AMD Radeon RX 7600M vs AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only shared benchmark in the database is Geekbench OpenCL, and the result is decisive. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE scores 83,109, while the AMD Radeon RX 7600M scores 63,775. That puts the RX 7650 GRE ahead by 23.3%, a substantial margin for a single compute workload. The RX 7600M trails by that same 23.3% when measured from the RX 7650 GRE's perspective.

Looking at the nearest rivals in the database clarifies where each card sits. The RX 7600M's average score of 63,775 places it nearly even with the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP (63,830, delta of -0.1%) and the NVIDIA CMP 30HX (63,842, delta of -0.1%). It is also within 0.1% of the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 (63,693) and 0.7% behind the AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 (64,212). The RX 7600M's performance cluster is tight, with all four rivals within roughly a percent.

The RX 7650 GRE's average benchmark score is 42,723, which is lower than its Geekbench OpenCL score because the database also includes its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result of 2,336. That mixed average pulls the overall number down. Its nearest rivals are all NVIDIA parts: the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER (43,223, delta of -1.2%), the Quadro M6000 24 GB (43,262, delta of -1.2%), the GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile (43,268, delta of -1.3%), and the Quadro M6000 (43,301, delta of -1.3%). The RX 7650 GRE sits within 1.3% of all four, indicating it clusters tightly with these high-end desktop and mobile offerings.

The head-to-head data shows a single win for the RX 7650 GRE and zero for the RX 7600M. That does not mean the RX 7600M is irrelevant, but it does mean the database records no benchmark where the mobile chip takes the lead. The 23.3% gap in Geekbench OpenCL is the only direct comparison available, and it favors the RX 7650 GRE by a wide margin.

Architecture Differences

Both GPUs share the same fundamental silicon. They use the Navi 33 chip, the RDNA 3.0 architecture, and the Hotpink Bonefish codename. Both are built by TSMC on a 6 nm process. Transistor counts are identical at 13,300 million, and the die size is 204 mm² for both. The transistor density works out to 65.2 million transistors per square millimeter on each part. The API support is also identical: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The differences emerge in configuration and clock speeds. The RX 7600M has 1,792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, 64 raster operation pipelines, and 28 ray tracing cores. The RX 7650 GRE raises shading units to 2,048, TMUs to 128, keeps ROPs at 64, and increases ray tracing cores to 32. That is a 14.3% increase in shading units, a 14.3% increase in TMUs, and a 14.3% increase in ray tracing cores. The ROP count stays fixed, which limits pixel throughput scaling but does not cap texture or compute gains.

Clock speeds differ substantially. The RX 7600M runs a base clock of 1500 MHz, a game clock of 2070 MHz, and a boost clock of 2410 MHz. The RX 7650 GRE starts at 1720 MHz base, 2350 MHz game, and 2695 MHz boost. The RX 7650 GRE's boost clock is 285 MHz higher than the RX 7600M's, and its game clock is 280 MHz higher. Those higher clocks, combined with the additional shading units, drive the compute throughput gap.

Memory configuration is similar in capacity and bus width but not in speed. Both cards use 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit interface. The RX 7600M runs memory at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed, yielding 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RX 7650 GRE runs memory at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, yielding 288.0 GB/s. That is a 12.5% bandwidth advantage for the RX 7650 GRE, which helps feed its extra compute units.

The resulting throughput numbers reflect the configuration differences. The RX 7600M delivers 154.2 GPixel/s pixel rate, 269.9 GTexel/s texture rate, and 17.27 TFLOPS FP32. The RX 7650 GRE delivers 172.5 GPixel/s, 345.0 GTexel/s, and 22.08 TFLOPS FP32. The texture rate jumps by 27.8%, and FP32 jumps by 27.8%. Pixel rate rises by 11.9%. FP16 performance differs in ratio: the RX 7600M achieves 34.55 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio, while the RX 7650 GRE achieves 22.08 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio. The RX 7600M actually has higher FP16 throughput, but the RX 7650 GRE's FP32 and FP16 are identical, which changes the workload profile.

Power and physical design diverge sharply. The RX 7600M is rated at 90 W TDP, uses an integrated form factor (IGP), has no power connectors, and is portable-device dependent for display outputs. The RX 7650 GRE is rated at 170 W TDP, uses a dual-slot design, requires a single 8-pin power connector, and suggests a 450 W power supply. The RX 7650 GRE measures 204 mm long and 115 mm high, while the RX 7600M has no recorded dimensions. The RX 7650 GRE uses PCIe 4.0 x8, while the RX 7600M uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Both are active production parts, but the RX 7600M launched on January 3, 2023, while the RX 7650 GRE launched on February 6, 2025. The RX 7650 GRE succeeds the Navi II generation and is followed by Navi IV, while the RX 7600M succeeds Polaris Mobile with no recorded successor.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data records one clear win category: Geekbench OpenCL. The RX 7650 GRE takes that test by 23.3%. No recorded test favors the RX 7600M. However, the architecture data suggests workload-specific strengths beyond the single measured benchmark.

The RX 7600M's higher FP16 ratio (2:1) means it can deliver 34.55 TFLOPS of half-precision throughput, which is 56.5% higher than its own FP32 rate. The RX 7650 GRE's FP16 is locked at 1:1, so it offers no half-precision advantage. Applications that rely heavily on FP16 compute could see the RX 7600M punch above its FP32 rating, though the database does not include a direct FP16 benchmark. The RX 7650 GRE's FP32 of 22.08 TFLOPS is 27.8% higher than the RX 7600M's 17.27 TFLOPS, so for standard single-precision workloads, the RX 7650 GRE is clearly ahead.

The RX 7650 GRE also wins on memory bandwidth. Its 288.0 GB/s exceeds the RX 7600M's 256.0 GB/s by 12.5%. That matters for texture-heavy scenes and high-resolution rendering where bandwidth constrains throughput. The RX 7650 GRE's texture rate of 345.0 GTexel/s versus 269.9 GTexel/s gives it a 27.8% advantage in fill-rate-bound scenarios. Its pixel rate of 172.5 GPixel/s versus 154.2 GPixel/s gives it an 11.9% edge in rasterization-heavy tasks.

The RX 7600M wins on power efficiency by a wide margin. Its 90 W TDP is 80 W lower than the RX 7650 GRE's 170 W TDP. Per watt, the RX 7600M delivers 0.192 TFLOPS per watt of FP32, while the RX 7650 GRE delivers 0.130 TFLOPS per watt. The RX 7600M's FP16 per watt is 0.384 TFLOPS per watt, versus 0.130 for the RX 7650 GRE. For thermally constrained or battery-powered systems, the RX 7600M's lower power draw is a decisive advantage, even though the database does not include a dedicated efficiency benchmark.

The RX 7650 GRE also has a form-factor advantage for desktop use. It is a dual-slot card with a single 8-pin connector and a 450 W suggested power supply, making it a straightforward drop-in for standard desktop builds. The RX 7600M's integrated form factor and lack of power connectors tie it to portable systems, where its 90 W budget fits thin-and-light designs. The RX 7650 GRE's display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, while the RX 7600M's outputs are portable-device dependent, meaning the host laptop determines connectivity.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split: the RX 7650 GRE is the higher-performance part, and the RX 7600M is the lower-power, mobile-oriented part. In the only direct benchmark, the RX 7650 GRE wins by 23.3% in Geekbench OpenCL. Its higher shading unit count, higher clocks, and higher memory bandwidth all point to stronger raw compute and rendering performance. The RX 7650 GRE also sits within 1.3% of the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, the Quadro M6000 24 GB, the GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile, and the Quadro M6000 in average score, meaning it competes with high-end desktop GPUs.

The RX 7600M clusters with mid-range workstation and crypto cards, all within 0.7% of each other. Its 89th percentile versus all GPUs is higher than the RX 7650 GRE's 83rd percentile, which reflects the fact that the RX 7600M's average score is based on a single strong OpenCL result, while the RX 7650 GRE's average is diluted by its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,336. That low Steel Nomad score drags the RX 7650 GRE's average down, but the OpenCL result is what matters for compute comparisons.

Users who need maximum compute throughput on a desktop should choose the RX 7650 GRE. It delivers 22.08 TFLOPS FP32, 288.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 32 ray tracing cores, with a launch MSRP of 279 USD. Users who need a GPU for a portable device with a 90 W power envelope should choose the RX 7600M. It offers 17.27 TFLOPS FP32, 256.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 28 ray tracing cores, but its integrated form factor and lack of power connectors make it unsuitable for desktop builds. The RX 7650 GRE's 170 W TDP and dual-slot design rule it out for thin laptops, while the RX 7600M's 90 W TDP fits them.

The predecessor and successor lines reinforce the positioning. The RX 7600M succeeds Polaris Mobile, a previous mobile generation, and has no successor, indicating it is a standalone mobile part. The RX 7650 GRE succeeds Navi II and is followed by Navi IV, placing it in a desktop product line with clear generational progression. Both are active production parts, so neither is obsolete. The choice comes down to platform: desktop users take the RX 7650 GRE, portable users take the RX 7600M.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher Geekbench OpenCL score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE scores 83,109, while the AMD Radeon RX 7600M scores 63,775. The RX 7650 GRE leads by 23.3%.

Q: Do both GPUs use the same chip and architecture?

A: Yes, both use the Navi 33 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture and the Hotpink Bonefish codename. Both are built by TSMC on a 6 nm process with 13,300 million transistors and a 204 mm² die size.

Q: What is the memory configuration difference?

A: Both have 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus. The RX 7600M runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RX 7650 GRE runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: How do the power requirements compare?

A: The RX 7600M has a 90 W TDP, uses an integrated form factor, and has no power connectors. The RX 7650 GRE has a 170 W TDP, uses a dual-slot design, requires a single 8-pin connector, and suggests a 450 W power supply.

Q: What are the FP32 compute throughput figures?

A: The RX 7600M delivers 17.27 TFLOPS FP32, while the RX 7650 GRE delivers 22.08 TFLOPS FP32, a 27.8% advantage for the RX 7650 GRE.

Q: Which GPU has more ray tracing cores?

A: The RX 7650 GRE has 32 ray tracing cores, while the RX 7600M has 28. The RX 7650 GRE also has more shading units (2,048 versus 1,792) and more TMUs (128 versus 112).