AMD Radeon RX 7600M vs Intel Arc G3 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data presents an unusual comparison. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M has a measured average benchmark score of 63775 in Geekbench OpenCL, placing it in the 89th percentile of all GPUs in the database. The Intel Arc G3, by contrast, has no recorded benchmark scores, an average benchmark score of 0, and sits at the 50th percentile. Direct head-to-head benchmark results between the two are empty, meaning there are no shared workloads where both parts have produced comparable numbers. The absence of data for the Arc G3 does not indicate equivalence; it indicates that the database has not yet captured any performance measurements for this mobile graphics solution.

The RX 7600M's score of 63775 can be interpreted through its nearest rivals. It trails the AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 by 0.7 percent, a margin of roughly 437 points. The RX 7600M sits marginally behind both the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP and the NVIDIA CMP 30HX, each by 0.1 percent, representing a difference of about 55 to 67 points. Meanwhile, it leads the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 by 0.1 percent, or 82 points. These deltas are extremely tight, placing the RX 7600M in a cluster of desktop and workstation GPUs that perform within a single percentage point of one another. The Arc G3, with no score, cannot be positioned within this cluster. The data shows a clear gap in measurable performance evidence, with the RX 7600M delivering a concrete score and the Arc G3 offering none.

Architecture Differences

The two parts come from fundamentally different design lineages. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M belongs to the Radeon RX 7000 series, built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 33 chip under the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It is part of the Navi Mobile (RX 7000M) generation and uses a 6 nm process node from TSMC. The Intel Arc G3 uses the Xe3-LPG architecture with the Panther Lake chip and belongs to the Arc Graphics-M (Panther Lake) generation, built on Intel's own 3 nm process. The RX 7600M packs 13,300 million transistors onto a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2 million transistors per square millimeter. The Arc G3's transistor count and die size are listed as unknown, so no density comparison is possible.

The compute resources differ sharply. The RX 7600M has 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, 64 render output units, and 28 ray tracing cores. The Arc G3 has 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 ray tracing cores. In every one of these categories, the AMD part holds a numerical advantage. The clock behavior also differs. The RX 7600M runs at a base clock of 1500 MHz, a boost clock of 2410 MHz, and a game clock of 2070 MHz. The Arc G3 has a much lower base clock of 300 MHz but a boost clock of 2400 MHz, nearly matching the AMD part's boost. Memory configurations are entirely different in kind. The RX 7600M uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128 bit bus, with a memory clock of 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) and a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s. The Arc G3 uses system shared memory, with system dependent bandwidth, and no dedicated VRAM. The RX 7600M has a 90 W TDP and connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, while the Arc G3 draws only 25 W and uses an integrated graphics processor interface. Both are integrated into portable devices, both have no power connectors, and both rely on portable device dependent display outputs.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the recorded data, the AMD Radeon RX 7600M wins in every measurable compute category. Its pixel rate of 154.2 GPixel/s versus 48.00 GPixel/s gives it roughly a threefold advantage in fill rate. Its texture rate of 269.9 GTexel/s versus 96.00 GTexel/s represents a similar margin. The FP32 throughput of 17.27 TFLOPS dwarfs the Arc G3's 6.144 TFLOPS, and the FP16 figures of 34.55 TFLOPS versus 12.29 TFLOPS follow the same pattern. The RX 7600M also has the only recorded benchmark score in the database, so it wins the only available performance test by default. The Arc G3's advantages are limited to efficiency and integration. Its 25 W TDP is less than a third of the RX 7600M's 90 W, and its system shared memory model eliminates the need for dedicated VRAM. The Arc G3 also uses a more advanced 3 nm process node from Intel, which suggests a newer manufacturing technology, though no transistor data exists to quantify the impact.

The RX 7600M's 89th percentile ranking indicates it outperforms the vast majority of all GPUs in the database. The Arc G3's 50th percentile is a neutral midpoint, but with no score attached, it is not evidence of any specific performance level. In workloads that depend on raw shading, texturing, rasterization, or ray tracing, the RX 7600M's larger counts and higher rates point to a decisive advantage. In power constrained mobile scenarios where a 90 W TDP is not feasible, the Arc G3's lower power draw becomes relevant. The data does not include any power efficiency measurements, so no direct comparison of performance per watt is possible.

The Verdict

The data supports only one direction. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M is the stronger GPU by every recorded metric. It has a benchmark score of 63775, placing it in the 89th percentile, while the Intel Arc G3 has no recorded score and a 50th percentile placeholder. The RX 7600M delivers 17.27 TFLOPS of FP32 compute versus 6.144 TFLOPS for the Arc G3, a difference of roughly 2.8 times. It offers dedicated 8 GB GDDR6 memory with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the Arc G3 relies on system shared memory. It has more shading units, more TMUs, more ROPs, and more ray tracing cores. The RX 7600M's pixel rate of 154.2 GPixel/s is over three times the Arc G3's 48.00 GPixel/s, and its texture rate of 269.9 GTexel/s is nearly three times the Arc G3's 96.00 GTexel/s.

The Arc G3's case rests entirely on its 25 W TDP and 3 nm Intel process. For a system where power consumption is the dominant constraint, the Arc G3 is the only choice that fits a 25 W envelope. The RX 7600M requires 90 W. There are no efficiency metrics in the database to determine how much performance the Arc G3 delivers per watt, so its lower power draw cannot be translated into a relative performance figure. For any application that values raw GPU throughput, the RX 7600M is the clear selection. For an ultra-low power integrated solution, the Arc G3 has a role, but the data cannot confirm it matches the RX 7600M in any compute workload. The verdict from the database is unambiguous: the RX 7600M dominates the measurements, and the Arc G3 is an unmeasured, lower-power alternative.

FAQ

Q: What is the Geekbench OpenCL score of the AMD Radeon RX 7600M?

A: The RX 7600M scores 63775 in Geekbench OpenCL, placing it in the 89th percentile of all GPUs in the database.

Q: Does the Intel Arc G3 have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No, the Arc G3 has an empty benchmark list and an average benchmark score of 0, placing it at the 50th percentile.

Q: How does the RX 7600M compare to its nearest rivals?

A: It trails the AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 by 0.7 percent, the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP by 0.1 percent, and the NVIDIA CMP 30HX by 0.1 percent, while leading the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 by 0.1 percent.

Q: What are the memory configurations of the two GPUs?

A: The RX 7600M has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128 bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Arc G3 uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth.

Q: What are the TDP values for each GPU?

A: The RX 7600M has a TDP of 90 W, while the Arc G3 has a TDP of 25 W.

Q: Which GPU has more ray tracing cores?

A: The RX 7600M has 28 ray tracing cores, while the Arc G3 has 10.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 7600M | Intel Arc G3 |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Xe3-LPG |

| Chip | Navi 33 | Panther Lake |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Transistors | 13,300 million | unknown |

| Die Size | 204 mm² | unknown |

| Transistor Density | 65.2M / mm² | null |

| Base Clock | 1500 MHz | 300 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2410 MHz | 2400 MHz |

| Game Clock | 2070 MHz | null |

| Memory Size | 8 GB | System Shared |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | System Shared |

| Memory Bus Width | 128 bit | System Shared |

| Memory Bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | System Dependent |

| Shading Units | 1792 | 1280 |

| TMUs | 112 | 40 |

| ROPs | 64 | 20 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 28 | 10 |

| Pixel Rate | 154.2 GPixel/s | 48.00 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 269.9 GTexel/s | 96.00 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 17.27 TFLOPS | 6.144 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 34.55 TFLOPS (2:1) | 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 90 W | 25 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | IGP |

| Memory Clock | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | System Shared |

| Release Date | 2023-01-03T17:00:00.000Z | 2026-05-31T17:00:00.000Z |

| Generation | Navi Mobile (RX 7000M) | Arc Graphics-M (Panther Lake) |

The two GPUs share some traits: both use the DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) API, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Both are integrated into portable devices with portable device dependent display outputs, no power connectors, and an IGP slot width. The RX 7600M's release date is 2023-01-03T17:00:00.000Z, while the Arc G3's is 2026-05-31T17:00:00.000Z. Neither has a launch MSRP recorded, and neither has a successor listed. The RX 7600M lists Polaris Mobile as its predecessor, while the Arc G3 has no predecessor recorded.