AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT vs Intel Arc Pro B70 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data does not contain any direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT and the Intel Arc Pro B70. The head-to-head benchmark list is empty, and the win counts for both cards stand at zero. Consequently, any assessment of relative performance must rely on the individual benchmark scores available for the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT and the architectural specifications of the Intel Arc Pro B70.

For the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT, the database lists a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2348, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 92426, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 48366. PassMark results include a G3D score of 17132, a G2D score of 1030, and a GPU compute score of 8987. Legacy DirectX tests show scores of 228 for DirectX 9, 167 for DirectX 11, 85 for DirectX 10, and 65 for DirectX 12. The card's average benchmark score is 17083, placing it in the 60th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, has an average score of 17208, which is 0.7% higher, indicating the RX 7600 XT trails that card by less than one percentage point. The AMD card leads the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 by 0.3%, the AMD Radeon HD 7970M by 0.4%, and the NVIDIA Tesla M4 by 0.9%.

The Intel Arc Pro B70 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, and its nearest rivals list is empty. This makes a numeric comparison of application performance impossible. The only quantitative performance indicator for the B70 is its percentile rank of 50, which reflects its position among all GPUs in the database, though without any test scores to substantiate it.

Architecture Differences

The two cards come from different architectural generations and process nodes. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It is manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC and contains 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter. The Intel Arc Pro B70 uses the BMG-G31 chip based on Xe2-HPG architecture, part of the Battlemage Pro Series. It is built on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 368 mm². The transistor count for the B70 is listed as unknown.

The compute resources differ substantially. The RX 7600 XT has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 raster operation units, and 32 ray tracing cores. The Arc Pro B70 doubles most of these: 4096 shading units, 256 TMUs, 128 ROPs, and 32 ray tracing cores. The B70 matches the RX 7600 XT in ray tracing core count but doubles the shading, texture, and raster hardware.

Clock specifications also differ. The RX 7600 XT has a base clock of 1980 MHz, a boost clock of 2755 MHz, and a game clock of 2470 MHz. The Arc Pro B70 runs at a base clock of 2280 MHz and a boost clock of 2800 MHz, with no game clock listed. Memory clocks are 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) for the AMD card and 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective) for the Intel card.

Memory configurations are a major differentiator. The RX 7600 XT carries 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Arc Pro B70 carries 32 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, providing 608.0 GB/s of bandwidth. That is exactly double the memory capacity and more than double the bandwidth.

Rates and throughput figures reflect the hardware differences. The RX 7600 XT achieves a pixel rate of 176.3 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 352.6 GTexel/s. The Arc Pro B70 achieves 358.4 GPixel/s and 716.8 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is close: 22.57 TFLOPS for the AMD card versus 22.94 TFLOPS for the Intel card. FP16 performance diverges significantly: the RX 7600 XT delivers 22.57 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio, while the Arc Pro B70 delivers 45.88 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio.

The bus interfaces differ as well. The RX 7600 XT uses PCIe 4.0 x8, while the Arc Pro B70 uses PCIe 5.0 x16, a wider and newer interface. Both cards share the same display outputs: one HDMI 2.1a port and three DisplayPort 2.1 ports. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Neither card lists tensor cores.

Power specifications are recorded for both. The RX 7600 XT has a TDP of 190 W and a suggested PSU of 450 W. The Arc Pro B70 has a TDP of 230 W and a suggested PSU of 550 W. Both are dual-slot cards with a single 8-pin power connector. Physical dimensions differ: the RX 7600 XT measures 204 mm in length and 115 mm in height, while the Arc Pro B70 measures 267 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 39 mm in width.

Release timing differs by over two years. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT was released on 2024-01-23, while the Intel Arc Pro B70 is dated 2026-03-25. The RX 7600 XT has a listed predecessor in Navi II and a successor in Navi IV, while the Arc Pro B70 lists neither.

Where Each One Wins

Given the lack of direct head-to-head results, the wins must be inferred from the data that exists. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is the only card with actual benchmark scores, and those scores establish its position in the 60th percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 17083 puts it slightly below the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 by 0.7%, and above the GTX 690, HD 7970M, and Tesla M4 by margins of 0.3% to 0.9%. The card shows a wide spread across legacy tests, with a DirectX 9 score of 228 and a DirectX 11 score of 167, but lower DirectX 10 and DirectX 12 scores of 85 and 65 respectively. The PassMark G3D score of 17132 and GPU compute score of 8987 indicate solid general 3D and compute performance for a card in this class.

The Intel Arc Pro B70 has no benchmark scores, so it cannot be credited with any measured wins. However, its specifications suggest areas where it would likely dominate if tested. The 32 GB memory capacity and 608.0 GB/s bandwidth are double the AMD card's 16 GB and 288.0 GB/s. The shading unit count of 4096, TMU count of 256, and ROP count of 128 are all double the RX 7600 XT's respective counts. The pixel rate of 358.4 GPixel/s and texture rate of 716.8 GTexel/s are both roughly double the AMD card's figures. FP16 throughput of 45.88 TFLOPS versus 22.57 TFLOPS shows a clear advantage in workloads that use packed math.

The FP32 performance is nearly identical, with 22.94 TFLOPS for the Intel card and 22.57 TFLOPS for the AMD card. This suggests that in pure single-precision compute tasks, the two cards would be close, with the B70 holding a slight edge. The B70 also has a higher boost clock at 2800 MHz versus 2755 MHz, and a higher base clock at 2280 MHz versus 1980 MHz.

FAQ

Q: Which card has more memory?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B70 has 32 GB of GDDR6, while the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT has 16 GB of GDDR6.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: The Arc Pro B70 provides 608.0 GB/s over a 256-bit bus, while the RX 7600 XT provides 288.0 GB/s over a 128-bit bus.

Q: Do the cards have the same ray tracing core count?

A: Yes, both the RX 7600 XT and the Arc Pro B70 list 32 ray tracing cores.

Q: What is the FP32 performance of each card?

A: The RX 7600 XT delivers 22.57 TFLOPS, and the Arc Pro B70 delivers 22.94 TFLOPS, a difference of roughly 1.6%.

Q: Which card has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B70 has a boost clock of 2800 MHz, compared to 2755 MHz for the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT.

Q: Are there any recorded benchmark scores for the Intel Arc Pro B70?

A: No, the database lists no benchmark scores for the Arc Pro B70, and its average benchmark score is recorded as 0.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ in nearly every major specification category.

| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT | Intel Arc Pro B70 |

|---|---|---|

| Process node | 6 nm | 5 nm |

| Die size | 204 mm² | 368 mm² |

| Transistors | 13,300 million | unknown |

| Base clock | 1980 MHz | 2280 MHz |

| Boost clock | 2755 MHz | 2800 MHz |

| Memory clock | 2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective | 2375 MHz 19 Gbps effective |

| Memory size | 16 GB | 32 GB |

| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |

| Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 608.0 GB/s |

| Shading units | 2048 | 4096 |

| TMUs | 128 | 256 |

| ROPs | 64 | 128 |

| Pixel rate | 176.3 GPixel/s | 358.4 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 352.6 GTexel/s | 716.8 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 22.57 TFLOPS | 22.94 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 22.57 TFLOPS (1:1) | 45.88 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 190 W | 230 W |

| Suggested PSU | 450 W | 550 W |

| Bus interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |

| Length | 204 mm | 267 mm |

| Height | 115 mm | 110 mm |

| Width | not listed | 39 mm |

| Launch MSRP | 329 USD | 949 USD |

| Release date | 2024-01-23 | 2026-03-25 |

| Percentile | 60 | 50 |

| Average benchmark score | 17083 | 0 |

The RX 7600 XT has a game clock of 2470 MHz, which the Arc Pro B70 does not list. The Arc Pro B70 has a width of 39 mm, which the RX 7600 XT does not list. The RX 7600 XT is in the Radeon RX 7000 series with a Navi III generation label, while the Arc Pro B70 is in the Battlemage Pro Series. Both cards share the same API support, display outputs, slot width, power connector type, and ray tracing core count.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split based on workload and intended use. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is a measured performer with a full set of benchmark scores. Its average benchmark score of 17083 and 60th percentile ranking place it in a familiar performance tier, trading blows with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, which scores 0.7% higher. The card's 16 GB memory, 288.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 22.57 TFLOPS FP32 make it a balanced option for general 3D rendering and compute, with the recorded PassMark G3D score of 17132 confirming solid rasterization capability.

The Intel Arc Pro B70 is an unproven quantity in the database, with no benchmark scores to validate its specifications. Its launch MSRP of 949 USD is substantially higher than the RX 7600 XT's 329 USD. The specifications point to a card built for large memory workloads: 32 GB of GDDR6, 608.0 GB/s of bandwidth, and double the shading units, TMUs, and ROPs of the RX 7600 XT. The FP16 throughput of 45.88 TFLOPS exceeds the RX 7600 XT's 22.57 TFLOPS by a 2:1 ratio, indicating a design aimed at workloads that can use packed precision.

The FP32 figures are nearly tied at 22.94 TFLOPS versus 22.57 TFLOPS, meaning raw single-precision compute would likely be close between the two. The Arc Pro B70's higher base and boost clocks, larger die, newer 5 nm process, and PCIe 5.0 x16 interface give it structural advantages. The RX 7600 XT counters with a smaller 204 mm² die, lower 190 W TDP, shorter 204 mm length, and a 450 W suggested PSU, making it the more compact and less power-hungry option.

For buyers prioritizing measured performance, the RX 7600 XT has the only verifiable scores in the database. For workloads requiring large memory capacity and high bandwidth, the Arc Pro B70's specifications are the clear choice, provided the lack of benchmark data is acceptable. The 60th percentile ranking of the RX 7600 XT versus the 50th percentile of the Arc Pro B70 is the only percentile comparison available, and it favors the AMD card, though the B70's percentile is not supported by any recorded test scores.