AMD Radeon RX 7600M vs NVIDIA N1 16SM Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Radeon RX 7600M and the NVIDIA N1 16SM. The database contains a single OpenCL benchmark score for the AMD part, while the NVIDIA part has no recorded benchmark scores at all.

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M posts a Geekbench OpenCL score of 63775. This places it in the 89th percentile among all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP, scores 63830, a difference of only 0.1 percent. The NVIDIA CMP 30HX scores 63842, also 0.1 percent ahead. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 scores 63693, 0.1 percent behind, and the AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 scores 64212, 0.7 percent ahead. These margins are tight, indicating that the RX 7600M sits within a dense performance cluster.

The NVIDIA N1 16SM has an average benchmark score of zero, with no tests recorded and no nearest rivals listed. Its percentile versus all GPUs is 50, which is a default midpoint value rather than a measured result. The data cannot support any direct comparison of compute performance between these two parts, because the NVIDIA device lacks any measured scores.

The only meaningful numerical comparison available is between the RX 7600M's measured score and the N1 16SM's absence of scores. The AMD part delivers a verified 63775 OpenCL points, while the NVIDIA part has no verified points. Any statement about which device is faster in compute workloads must be qualified by this asymmetry. The AMD device has data; the NVIDIA device does not.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Radeon RX 7600M have a higher benchmark score than the NVIDIA N1 16SM?

A: Yes, in the recorded data. The RX 7600M has a Geekbench OpenCL score of 63775. The N1 16SM has no recorded benchmark scores, with an average benchmark score of zero.

Q: What is the memory configuration of each device?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600M uses 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The NVIDIA N1 16SM uses 128 GB of LPDDR5X memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 273.2 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Which device has more shading units?

A: The NVIDIA N1 16SM has 2048 shading units, while the AMD Radeon RX 7600M has 1792. The NVIDIA part also has more texture mapping units (128 versus 112) and more tensor cores (64 versus none listed for AMD).

Q: What process nodes do the two GPUs use?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600M is built on a 6 nm process at TSMC with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die. The NVIDIA N1 16SM is built on a 5 nm process at TSMC with an unknown transistor count on a 382 mm² die.

Q: Which device has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600M has a boost clock of 2410 MHz and a base clock of 1500 MHz. The NVIDIA N1 16SM has a boost clock of 2346 MHz and a base clock of 741 MHz.

Q: Are both devices integrated graphics solutions?

A: Yes, both are listed with a slot width of "IGP" and no power connectors. The AMD part's display outputs are described as portable device dependent, while the NVIDIA part lists 1x HDMI.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M belongs to the Radeon RX 7000 series and uses the Navi 33 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture under the codename Hotpink Bonefish. Its generation is listed as Navi Mobile (RX 7000M). The NVIDIA N1 16SM uses the GB20B chip with Blackwell 2.0 architecture and belongs to the Blackwell IGP (N1x) generation.

The manufacturing processes differ. AMD uses a 6 nm node at TSMC with a transistor count of 13,300 million and a die size of 204 mm². NVIDIA uses a 5 nm node, also at TSMC, with an unknown transistor count and a larger die size of 382 mm². The transistor density for the AMD part is 65.2 million transistors per square millimeter; no density figure is recorded for the NVIDIA part.

Compute resources differ substantially. The AMD part has 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, 64 ROPs, and 28 ray tracing cores. The NVIDIA part has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, only 24 ROPs, 16 ray tracing cores, and 64 tensor cores. The AMD device lists no tensor cores, while the NVIDIA device includes them as a dedicated resource.

The FP32 performance figures reflect different approaches. AMD delivers 17.27 TFLOPS of FP32 and 34.55 TFLOPS of FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, meaning the FP16 throughput is double the FP32 rate. NVIDIA delivers 9.609 TFLOPS of FP32 and 9.609 TFLOPS of FP16 at a 1:1 ratio, meaning both precision formats run at the same rate. The pixel rate also differs: AMD reaches 154.2 GPixel/s versus NVIDIA's 56.30 GPixel/s. The texture rate is closer, with AMD at 269.9 GTexel/s and NVIDIA at 300.3 GTexel/s.

Memory architecture separates the two as well. AMD uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth, a memory clock of 2000 MHz or 16 Gbps effective. NVIDIA uses 128 GB of LPDDR5X on a 256-bit bus with 273.2 GB/s bandwidth, a memory clock of 1067 MHz or 8.5 Gbps effective. The NVIDIA part has a much larger memory pool and wider bus, but the bandwidth advantage is modest at 273.2 GB/s versus 256.0 GB/s.

API support marks another major divergence. The AMD part supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The NVIDIA part lists DirectX as N/A, OpenGL as N/A, and Vulkan as N/A. This indicates the N1 16SM does not expose these conventional graphics APIs in the recorded data, which is consistent with its classification as an IGP with different driver and software expectations.

Specification Differences

The two devices differ in nearly every recorded specification field. The power consumption values are not comparable because AMD lists a TDP of 90 W while NVIDIA lists TDP as unknown. Both use no power connectors and have a slot width of IGP.

Clock speeds differ. The AMD base clock is 1500 MHz and boost is 2410 MHz, with a game clock of 2070 MHz recorded. The NVIDIA base clock is 741 MHz and boost is 2346 MHz, with no game clock recorded. The memory clocks also differ: AMD runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective, while NVIDIA runs at 1067 MHz with 8.5 Gbps effective.

The bus interface differs: AMD uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while NVIDIA uses PCIe 5.0 x16. Display outputs differ: AMD is listed as portable device dependent, while NVIDIA lists 1x HDMI.

The manufacturing data differs. AMD has a 6 nm process, 13,300 million transistors, a 204 mm² die, and a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². NVIDIA has a 5 nm process, unknown transistors, a 382 mm² die, and no density figure.

Release dates differ. The AMD part has a release date of 2023-01-03. The NVIDIA part has a release date of 2026-05-31. The AMD part lists its predecessor as Polaris Mobile; the NVIDIA part lists no predecessor. Both are marked as active in production.

Memory capacities and types differ completely. AMD uses 8 GB of GDDR6; NVIDIA uses 128 GB of LPDDR5X. The memory bus width is 128-bit for AMD and 256-bit for NVIDIA. The bandwidth is 256.0 GB/s for AMD and 273.2 GB/s for NVIDIA.

The AMD part has no launch MSRP recorded, and the NVIDIA part also has no launch MSRP recorded.

The Verdict

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M is the only one of the two devices with measured performance data. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 63775 places it in the 89th percentile of all GPUs in the database, and its nearest rivals are all within 0.7 percent of its score. That indicates a mature, well-characterized part with performance that sits in a competitive mid-range cluster.

The NVIDIA N1 16SM has no benchmark scores, no nearest rivals, and a default 50th percentile. Its FP32 rating of 9.609 TFLOPS is lower than the AMD part's 17.27 TFLOPS, and its pixel rate of 56.30 GPixel/s is far below AMD's 154.2 GPixel/s. However, the NVIDIA part carries 128 GB of LPDDR5X memory, which is an enormous capacity advantage for workloads that need large memory pools, and its 273.2 GB/s bandwidth edges out AMD's 256.0 GB/s.

The data points to different design goals. The AMD part is built for conventional graphics workloads with full DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 support, plus higher FP32 throughput and a much higher pixel rate. The NVIDIA part has no conventional graphics API support listed, a much lower FP32 rate, and a memory configuration that suggests a different use case entirely, one more centered on large memory capacity rather than raw compute throughput.

For buyers who need an established mobile GPU with verified compute performance and broad API compatibility, the AMD Radeon RX 7600M is the only choice supported by the data. For buyers who need 128 GB of memory in an integrated form factor with PCIe 5.0 connectivity, the NVIDIA N1 16SM offers a specification profile that the AMD part cannot match, but its performance remains unmeasured. No direct head-to-head wins are recorded for either device, so any purchasing decision must weigh the AMD part's verified scores against the NVIDIA part's unverified but distinctive specifications.