AMD Radeon RX 7600M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded benchmark data for these two GPUs comes from different test suites, so direct percentage comparisons across the same workload are not possible. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M delivers a Geekbench OpenCL score of 63,775, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER posts a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6,269.5. Each result was measured under a different rendering API and workload type, which means the scores cannot be translated into a single head-to-head delta.

The RX 7600M ranks in the 89th percentile among all GPUs in the database, which places it well above the midpoint of recorded results. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP, scores 63,830, a delta of just 0.1 percent in favor of the RX 9060 XT LP. The NVIDIA CMP 30HX scores 63,842, also 0.1 percent ahead. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 scores 63,693, which is 0.1 percent behind the RX 7600M. The AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 scores 64,212, putting it 0.7 percent ahead. These narrow deltas indicate that the RX 7600M sits in a tightly clustered performance band where a 0.7 percent swing separates the slowest and fastest adjacent entries.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, by contrast, ranks in the 36th percentile among all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, scores an identical 6,270, a delta of 0 percent. The NVIDIA Quadro K620 scores 6,282, which is 0.2 percent ahead of the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. The AMD FirePro W600 scores 6,223, a 0.8 percent deficit. The AMD Radeon R7 M350 scores 6,327, which is 0.9 percent ahead. The clustering here is even tighter, with all four rivals within 0.9 percent of the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER score.

Because the two GPUs were evaluated with different benchmarks, the database does not contain a shared workload where both scores appear. The RX 7600M result comes from an OpenCL compute test, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER result comes from a DirectX 12 steel nomad test. The percentile positions, however, tell a clear story about database-wide standing. The RX 7600M sits at the 89th percentile, far above the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's 36th percentile, even though the raw scores come from incompatible metrics.

The average benchmark score for the RX 7600M is 63,775, identical to its single recorded Geekbench OpenCL result. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has an average benchmark score of 6,270, rounded from its 6,269.5 Steel Nomad result. Neither GPU has multiple benchmark entries in the database, so the average scores simply reflect the single recorded measurement for each.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the RX 7600M and RTX 5070 Ti SUPER occupy very different positions in the database hierarchy. The RX 7600M's 89th percentile ranking places it among higher-performing entries in the overall GPU distribution, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's 36th percentile ranking places it below the median. This percentile gap is the most direct comparative statement the database supports, given the different benchmark suites used.

The RX 7600M is a mobile-class part with an integrated form factor, a 90 W TDP, and no power connectors. It uses 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is a dual-slot desktop card with a 350 W TDP and a single 16-pin connector. It carries 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a launch MSRP of 749 USD.

From a pure performance-tier perspective, the RX 7600M's 89th percentile is the stronger database standing. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's 36th percentile is substantially lower. However, the two GPUs target completely different physical and electrical envelopes. The RX 7600M is designed for portable devices where power draw and physical footprint are constrained, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is a full-size desktop accelerator with a much larger power budget and cooling requirement.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers more than double the FP32 throughput at 43.94 TFLOPS versus 17.27 TFLOPS for the RX 7600M. It also has substantially higher texture and pixel rates: 686.6 GTexel/s versus 269.9 GTexel/s, and 235.4 GPixel/s versus 154.2 GPixel/s. The memory bandwidth advantage is even more pronounced, with 896.0 GB/s versus 256.0 GB/s, a 3.5 times difference. These specifications indicate that the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is the more capable part in absolute compute and memory terms, despite its lower database percentile.

The percentile discrepancy likely reflects the different benchmark populations each GPU is compared against in the database, rather than a reversal of raw capability. The RX 7600M's score was recorded in OpenCL, a compute-oriented API, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER was measured in a DirectX 12 gaming workload. Users should interpret the percentile figures as relative standing within each benchmark's respective comparison pool.

Architecture Differences

The RX 7600M uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Navi Mobile generation under the RX 7000M series label from AMD. The process node is 6 nm at TSMC, with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses the GB203 chip built on Blackwell 2.0 architecture. It belongs to the GeForce 50 generation from NVIDIA. The process node is 5 nm at TSMC, with 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 120.6 million per square millimeter. The chip has no codename recorded in the database.

The RX 7600M has 1,792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, 64 ROPs, and 28 ray tracing cores. It has no tensor cores listed. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 8,960 shading units, 280 texture mapping units, 96 ROPs, 70 ray tracing cores, and 280 tensor cores. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has five times the shading units, 2.5 times the texture mapping units, 1.5 times the ROPs, and 2.5 times the ray tracing cores. The tensor core count on the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER provides dedicated AI acceleration hardware that the RX 7600M does not have at all.

The FP16 compute ratio differs between the two architectures. The RX 7600M delivers 34.55 TFLOPS of FP16 at a 2:1 ratio relative to its FP32 throughput, meaning the FP16 rate is double the FP32 rate. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers 43.94 TFLOPS of FP16 at a 1:1 ratio, meaning FP16 and FP32 run at the same rate. This indicates the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER does not gain a throughput advantage from FP16 workloads, while the RX 7600M does.

Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The bus interface differs: the RX 7600M uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses PCIe 5.0 x16. The display outputs also differ, with the RX 7600M listed as portable device dependent and the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER providing one HDMI 2.1b port and three DisplayPort 2.1b outputs.

Specification Differences

The process node differs, with the RX 7600M at 6 nm and the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER at 5 nm, both fabricated by TSMC. Transistor count differs substantially: 13,300 million versus 45,600 million. Die size is 204 mm² for the RX 7600M and 378 mm² for the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. Transistor density is 65.2 million per square millimeter versus 120.6 million per square millimeter.

Clock speeds differ across the board. The RX 7600M has a base clock of 1500 MHz, a boost clock of 2410 MHz, and a game clock of 2070 MHz. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2452 MHz, with no game clock recorded. Memory clock is 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective for the RX 7600M, versus 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective for the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER.

Memory configuration differs in capacity, type, bus width, and bandwidth. The RX 7600M uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Compute resources differ as detailed above: 1,792 versus 8,960 shading units, 112 versus 280 TMUs, 64 versus 96 ROPs, 28 versus 70 ray tracing cores, and null versus 280 tensor cores. Pixel rate is 154.2 GPixel/s versus 235.4 GPixel/s. Texture rate is 269.9 GTexel/s versus 686.6 GTexel/s. FP32 is 17.27 TFLOPS versus 43.94 TFLOPS. FP16 is 34.55 TFLOPS versus 43.94 TFLOPS.

Power and physical characteristics differ sharply. The RX 7600M has a 90 W TDP, an integrated form factor, no power connectors, and no recorded dimensions. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a 350 W TDP, a dual-slot form factor, one 16-pin power connector, and dimensions of 304 mm by 137 mm by 48 mm. The RX 7600M was released on January 3, 2023, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a release date of December 31, 2025. The RX 7600M has the Polaris Mobile as its predecessor, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has no predecessor or successor recorded.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher database percentile ranking?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600M ranks in the 89th percentile among all GPUs, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER ranks in the 36th percentile.

Q: How much memory does each GPU have?

A: The RX 7600M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: The RX 7600M provides 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER provides 896.0 GB/s, which is 3.5 times higher.

Q: Which GPU has dedicated tensor cores?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 280 tensor cores. The RX 7600M has no tensor cores listed in the database.

Q: What are the TDP figures for each GPU?

A: The RX 7600M has a 90 W TDP. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a 350 W TDP.

Q: What benchmark was recorded for each GPU?

A: The RX 7600M has a Geekbench OpenCL score of 63,775. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6,269.5.

Where Each One Wins

The RX 7600M wins in the database percentile comparison. Its 89th percentile standing is far above the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's 36th percentile. It also wins on power efficiency in absolute terms, with a 90 W TDP versus 350 W, and it requires no external power connectors. Its integrated form factor makes it suitable for portable devices where space is constrained. The RX 7600M also has a higher boost clock relative to its power envelope, and its FP16 throughput of 34.55 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio offers a compute advantage for workloads that use half-precision arithmetic.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER wins on raw compute specifications. Its FP32 throughput of 43.94 TFLOPS is more than double the RX 7600M's 17.27 TFLOPS. Its FP16 throughput of 43.94 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio exceeds the RX 7600M's FP16 rate as well. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 8,960 shading units versus 1,792, 280 TMUs versus 112, 96 ROPs versus 64, and 70 ray tracing cores versus 28. It is the only one of the two with tensor cores, providing 280 of them. Its memory subsystem is substantially larger and faster, with double the capacity, double the bus width, and 3.5 times the bandwidth. Its texture rate of 686.6 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 235.4 GPixel/s both exceed the RX 7600M's corresponding rates of 269.9 GTexel/s and 154.2 GPixel/s.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER also wins on connectivity and expansion. It uses PCIe 5.0 x16, while the RX 7600M uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER provides dedicated display outputs with one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1b ports, while the RX 7600M's outputs are dependent on the portable device it is installed in. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a dual-slot cooling design and a 16-pin power connector, indicating it is intended for a desktop chassis with adequate power delivery and airflow.

The RX 7600M wins on density relative to its power draw. It delivers 17.27 TFLOPS at 90 W, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers 43.94 TFLOPS at 350 W. The RX 7600M achieves a higher transistor density per watt in the sense that its 65.2 million transistors per square millimeter on a smaller 204 mm² die requires far less power than the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's 120.6 million per square millimeter on a 378 mm² die. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's transistor density advantage of 120.6 million per square millimeter reflects the denser 5 nm process, but it comes with a much higher power requirement.

For use cases centered on portable gaming or compute in a low-power integrated package, the RX 7600M is the relevant option. For desktop workloads requiring maximum shading throughput, ray tracing core count, tensor core acceleration, and memory bandwidth, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is the stronger part. The database does not contain a shared benchmark result, so direct performance ranking between the two must rely on the specification deltas and the percentile positions, which point in opposite directions. The RX 7600M holds the higher database percentile, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER holds the clear specification advantage across nearly every compute and memory metric.