AMD Radeon RX 7600M vs Intel Arc B770 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains a single benchmark result for the AMD Radeon RX 7600M: a Geekbench OpenCL score of 63,775. This places the RX 7600M at the 89th percentile among all GPUs, indicating that it outperforms the vast majority of recorded graphics cards in compute workloads. The Intel Arc B770, by contrast, has no benchmark entries in the database, meaning its average benchmark score is recorded as zero and its percentile standing is 50th, which simply reflects the absence of measured data rather than a comparative performance level.

Because the head-to-head benchmark array between these two parts is empty, the only quantitative comparison available is through the RX 7600M's nearest rivals. The RX 7600M sits within a narrow band of scores: it trails the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP by 0.1%, trails the NVIDIA CMP 30HX by 0.1%, leads the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 by 0.1%, and trails the AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 by 0.7%. This clustering shows that the RX 7600M's compute performance is tightly grouped with several other mid-range and professional cards, with deltas under one percentage point in every case.

The Arc B770's lack of recorded benchmarks means no direct score comparison can be made. However, the specification data reveals that the Arc B770 carries substantially higher raw throughput figures: its FP32 compute is 19.66 TFLOPS versus 17.27 TFLOPS for the RX 7600M, a lead of roughly 14%. Its texture rate is 614.4 GTexel/s versus 269.9 GTexel/s, more than double, and its pixel rate is 307.2 GPixel/s versus 154.2 GPixel/s, also roughly double. These figures suggest that, should benchmark data be recorded, the Arc B770 would likely dominate in throughput-heavy workloads, but the absence of actual scores prevents a definitive statement from the data alone.

The Verdict

From the recorded data, the AMD Radeon RX 7600M is the only one of the two with any measurable benchmark results. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 63,775, combined with an 89th percentile ranking, confirms that it delivers competitive compute performance within its class, as evidenced by its near-ties with the RX 9060 XT LP, CMP 30HX, and Pro Vega 56.

The Intel Arc B770, lacking any benchmark entries, cannot be positioned relative to the RX 7600M on measured performance. The database simply shows no scores for it. What the data does show is a substantial difference in rated specifications: the Arc B770 offers 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the RX 7600M provides 8 GB on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Arc B770 also has more than twice the shading units (4,096 versus 1,792), more than twice the texture mapping units (256 versus 112), and double the render output units (128 versus 64). Its boost clock is nearly identical at 2400 MHz versus 2410 MHz, but its base clock is significantly higher at 2100 MHz versus 1500 MHz.

For users relying on measured results, the RX 7600M is the only part with verified compute performance. For those who prioritize specifications alone, the Arc B770 shows a clear advantage in memory capacity, bandwidth, and raw throughput rates, but that advantage is not corroborated by any benchmark score in the database.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural families. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M is built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, using the Navi 33 chip with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Navi Mobile generation within the RX 7000M series. The Intel Arc B770 uses Xe2-HPG architecture, built on the BMG-G31 chip, and belongs to the Battlemage generation within the Arc 7 series.

Manufacturing processes differ as well. The RX 7600M is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, while the Arc B770 uses a 5 nm process, also at TSMC. Both parts are produced by the same foundry, but the smaller node gives the Intel part a potential density advantage, although the transistor count for the Arc B770 is listed as unknown, so no direct density comparison is possible. The RX 7600M contains 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter. The Arc B770's die is larger at 368 mm², but without a transistor count, its density cannot be calculated.

The RX 7600M has 28 ray tracing cores, while the Arc B770 has 32. Neither part lists tensor cores, so both rely on dedicated ray tracing hardware without AI acceleration units. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, meaning API feature parity is complete between the two. The RX 7600M is produced for portable devices, as reflected in its IGP slot width and lack of power connectors, while the Arc B770 is a dual-slot card requiring a 6-pin and an 8-pin power connector.

The RX 7600M's predecessor is listed as Polaris Mobile, while the Arc B770's predecessor is Alchemist. The RX 7600M was released on January 3, 2023, whereas the Arc B770 has a release date of December 31, 2025, indicating a gap of roughly three years between their launch windows.

Specification Differences

Memory configuration differs substantially. The RX 7600M has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Arc B770 has 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s bandwidth, exactly double in both bus width and bandwidth.

Clock speeds are close at the boost level: 2410 MHz for the RX 7600M versus 2400 MHz for the Arc B770. The base clocks differ more: 1500 MHz for the AMD part and 2100 MHz for the Intel part. The RX 7600M also lists a game clock of 2070 MHz, while the Arc B770 has no game clock recorded. Memory clock is identical at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed for both.

Compute unit counts favor the Arc B770 across the board. The RX 7600M has 1,792 shading units, 112 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. The Arc B770 has 4,096 shading units, 256 TMUs, and 128 ROPs. The FP32 throughput is 17.27 TFLOPS for the AMD part and 19.66 TFLOPS for the Intel part. FP16 performance, at a 2:1 ratio, is 34.55 TFLOPS for the RX 7600M and 39.32 TFLOPS for the Arc B770.

Power requirements differ sharply. The RX 7600M has a TDP of 90 W and uses no power connectors, consistent with its IGP form factor for portable devices. The Arc B770 has a TDP of 225 W, requires one 6-pin and one 8-pin power connector, and lists a suggested power supply of 550 W. The Arc B770 also offers fixed display outputs: one HDMI 2.1a and three DisplayPort 2.1, while the RX 7600M's outputs are described as portable device dependent. Both use a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface. The RX 7600M's production status is active, while the Arc B770's production status is not recorded.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher Geekbench OpenCL score based on the database?

A: Only the AMD Radeon RX 7600M has a recorded Geekbench OpenCL score, at 63,775. The Intel Arc B770 has no benchmark entries, so no score comparison is possible from the data.

Q: How does the RX 7600M's benchmark score compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RX 7600M trails the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP by 0.1%, trails the NVIDIA CMP 30HX by 0.1%, leads the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 by 0.1%, and trails the AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 by 0.7%. All deltas are under one percentage point.

Q: What are the memory differences between the two GPUs?

A: The RX 7600M has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Arc B770 has 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU has higher raw compute throughput?

A: The Arc B770 has higher rated throughput: 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 and 39.32 TFLOPS FP16, versus 17.27 TFLOPS FP32 and 34.55 TFLOPS FP16 for the RX 7600M. Both FP16 figures are at a 2:1 ratio.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The RX 7600M has a TDP of 90 W and uses no power connectors. The Arc B770 has a TDP of 225 W and requires one 6-pin and one 8-pin power connector, with a suggested power supply of 550 W.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same API versions?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. They also both use a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M wins in every measured category because it is the only part with benchmark data. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 63,775 places it at the 89th percentile, meaning it outperforms most recorded GPUs in compute workloads. Its 90 W TDP and connectorless design make it suited for portable devices where power draw and physical footprint are constrained. It also has an active production status, while the Arc B770's status is unrecorded.

The Intel Arc B770 wins on paper specifications. It offers double the memory capacity (16 GB versus 8 GB), double the bus width (256-bit versus 128-bit), and double the bandwidth (512.0 GB/s versus 256.0 GB/s). Its shading unit count is more than double (4,096 versus 1,792), its TMU count is more than double (256 versus 112), and its ROP count is double (128 versus 64). Its pixel rate and texture rate are both roughly double those of the RX 7600M. Its base clock is substantially higher at 2100 MHz versus 1500 MHz, although its boost clock is slightly lower at 2400 MHz versus 2410 MHz. The Arc B770 also has more ray tracing cores (32 versus 28) and a larger die (368 mm² versus 204 mm²).

For compute-intensive workloads where measured performance is required, the RX 7600M is the only option with verified results. For workloads that demand high memory bandwidth, large frame buffers, or maximum texture and pixel throughput, the Arc B770's specifications indicate a strong theoretical advantage, though no benchmark data exists to confirm real-world performance. The RX 7600M's compact form factor and low power draw make it the clear choice for integrated or portable systems, while the Arc B770's dual-slot design and dedicated power connectors point toward a desktop-oriented installation with a 550 W power supply.