operates within a tight performance band around the 63,700 to 64,200 score range. The LX PRO has no nearest rivals listed and no measured score, so its position cannot be quantified against any card in the database.

The absence of head-to-head benchmark data means the LX PRO's real-world performance is unverified. The RX 7600M delivers a concrete, measured result; the LX PRO delivers none. Any attempt to compare their compute capabilities directly fails due to missing data on one side. The database shows wins for neither card (0 wins each), reflecting the lack of paired tests.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher recorded benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600M has a Geekbench OpenCL score of 63,775. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no recorded benchmark scores, with an average benchmark score of 0.

Q: How does the RX 7600M compare to its closest rivals?

A: The RX 7600M is 0.1% slower than the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP and the NVIDIA CMP 30HX, 0.1% faster than the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56, and 0.7% slower than the AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100.

Q: What is the memory capacity difference between the two cards?

A: The RX 7600M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which card has higher compute throughput on paper?

A: The LX PRO lists 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1). The RX 7600M lists 17.27 TFLOPS FP32 and 34.55 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1). The LX PRO's theoretical figures are higher, but no measured benchmark confirms them.

Q: Do both cards support the same graphics APIs?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RX 7600M supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3.

Q: What are the power connector requirements?

A: The RX 7600M uses no power connectors (it is integrated into a portable device). The LX PRO uses a single 16-pin connector with a suggested 550 W power supply.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M uses the Navi 33 chip built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename "Hotpink Bonefish." It belongs to the Navi Mobile (RX 7000M) generation. The chip is manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC, containing 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter. The architecture includes 28 ray tracing cores, 1,792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip built on the "TrueGPU" architecture, belonging to the 7G100 generation. It is also manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC, but the transistor count, die size, and transistor density are listed as unknown. The LX PRO has no ray tracing cores listed. It provides 6,144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation units.

The RX 7600M's RDNA 3.0 architecture employs a chiplet-like design philosophy within a monolithic die, emphasizing per-clock efficiency and dual-issue compute units. The LX PRO's TrueGPU architecture is not described in the database beyond its core counts and process node. Both cards use GDDR6 memory, but the RX 7600M operates memory at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective), while the LX PRO runs memory at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The RX 7600M targets mobile integration with an IGP slot width and no power connectors, whereas the LX PRO is a dual-slot discrete card with a 16-pin power connector.

The RX 7600M supports Vulkan 1.4, a newer API revision than the LX PRO's Vulkan 1.3. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RX 7600M's predecessor is Polaris Mobile, while the LX PRO has no listed predecessor. The RX 7600M was released on January 3, 2023; the LX PRO has a release date of March 16, 2026.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every specification field in the database. The RX 7600M uses 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX PRO uses 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. Memory clock differs: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) for the RX 7600M versus 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) for the LX PRO.

Compute resources differ substantially. The RX 7600M has 1,792 shading units, 112 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 28 ray tracing cores. The LX PRO has 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, with no ray tracing cores listed. Pixel rate is 154.2 GPixel/s for the RX 7600M versus 192.0 GPixel/s for the LX PRO. Texture rate is 269.9 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s. FP32 throughput is 17.27 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS. FP16 throughput is 34.55 TFLOPS versus 49.15 TFLOPS, both at a 2:1 ratio.

Power and physical specifications diverge sharply. The RX 7600M has a TDP of 90 W, uses an IGP slot width, has no power connectors, and no suggested PSU. The LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W, uses a dual-slot form factor, requires a single 16-pin power connector, and a suggested 550 W PSU. The LX PRO measures 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. The RX 7600M has no listed dimensions.

Display outputs differ: the RX 7600M is marked "Portable Device Dependent," while the LX PRO provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The RX 7600M uses the Navi 33 chip with 13,300 million transistors and a 204 mm² die; the LX PRO's 7G105 chip has unknown transistor count and die size. Both use TSMC's 6 nm process and PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface. The RX 7600M's architecture is RDNA 3.0; the LX PRO's is TrueGPU.

The Verdict

The database presents a clear asymmetry. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M has a verified benchmark score of 63,775 in Geekbench OpenCL, placing it in the 89th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals confirm it performs within a few tenths of a percent of cards scoring between 63,693 and 64,212. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no benchmark scores, an average score of 0, a 50th percentile classification, and no nearest rivals. There is no measured evidence that the LX PRO performs at any level.

The RX 7600M is the only card in this comparison with demonstrated performance. It delivers a credible mid-to-high range OpenCL result, competitive with the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP and NVIDIA CMP 30HX within 0.1%. The LX PRO's theoretical specifications (higher TFLOPS, more memory, wider bus) suggest capability, but the database contains no confirmation of that capability. Benchmark results indicate that the RX 7600M is the empirically validated choice.

The LX PRO's 24 GB memory and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth are notable in the spec sheet, as is its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 figure. But without a recorded benchmark, these numbers remain unverified claims. The RX 7600M's 8 GB memory and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth are lower, yet its score is real and reproducible. The verdict from the data: the RX 7600M is the only card with proven performance; the LX PRO cannot be assessed beyond its listed specifications.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M wins in every category where measured data exists. It has a recorded Geekbench OpenCL score of 63,775, a 89th percentile standing among all GPUs, and competitive positioning against four named rivals. It wins on portability: a 90 W TDP, IGP slot width, no power connectors, and portable-device-dependent display outputs suit integrated mobile systems. It also wins on API currency, supporting Vulkan 1.4 over the LX PRO's Vulkan 1.3.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO wins in raw specification categories from the database. It offers 24 GB of GDDR6 memory versus 8 GB, a 192-bit bus versus 128-bit, and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth versus 256.0 GB/s. Its shading unit count (6,144) is more than triple the RX 7600M's 1,792. Its FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS exceeds the RX 7600M's 17.27 TFLOPS by a wide margin. Its pixel rate (192.0 GPixel/s) and texture rate (384.0 GTexel/s) both surpass the RX 7600M's 154.2 GPixel/s and 269.9 GTexel/s. The LX PRO also provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, whereas the RX 7600M's outputs depend on the host device.

However, these wins are all theoretical. The LX PRO's specifications indicate a design aimed at high-throughput compute or multi-display workloads, with a 225 W TDP and a 16-pin connector signaling a discrete, power-hungry card. The RX 7600M's wins are demonstrated: a measured benchmark score, a high percentile rank, and a compact, low-power mobile profile. The database does not show any benchmark where the LX PRO outperforms the RX 7600M, because no such benchmark was recorded. For verified performance, the RX 7600M stands alone; the LX PRO's advantages remain confined to its specification sheet.